Chromosoma

, Volume 95, Issue 5, pp 324–338 | Cite as

Synaptonemal complex spreading in Allium cepa and A. fistulosum

I. The initiation and sequence of pairing
  • S. M. Albini
  • G. H. Jones
Article
Received:
Revised:

Abstract

The general features and fine structure of homologous chromosome alignment and pairing have been investigated in two species of Allium (A. fistulosum and A. cepa), which have similar karyotypes but very different patterns of chiasma distribution. Although there is no support for the occurrence of a general pre-meiotic alignment of homologous chromosomes, both species show some alignment of homologues as an immediate prelude to synaptonemal complex (SC) formation. In both species pairing usually commences at sub-terminal sites and is succeeded by numerous separate intercalary initiations of pairing in interstitial and distal regions and then in proximal regions. The last parts to pair, in both species, are pericentromeric and telomeric regions. There is, therefore, no evident relationship between the sequence of pairing and chiasma distribution in these species. Regularly alternating convergences and divergences of aligned axial cores (ACs), termed multiple association sites, are frequently observed. It is proposed that these represent potential pairing initiation sites and from observations on their spatial distribution it is argued that they may be evenly distributed through most of the genome. Small spherical or ellipsoid nodules are found at association sites and between closely aligned ACs which persist in the SC segments present during zygotene, but most of them disappear abruptly at the end of zygotene. These are termed zygotene nodules (ZN) and it is proposed that they are involved in matching corresponding sites on homologous chromosomes as well as possibly having a recombinational role. Their composition, structure, mode of action and relationship to pachytene recombination nodules are at present unknown.

Keywords

Homologous Chromosome Synaptonemal Complex Proximal Region Potential Pairing Telomeric Region 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albini SM, Jones GH (1984) Synaptonemal-complex associated centromeres and recombination nodules in plant meiocytes prepared by an improved surface-spreading technique. Exp Cell Res 155:588–592Google Scholar
  2. Albini SM, Jones GH, Wallace BMN (1984) A method for preparing two-dimensional surface-spreads of synaptonemal complexes from plant meiocytes for light and electron microscopy. Exp Cell Res 152:280–285Google Scholar
  3. Callan HG, Perry PE (1977) Recombination in male and female meiocytes contrasted. Philos Trans R Soc London Ser B 277:227–233Google Scholar
  4. Carpenter ATC (1975) Electron microscopy of meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster females. II. The recombination nodule — a recombination-associated structure at pachytene? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72:3186–3189Google Scholar
  5. Carpenter ATC (1979a) Synaptonemal complex and recombination nodules in wild-type Drosophila melanogaster females. Genetics 92:511–541Google Scholar
  6. Carpenter ATC (1979b) Recombination nodules and synaptonemal complexes in recombination-defective females of Drosophila melanogaster. Chromosoma 75:259–292Google Scholar
  7. Carpenter ATC (1984) Recombination nodules and the mechanism of crossing-over in Drosophila. Symp Soc Exp Biol 38:233–243Google Scholar
  8. Chandley AC (1986) A model for effective pairing and recombination at meiosis based on early replicating sites (R-bands) along chromosomes. Hum Genet 72:50–57Google Scholar
  9. Darlington CD (1935) The internal mechanics of the chromosomes. II. Prophase pairing at meiosis in Fritillaria. Proc R Soc London Ser B 118:59–73Google Scholar
  10. Fletcher HL (1978) Localised chiasmata due to partial pairing: a 3D reconstruction of synaptonemal complexes in male Stethophyma grossum. Chromosoma 65:247–269Google Scholar
  11. Gillies CB (1975) An ultrastructural analysis of chromosome pairing in maize. CR Trav Lab Carlsberg 40:135–161Google Scholar
  12. Gillies CB (1984) The synaptonemal complex in higher plants. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci 2:81–116Google Scholar
  13. Gillies CB (1985) An electron microscopical study of synaptonemal complex formation at zygotene in rye. Chromosoma 92:165–175Google Scholar
  14. Hasenkampf CA (1984) Synaptonemal complex formation in pollen mother cells of Tradescantia. Chromosoma 90:275–284Google Scholar
  15. Holliday R (1977) Recombination and meiosis. Philos Trans R Soc London [Biol] Ser B 277:359–370Google Scholar
  16. Holm PB (1977) Three-dimensional reconstruction of chromosome pairing during the zygotene stage of meiosis in Lilium longiflorum (Thunb.) Carlsberg Res Commun 42:103–151Google Scholar
  17. Holm PB (1986) Chromosome pairing and chiasma formation in allohexaploid wheat, Triticum aestivum, analyzed by spreading of meiotic nuclei. Carlsberg Res Commun 51:239–294Google Scholar
  18. Hotta Y, Stern H (1971) Analysis of DNA synthesis during meiotic prophase in Lilium. J Mol Biol 55:337–355Google Scholar
  19. Jenkins G (1983) Chromosome pairing in Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring. Carlsberg Res Commun 48:255–283Google Scholar
  20. Jones GH (1984) The control of chiasma distribution. Symp Soc Exp Biol 38:293–320Google Scholar
  21. Jones GH, Croft JA (1986) Surface spreading of synaptonemal complexes in locusts. II. Zygotene pairing behaviour. Chromosoma 93:489–495Google Scholar
  22. Jones RN, Rees H (1968) Nuclear DNA variation in Allium. Heredity 23:591–605Google Scholar
  23. King RC (1970) The meiotic behaviour of the Drosophila oocyte. Int Rev Cytol 28:125–168Google Scholar
  24. Kurata N, Ito M (1978) Electron microscope autoradiography of 3H thymidine incorporation during the zygotene stage in microsporocytes of lily. Cell Struct Funct 3:349–356Google Scholar
  25. Levan A (1933) Cytological Studies in Allium IV Allium fistulosum. Sven Bot Tidskr 27:211–232Google Scholar
  26. Levan A (1935) Cytological studies in Allium. VI. The chromosome morphology of some diploid species of Allium. Hereditas 20:289–330Google Scholar
  27. Levan A (1936) Die Zytologie von Allium cepa x fistulosum. Hereditas 21:195–214Google Scholar
  28. Loidl J, Jones GH (1986) Synaptonemal complex spreading in Allium. I. Triploid A. sphaerocephalon. Chromosoma 93:420–428Google Scholar
  29. Maguire MP (1974) A new model for homologous chromosome pairing. Caryologia 27:349–357Google Scholar
  30. Maguire MP (1984) The mechanism of meiotic homologue pairing. J Theor Biol 106:605–615Google Scholar
  31. Moens PB (1968) The structure and function of the synaptonemal complex in Lilium longiflorum sporocytes. Chromosoma 23:418–451Google Scholar
  32. Moens PB (1969) The fine structure of meiotic chromosome polarization and pairing in Locusta migratoria spermatocytes. Chromosoma 28:1–25Google Scholar
  33. Moens PB (1985) Research needs in meiosis, mechanisms of synapsis and chiasma regulation. In: Dellarco VD, Voyteck PE (eds) Aneuploidy. Plenum, New York, pp 397–407Google Scholar
  34. Oakley HA, Jones GH (1982) Meiosis in Mesostoma ehrenbergii ehrenbergii (Turbellaria, Rhabdocoela). I. Chromosome pairing, synaptonemal complexes and chiasma localisation in spermatogenesis. Chromosoma 85:311–322Google Scholar
  35. Rasmussen SW, Holm PB (1978) Human meiosis. II. Chromosome pairing and recombination nodules in human spermatocytes. Carlsberg Res Commun 43:275–327Google Scholar
  36. Rasmussen SW, Holm PB (1980) Mechanics of meiosis. Hereditas 93:187–216Google Scholar
  37. Rasmussen SW, Holm PB (1982) The meiotic prophase in Bombyx mori. In: King RC, Akai H (eds) Insect ultrastructure vol. 1. Plenum, New York, pp 61–85Google Scholar
  38. Stack SM, Anderson LK (1986a) Two-dimensional spreads of synaptonemal complexes from solanaceous plants. II. Synapsis in Lycopersicon esculentum (tomato). Am J Bot 73:264–281Google Scholar
  39. Stack SM, Anderson LK (1986b) Two-dimensional spreads of synaptonemal complexes from solanaceous plants. III. Recombination nodules and crossing-over in Lycopersicon esculentum (tomato). Chromosoma 94:253–258Google Scholar
  40. Stack SM, Soulliere D (1984) Rhoeo spathacea. I. The relationship between synapsis and chiasma formation. Chromosoma 90:72–83Google Scholar
  41. Stern H, Hotta Y (1977) Biochemistry of meiosis. Philos Trans R Soc London Ser B 277:277–293Google Scholar
  42. Stern H, Hotta Y (1978) Regulatory mechanisms in meiotic crossing-over. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 29:415–436Google Scholar
  43. Stern H, Hotta Y (1984) Chromosome organization in the regulation of meiotic prophase. Symp Soc Exp Biol 38:161–175Google Scholar
  44. Sybenga J (1966) The zygomere as a hypothetical unit of chromosome pairing initiation. Genetica 37:186–198Google Scholar
  45. von Wettstein D, Rasmussen SW, Holm PB (1984) The synaptonemal complex in genetic segregation. Annu Rev Genet 18:331–413Google Scholar
  46. Vosa CG (1976) Heterochromatic patterns in Allium. I. The relationship between the species of the cepa group and its allies. Heredity 36:383–392Google Scholar
  47. Wallace BMN, Jones GH (1978) Incomplete chromosome pairing and its relation to chiasma localisation in Stethophyma grossum spermatocytes. Heredity 40:385–396Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. M. Albini
    • 1
  • G. H. Jones
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeneticsThe University of BirminghamBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations