Sex Roles

, Volume 19, Issue 1–2, pp 57–66

Gender differences in friendship patterns

  • Richard Aukett
  • Jane Ritchie
  • Kathryn Mill
Article

Abstract

The same-sex and opposite-sex friendship patterns of men and women students from two first-year psychology classes at the University of Waikato in New Zealand were examined. A friendship questionnaire previously used in the United States of America was administered to compare results of the two cultures. Findings from this study support American research suggesting that women are more intimate and emotional in their same-sex friendships than men, and tend to place a higher value on these friendships than men do. In accordance with findings of the American sample, New Zealand women emphasized talking, emotional sharing, and discussing personal problems with their same-sex friends, and men showed an emphasis on sharing activities and doing things with their men friends. Differences between the American and New Zealand samples were shown for men in the number of friends and the intimacy levels of these friendships. New Zealand men preferred numerous but less intimate same-sex friends, while women (as in the United States) showed a preference for a few, close, intimate same-sex friends. Men, in contrast to women, derived emotional support and therapeutic value more from their opposite-sex relationships than their same-sex friendships. Finally, more men than women stated they would not cancel an engagement with an opposite-sex friend in order to go out with a same-sex friend. Results are interpreted as suggesting a need for changes in the current socialization process of males who are taught to repress their emotions and form rather less intimate and possibly less beneficial same-sex friendships than women.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aries, E., & Johnson, F. Close friendship in adulthood: Conversational content between same-sex friends. Sex Roles, 1983, 9, 1183–1196.Google Scholar
  2. Balswick, J., & Peck, C. The inexpressive male: A tragedy of American society. Family Coordinator, 1971, 20, 363–368.Google Scholar
  3. Bardwick, J. The psychology of women: A study of bicultural conflicts. New York: Harper & Row, 1971.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, W. Consequences of different kinds of parental discipline. In M. Hoffman & L. W. Hoffman (Eds.), Review of child development research, 1. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1964.Google Scholar
  5. Bell, M. Fifteen-minute spot-checks of the involvement of children in activities in kindergartens, presented in chart form. In Education and the Equality of the Sexes report, Department of Education, Wellington, 1975.Google Scholar
  6. Bell, R. Friendships of women and of men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1981, 5(3), 402–417.Google Scholar
  7. Bernard, J. The female world. New York: The Free Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  8. Bronfenbrenner, U. The changing American child: A speculative analysis. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1961, 7, 73–83.Google Scholar
  9. Caldwell, M., & Peplau, L. Sex differences in same sex friendship. Sex Roles, 1982, 8, 721–732.Google Scholar
  10. Caplan, P., & Bujra, J. Women united, women divided. Comparative studies of ten contemporary cultures. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  11. Carkhuff, R. R. The art of helping, 5th ed. Amherst, MA: Human Resource Development Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  12. Cherry, L., & Lewis, M. Mothers and two-year olds: A study of sex-differentiated aspects of verbal interaction. Developmental Psychology, 1975, 12, 278–282.Google Scholar
  13. Cozby, P. Self-disclosure: A literature review. Psychological Bulletin, 1973, 79, 73–91.Google Scholar
  14. Davidson, S., & Packard, T. The therapeutic value of friendship between women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1981, 5, 495–510.Google Scholar
  15. Donnelly, F. Big boys don't cry. Auckland: Cassell, 1978.Google Scholar
  16. Douvan, E., & Adelson, J. The adolescent experience. New York: Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1966.Google Scholar
  17. Goldberg, H. The hazards of being male: Surviving the myth of masculine privilege. New York: Signet, 1976.Google Scholar
  18. Goldberg, S., & Lewis, M. Play behavior in the year-old infant. Early sex differences. Child Development, 1969, 40, 21–31.Google Scholar
  19. Komarovsky, M. Blue-collar marriage. New York: Vintage, 1967.Google Scholar
  20. Lefkowitz, M., Huesmann, L., & Eron, L. Parental punishment, a longitudinal analysis of effects. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1978, 35, 186–191.Google Scholar
  21. Lewis, R. A. Emotional intimacy among men. Journal of Social Issues, 1978, 34, 108–121.Google Scholar
  22. Lewis, M., & Freedle, R. Mother infant dyad: The cradle of meaning. In P. Pliner, L. Kramer, & T. Alloway (Eds.), Communication and affect: Language and thought. New York: Academic Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  23. Maxwell, G. Behaviour of lovers: measuring the closeness of relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1985, 2, 215–237.Google Scholar
  24. Mulhern, R., & Passman, R. Parental discipline as affected by the sex of the parent, the sex of the child, and the child's apparent responsiveness to discipline. Developmental Psychology, 1981, 17, 604–613.Google Scholar
  25. Pleck, J. The male sex role: Definitions, problems and sources of change. Journal of Social Issues, 1976, 32, 155–164.Google Scholar
  26. Powers, E., & Bultena, G. Sex differences in intimate friendships in old age. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1976, 38, 739–747.Google Scholar
  27. Resnik, J., & Amerikaner, M. Self-disclosure. In R. Woody (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of clinical assessment. New York: Jossey, 1979.Google Scholar
  28. Ritchie, J., & Ritchie, J. Child rearing practices in New Zealand. Wellington: A. H. & A. W. Reed, 1970.Google Scholar
  29. Ritchie, J., & Ritchie, J., Growing up in New Zealand. Sydney: George Allen & Unwin, 1978.Google Scholar
  30. Ritchie, J., & Ritchie, J. Spare the rod. New York: George Allen & Unwin, 1981.Google Scholar
  31. Rubin, L. B. Just friends. The role of friendship in our lives. New York: Harper & Row, 1985.Google Scholar
  32. Sears, P., Maccoby, E., & Levin, H. Patterns of child rearing. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson, 1957.Google Scholar
  33. Seiden, A., & Bart, P. Woman to woman: Is sisterhood powerful?, In Glazer-Malbin, N. (Ed.), Old family/new family. New York: Litton Educational Publishing Inc., 1975.Google Scholar
  34. Serbin, L., O'Leary, K., Kent, R., & Tolnick, I. A comparison of teacher response to the preacademic and problem behaviour of boys and girls. Child Development, 1973, 44, 776–804.Google Scholar
  35. Weitzman, L. Sex role socialization. CA: Mayfield Publishing Co., 1979.Google Scholar
  36. Williams, D. Gender, masculinity-femininity, and emotional intimacy in same-sex friendship. Sex Roles, 1985, 12, 587–600.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Aukett
    • 1
  • Jane Ritchie
    • 1
  • Kathryn Mill
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of WaikatoHamiltonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations