Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 247–256 | Cite as

Siblicide, parent-offspring conflict, and unequal parental investment by egrets and herons

  • Douglas W. Mock


O'Connor (1978) generated behavioral predictions from Trivers's (1974) theory of parent-offspring conflict (POC) in relation to avian brood reduction, especially for species using escalated sibling aggression. In general, when daily mortality rates fall between certain values (the “mortality difference thresholds” for parents and surviving offspring: O'Connor 1978), POC is expected. At such times parents and the early-hatching “senior” offspring are expected to disagree on the necessity, or at least timing, of the “victim” chick's death. Because that death is promoted directly by the senior chicks and because parents have realistic means of nullifying those efforts, behavioral conflict is expected. I examined the activities of all family members in one siblicidal (great egrets, Casmerodius albus) and one nonsiblicidal brood-reducing species (great blue herons, Ardea herodias) of ardeidae in Texas nesting colonies. Daily mortality rates over two breeding seasons approximated the predicted POC zone for four-chick (“B/4”) heron broods and three-chick (B/3) egret broods. As predicted, egret sibling aggression was significantly lower in two-chick broods. Herons seldom fought, regardless of brood size. Special attention was paid to the egret B/3 data for behavioral manifestations of POC. Parents did not interfere overtly with sibling fights (99.2% of 2,829), but parents seemed to have a subtle mollifying effect on the aggression (fewer “sever” fights occurred when parents were present). Parents showed no favoritism in food distribution to dying victim chicks. The mixed results are consistent with two rather different POC interpretations: (1) that significant conflict exists and the offspring are “winning” or (2) that there is no significant evolutionary conflict. In the latter case, parents are regarded as creating asymmetries among offspring (e.g., via hatch asynchrony), then leaving competition among siblings to run its course without further intervention (“laissezfaire” policy). This view explicitly recognizes that siblicide and other investment-skewing selfish chick behaviors may serve parental interests well-i.e., that equal allocation of resources is not likely to be the parental optimum. Using the relative reproductive values of each nestling as an index of the parent's unequal parental investment optimum produces a closer fit to the observed food distribution skew, but does not resolve the question of whether conflict remains.


