Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 323–330 | Cite as

Conspecifics as cues: A mechanism for habitat selection in the Panamanian grass anole (Anolis auratus)

  • A. Ross Kiester
Article

Summary

In an experimental choice situation, individuals of both sexes of the lizard Anolis auratus choose to associate with a conspecific individual regardless of its sex. Further, individuals of both sexes associate with an individual of A. tropidogaster, a related species. Given the choice between the two species, they choose their own. Given the choice between a conspecific and a small patch of natural habitat, they do not choose one or the other consistently. These experiments indicate that conspecific association does not function just as a mate selection mechanism as has been previously proposed. The initial association may, in addition, serve a habitat selection function. Conspecifics can thus be seen as cues indicating the presence of suitable habitat as well as being important biological factors in themselves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ballinger, R.E., Marion, K.R., Sexton, O.J.: Thermal ecology of the lizard, Anolis limifrons, with comparative notes on three additional Panamanian anoles. Ecology 51, 246–254 (1970)Google Scholar
  2. Hunsaker, D.: Ethological isolating mechanisms in the Sceloporus torquatus group of lizards. Evolution 16, 62–74 (1962)Google Scholar
  3. Jenssen, T.A.: Female response to filmed displays of Anolis nebulosus (Sauria, Iguanidae). Anim. Behav. 18, 640–647 (1970)Google Scholar
  4. Kästle, W.: Zur Ethologie des Grasanolis (Norops auratus) (Daudin). Z. Tierpsychol. 20, 16–33 (1963)Google Scholar
  5. Kiester, A.R.: Communication in amphibians and reptiles. In: How animals communicate. Sebeok, T.W. (ed.), pp. 519–544. Bloomington, IN: University of Indiana 1977Google Scholar
  6. Kiester, A.R., Gorman, G.C., Colon, D.: Habitat selection behavior of three species of Anolis lizards. Ecology 56, 220–225 (1975)Google Scholar
  7. Kiester, A.R., Slatkin, M.: A strategy of movement and resource utilization. Theor. Popul. Biol. 6, 1–20 (1974)Google Scholar
  8. Pyburn, W.F.: Species discrimination in two sympatric lizards, Sceloporus olivaceous and S. pointsetti. Tex. J. Sci. 7, 312–315 (1955)Google Scholar
  9. Rand, A.S., Williams, E.E.: The anoles of La Palma: Aspects of their ecological relationships. Breviora No. 327, 1–19 (1969)Google Scholar
  10. Sexton, O.J., Heatwole, H.: An experimental investigation of habitat selection and water loss in some anoline lizards. Ecology 49, 762–767 (1968)Google Scholar
  11. Siegel, S.: Nonparametric statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill 1956Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Ross Kiester
    • 1
  1. 1.Museum of Comparative Zoology and Society of FellowsHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations