Chromosoma

, Volume 88, Issue 4, pp 249–255

C-banding and non-homologous associations

II. The “parachute” Xyp sex bivalent and the behavior of heterochromatic segments in Epilachna paenulata
  • M. E. Drets
  • E. Corbella
  • F. Panzera
  • G. A. Folle
Article

Abstract

A chromosome complement formed by 16 autosomes and an Xyp sex chromosome system was found in Epilachna paenulata Germar (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). All autosomes were metacentric except pair 1 which was submetacentric. The X and the Y chromosomes were also submetacentric but the Y was minute. The whole chromosome set carried large paracentric heterochromatic C-segments representing about 15% of the haploid complement length. Heterochromatic segments associated progressively during early meiotic stages forming a large single chromocenter. After C-banding, chromocenters revealed an inner networklike filamentous structure. Starlike chromosome configurations resulted from the attachment of bivalents to the chromocenters. These associations were followed until early diakinesis. Thin remnant filaments were also observed connecting metaphase I chromosomes. Evidence is presented that, in this species, the Xyp bivalent resulted from an end-to-end association of the long arms of the sex chromosomes. The “parachute” Xyp bivalent appeared to be composed of three distinct segments: two intensely heterochromatic C-banded corpuscles formed the “canopy” and a V-shaped euchromatic filament connecting them represented the “parachutist” component. The triple constitution of the sex bivalent was interpreted as follows: each heterochromatic corpuscle corresponded to the paracentric C-segment of the X and Y chromosomes; the euchromatic filament represented mainly the long arm of the X chromosome terminally associated with the long arm of the Y chromosome. The complete sequence of the formation of the Xyp bivalent starting from nonassociated sex chromosomes in early meiotic stages, and progressing through pairing of heterochromatic segments, coiling of the euchromatic filament, and movement of the heterochromatic corpuscles to opposite poles is described. These findings suggest that in E. paenulata the Xyp sex bivalent formation is different than in other coleopteran species and that constitutive heterochromatic segments play an important role not only in chromosome associations but also in the Xyp formation.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agarwal U (1961) Studies on the chromosomes of five species of Coccinellidae (Coleoptera). Cytologia 26:285–293Google Scholar
  2. Arrighi FE, Hsu TC (1971) Localization of heterochromatin in human chromosomes. Cytogenetics 10:81–86Google Scholar
  3. Chauhan KPS, Abel WO (1968) Evidence for the association of homologous chromosomes during premeiotic stages in Impatiens and Salvia. Chromosoma 25:297–302Google Scholar
  4. Drets ME, Stoll M (1974) C-banding and non-homologous associations in Gryllus argentinus. Chromosoma 48:367–390Google Scholar
  5. Godin DE, Stack SM (1975) Heterochromatic connectives between the chromosomes of Secale cereale. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 17:269–273Google Scholar
  6. Goodpasture C, Bloom SE (1975) Visualization of nucleolar organizer regions in mammalian chromosomes using silver staining. Chromosoma 53:37–50Google Scholar
  7. Heitz E (1933) Die Herkunft der Chromocentren. Planta 18:571–636Google Scholar
  8. John B, Lewis KR (1960) Nucleolar controlled segregation of the sex chromosomes in Beetles. Heredity 15:431–439Google Scholar
  9. John B, Shaw DD (1967) Karyotype variation in dermestid beetles. Chromosoma 20:371–385Google Scholar
  10. Kacker RK (1970) Studies on chromosomes of Indian Coleoptera IV: In nine species of family Scarabaeidae. Nucleus 13:126–131Google Scholar
  11. Saha AK (1973) Chromosomal studies of the Indian coleopterans (Indian beetles). Cytologia 38:363–373Google Scholar
  12. Sanderson AR (1967) Cytological studies of stored product insects. I: Caryedon gonagra (F.) (Bruchidae). Proc. R Soc. Edinburg, B 70:107–114Google Scholar
  13. Smith SG (1950) The cytotaxonomy of Coleoptera. Can. Entomol. 82:58–68Google Scholar
  14. Smith SG (1951) Evolutionary changes in the sex chromosomes of Coleoptera. Genetica 25:522–524Google Scholar
  15. Smith SG, Virkki N (1978) In: John B, Bauer H, Kayano H, Levan A, White M (eds). Animal cytogenetics, vol 3, Insecta 5, Coleoptera. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Stuttgart, p 340Google Scholar
  16. Stack SM, Brown WV (1969) Somatic and premeiotic pairing of homologues in Plantago ovata. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 96:143–149Google Scholar
  17. Stevens NM (1906) Studies in spermatogenesis. Carneg. Inst. Wash. Pt. II, Sex Determination, 33–75Google Scholar
  18. Suomalainen E (1947) Parthenogenese und Polyploidie bei Rüsselkäfern (Curculionidae). Hereditas 33:425–456Google Scholar
  19. Vidal OR, Giacomozzi RO, Riva R (1977) Los cromosomas de Typophorus nigritus Fab. (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Eumolpinae). Polimorfismo Xy(Xyp)/Xyy(Xyyp). Physis 37:177–184Google Scholar
  20. Virkki N (1951) Zur Zytologie einiger Scarabaeiden (Coleoptera). Studien an der Spermatogenese. Ann. Zool. Soc. Fenn “Vanamo” 14:1–105Google Scholar
  21. Virkii N (1962) Chromosomes of certain meloid beetles from El Salvador. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn A, IV. 57:1–11Google Scholar
  22. Virkki N (1967) Chromosome relationship in some North American Scarabaeoid beetles, with special reference to Pleocoma and Trox. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 9:107–125Google Scholar
  23. White MJD (1973) Animal cytology and evolution. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, p 961Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. E. Drets
    • 1
  • E. Corbella
    • 1
  • F. Panzera
    • 1
  • G. A. Folle
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Human Cytogenetics and Quantitative MicroscopyInstituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente EstableMontevideoUruguay

Personalised recommendations