Brood Size Difference Threshold Food Distribution Parental Interest Brood Reduction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alexander R (1974) The evolution of social behavior. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 5:325–383Google Scholar
  2. Altmann J, Altmann S, Hausfater G (1978) Primate infant's effects on mother's future reproduction. Science 201:1028–1030Google Scholar
  3. Bengsston H, Rydén O (1983) Parental feeding rate in relation to begging behavior in asynchronously hatched broods of the great tit Parus major. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 12:243–251Google Scholar
  4. Blaker D (1969) Behaviour of the cattle egret Ardeola ibis. Ostrich 40:75–129Google Scholar
  5. Braun B, Hunt G (1983) Brood reduction in black-legged kittiwakes. Auk 100:469–476Google Scholar
  6. Cash K, Evans R (1986) Brood reduction in the American white pelican (Pelecanus erythrorhynchos). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:413–418Google Scholar
  7. Charnov E, Krebs J (1974) On clutch-size and fitness. Ibis 116:217–219Google Scholar
  8. Clutton-Brock T, Guinness F, Albon S (1982) Red deer. Behavior and ecology of two sexes. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  9. Drummond H (1987a) Parent-offspring conflict and siblicidal brood reduction in boobies. Proc 1986 Int Ornithol Congress, Ottawa (in press)Google Scholar
  10. Drummond H (1987b) Parent-offspring conflict and brood reduction in the Pelecaniformes. Colonial Waterbirds (in press)Google Scholar
  11. Drummond H, Gonzalez E, Osorno J-L (1986) Parent-offspring cooperation in the blue-footed booby (Sula nebouxii): social roles in infanticidal brood reduction. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:365–372Google Scholar
  12. Eickwort K (1973) Cannibalism and kin selection in Labidomera clivicollis (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) Am Nat 107:452–453Google Scholar
  13. Fujioka M (1985a) Food delivery and sibling competition in experimentally even-aged broods of the cattle egret. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 17:67–74Google Scholar
  14. Fujioka M (1985b) Feeding behaviour, sibling competition and siblicide in asynchronous hatching broods of the cattle egret Bubulcus ibis. Anim Behav 33:1228–1242Google Scholar
  15. Gargett G (1978) Sibling aggression in the black eagle in the Matapos, Rhodesia. Ostrich 49:57–63Google Scholar
  16. Graves J, Whiten A, Heinzi P (1984) Why does the herring gull lay three eggs? Anim Behav 32:798–805Google Scholar
  17. Hahn D (1981) Asynchronous hatching in the laughing gull: cutting losses and reducing rivalry. Anim Behav 29:421–427Google Scholar
  18. Hausfater G, Hrdy S (eds) (1984) Infanticide: comparative and evolutionary perspectives. Aldine NYGoogle Scholar
  19. Henderson B (1975) Role of the chick's begging behavior in the regulation of parental feeding behavior of Larus glaucescens. Condor 77:488–492Google Scholar
  20. Horsfall J (1984) Brood reduction and brood division in coots. Anim Behav 32:216–225Google Scholar
  21. Kahl MP (1964) Food ecology of the wood stork (Mycteria americana) in Florida. Ecol Monogr 34:97–117Google Scholar
  22. Kluyver H, Van Balen J, Cave A (1977) The occurrence of timesaving mechanisms in the breeding biology of the great tit Parus major. In: Stonehouse B, Perrins C (eds) Evolutionary ecology. MacMillan, London, pp 153–169Google Scholar
  23. Lack D (1954) The natural regulation of animal numbers. Clarendon Press, Oxford UKGoogle Scholar
  24. Metcalf R (1980) Sex ratios, parent offspring conflict, and local competition for mates in the social wasps Polistes metricus and polistes variatus. Am Nat 116:642–654Google Scholar
  25. Milinski M (1978) Kin selection and reproductive value. Z Tierpsychol 47:328–329Google Scholar
  26. Mock D (1984a) Siblicidal aggression and resource monopolization in birds. Science 225:731–733Google Scholar
  27. Mock D (1984b) Infanticide, siblicide, and avian nestling mortality. In: Hausfater G, Blaffer Hrdy S (eds) Infanticide: comparative and evolutionary perspectives. Aldine, New York, pp 3–30Google Scholar
  28. Mock D (1985) Siblicidal brood reduction: the prey-size hypothesis. Am Nat 125:327–343Google Scholar
  29. Mock D, Parker G (1986) Advantages and disadvantages of egret and heron brood reduction. Evolution 40:459–470Google Scholar
  30. Mock D, Ploger B (1987) Parental manipulation of optimal hatch asynchrony in cattle egrets: an experimental study. Anim Behav 35:150–160Google Scholar
  31. Mock D, Lamey T, Ploger B (1987) Proximate and ultimate roles of food amount in regulating egret sibling aggression. Ecology (in press)Google Scholar
  32. Morris D (1986) Proximate and ultimate controls of life-history variation: the evolution of litter size in white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus). Evolution 40:189–181Google Scholar
  33. Nuechterlein G (1981) Asynchronous hatching and sibling competition in western grebes. Can J Zool 59:994–998Google Scholar
  34. Nur N (1984) The consequences of brood size for breeding blue tits II. Nestling weight, offspring survival and optimal brood size. J Anim Ecol 53:497–517Google Scholar
  35. O'Connor R (1978) Brood reduction in birds: selection for fratricide, infanticide and suicide? Anim Behav 26:79–96Google Scholar
  36. O'Gara B (1969) Unique aspects of reproduction in the female pronghorn (Antilocapra americana). Am J Anat 125:217–232Google Scholar
  37. Parker G (1985) Models of parent-offspring conflict V Effects of the behaviour of the two parents. Anim Behav 33:519–533Google Scholar
  38. Parker G, Macnair M (1979) Models of parent-offspring conflict IV Suppression: evolutionary retaliation by the parent. Anim Behav 27:1210–1235Google Scholar
  39. Parker G, Mock D (1987) Parent-offspring conflict over clutch size. Evol Ecol (in press)Google Scholar
  40. Parsons J (1976) Factors determining the number and size of eggs laid by the herring gull. Condor 78:481–492Google Scholar
  41. Ploger B, Mock D (1986) Role of sibling aggression in distribution of food to nestling cattle egrets (Bubulcus ibis). Auk 103:768–776Google Scholar
  42. Pugesek B (1981) Increased reproductive effort with age in the California gull (Larus californicus). Science 212:822–823Google Scholar
  43. Røskaft E (1985) The effect of enlarged brood size on the future reproductive potential of the rook. J Anim Ecol 54:255–260Google Scholar
  44. Russell E (1982) Parental investment and desertion of young in marsupials. Am Nat 119:744–748Google Scholar
  45. Rydén O, Bengsston H (1980) Differential begging and locomotory behaviour by early and late hatched nestlings affecting the distribution of food in asynchronously hatched broods of altricial birds. Z Tierpsychol 53:209–224Google Scholar
  46. Salfert I, Moodie G (1985) Filial egg-cannibalism in the brook stickleback Culaea inconstans (Kirtland). Behaviour 93:82–100Google Scholar
  47. Siegfried R (1972) Breeding success and reproductive output of the cattle egret. Ostrich 43:43–55Google Scholar
  48. Slagsvold T, Sandvik J, Rofstad G, Lorentsen O, Husby M (1984) On the adaptive value of intraclutch egg-size variation in birds. Auk 101:685–697Google Scholar
  49. Smith C, Fretwell S (1974) The optimal balance between size and number of offspring. Am Nat 108:499–506Google Scholar
  50. Smith J, Roff D (1980) Temporal spacing of broods, brood size and parental care in song sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Can J Zool 58:1007–1015Google Scholar
  51. Sokal R, Rohlf J (1981) Biometry. 2nd edn. Freeman, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  52. Stamps J, Metcalf R (1980) Parent-offspring conflict. In: Barlow G, Silverberg J (eds) Sociobiology: Beyond nature-nurture? Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp 598–618Google Scholar
  53. Stamps J, Clark A, Arrowood P, Kus B (1985) Parent-offspring conflict in budgerigars Behaviour 94:1–40Google Scholar
  54. Stearns S (1976) Life-history tactics: A review of the ideas. Qu Rev Biol 51:3–47Google Scholar
  55. stinson C (1979) On the selective advantage of fratricide in raptors. Evolution 33:1219–1225Google Scholar
  56. Tepedino V, Frohlich D (1984) Fratricide in Megachile rotundata, a non-social megachilid bee: impartial treatment of sibs and nonsibs. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 15:19–23Google Scholar
  57. thornhill R (1980) Rape in Panorpa scorpionflies and a general rape hypothesis. Anim Behav 28:52–59Google Scholar
  58. Trivers R (1974) Parent-offspring conflict. Am Zool 14:249–264Google Scholar
  59. Trivers R, Hare H (1976) Haplodiploidy and the evolution of social insects. Science 191:249–263Google Scholar
  60. vom Saal F (1981) Variation in phenotype due to random intrauterine positioning of male and female fetuses in rodents. J Reprod Fert 62:633–650Google Scholar
  61. Werschkul D (1979) Nestling mortality and the adaptive significance of early locomotion in the little blue heron. Auk 96:116–130Google Scholar
  62. Wittenberger J (1981) Animal social behavior. Duxbury Press, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  63. Young EC (1963) The breeding behaviour of the South Polar Skua. Ibis 105:203–233Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Douglas W. Mock
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA

Personalised recommendations