Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 417–424 | Cite as

Philopatric and nonphilopatric foundress associations in the social wasp Polistes fuscatus

  • Jeff E. Klahn
Article

Summary

  1. 1.

    Overwintering females of the paper wasp, Polistes fuscatus, were marked on their home colonies in 1977 and identified in the spring of 1978. Most females which joined foundress associations in 1978 did so with former nestmates, which are close relatives. The probability that any two associating females were nestmates ranges between 0.77 and 0.93.

     
  2. 2.

    Philopatric females — those which nested at the site where they emerged — enjoyed a higher probability that an associate would be a nestmate (0.90–1.00) than did nonphilopatric females (0.50–0.79).

     
  3. 3.

    Philopatric females formed associations of 2–7 wasps. Nonphilopatric females which did not found singly almost always formed associations of only two foundresses. The bias to two-foundress colonies in nonphilopatric females might be explained by a hypothesis of ‘selfish joining’.

     

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gamboa, G.J.: Intraspecific defense: Advantage of social cooperation among paper wasp foundresses. Science 199, 1463–1465 (1978)Google Scholar
  2. Gamboa, G.J., Heacock, B.D., Wiltjer, S.L.: Division of labor and subordinate longevity in foundress associations of the paper wasp Polistes metricus (Hymneoptera: Vespidae). J. Kans. Entomol. Soc.. 51, 343–352 (1978)Google Scholar
  3. Gibo, D.L.: The selective advantage of foundress associations in Polistes fuscatus (Hymneoptera: Vespidae): A field study of the effects of predation on productivity. Can. Entomol. 110, 519–540 (1977)Google Scholar
  4. Jeanne, R.L.: Social biology of the neotropical wasp Mischocyttarus drewseni. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harv. Univ. 144, 63–150 (1972)Google Scholar
  5. Litte, M.: Behavioral ecology of the wasp Mischocyttarus mexicanus. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2, 229–246 (1977)Google Scholar
  6. Metcalf, R.A., Whitt, G.S.: Intra-nest relatedness in the social wasp Polistes metricus. A genetic analysis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2, 339–351 (1977a)Google Scholar
  7. Metcalf, R.A., Whitt, G.S.: Relative inclusive fitness in the social wasp Polistes metricus. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2, 353–360 (1977b)Google Scholar
  8. Noonan, K.M.: Individual strategies of inclusive fitness maximizing in Polistes fuscatus foundresses. In: Natural selection and social behavior; Research and theory. Alexander, R.D., Tinkle, D.W. (eds.). New York: Chiron Press 1979Google Scholar
  9. Pardi, L.: Dominance order in Polistes wasps. Physiol. Zool. 21, 1–13 (1948)Google Scholar
  10. Turrilazzi, S., Pardi, L.: Body size and hierarchy in polygynic nests of Polistes gallicus (L.) (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Monit. Zool. Ital. NS 11, 101–112 (1977)Google Scholar
  11. West, M.J.: Foundress associations in Polistine wasps: Dominance hierarchies and the evolution of social behavior. Science 157, 1584–1585 (1967)Google Scholar
  12. West Eberhard, M.J.: The social biology of Polistine wasps. Misc. Publ. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich. 140, 1–101 (1969)Google Scholar
  13. West Eberhard, M.J.: The evolution of social behavior by kin selection. Q. Rev. Biol. 50, 1–34 (1975)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeff E. Klahn
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of IowaIowa CityUSA

Personalised recommendations