Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 275–301 | Cite as

The extended satisfaction with life scale: Development and psychometric properties

  • Vincent C. Alfonso
  • David B. Allison
  • Damon E. Rader
  • Bernard S. Gorman
Article

Abstract

The development and psychometric properties of the Extended Satisfaction With Life Scale (ESWLS) are described in detail. The ESWLS is a 50-item self-report scale that measures satisfaction with life in nine domains. It can be completed by most people in under 20 minutes and can be used by researchers and clinicians. The readability of the ESWLS was estimated to be between the seventh and tenth grade levels. Internal consistency, estimated by coefficient α, ranged from 0.81 to 0.96 for the individual subscales. Two-week test-retest reliability coefficients ranged from 0.74 to 0.87. Results of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses strongly supported the factor structure of the ESWLS. Preliminary evidence of convergent and discriminant validity is provided as well as preliminary norms.

Keywords

Internal Consistency Factor Structure Psychometric Property Confirmatory Factor Analysis Discriminant Validity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alfonso, V. C.: 1995, ‘Measures of quality of life, subjective well-being, and satisfaction with life’, in David B. Allison (ed.), Handbook of Assessment Methods for Eating Behaviors and Weight-related Problems: Measures, Theory, and Research (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), pp. 23–80.Google Scholar
  2. Alfonso, V. C., Allison, D. B., and Dunn, G. M.: 1992, ‘The relationship between sexual fantasy and satisfaction: A multidimensional analysis of gender differences’, Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality 5, pp. 19–37.Google Scholar
  3. Allison, D. B., Gorman, B. S., and Primavera, L. H.: 1993, ‘The most commonly asked questions by statistical consultees: Our favourite responses and recommended readings’, Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs 119, pp. 153–185.Google Scholar
  4. Allison, D. B., Alfonso, V. C., and Dunn, G. M.: 1991, ‘The extended satisfaction with life scale’, the Behavior Therapist 14, pp. 15–16.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, J. C. and Gerbing, D. W.: 1988, ‘Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach’, Psychological Bulletin 103, pp. 411–423.Google Scholar
  6. Andrews, F. M., and Robinson, J. P.: 1991, ‘Measures of subjective well-being’, in J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, and L. W. Wrightsman (eds.), Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes (Academic Press, New York), pp. 61–114.Google Scholar
  7. Andrews, F. M., and Withey, S. B.: 1976, Social Indicators of Well-being: Americans' Perceptions of Life Quality, (Plenum Press, New York).Google Scholar
  8. Barad, S. J., and Hughes, H. M.: 1984, ‘Readability of the personality inventory for children’, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 52, pp. 906–907.Google Scholar
  9. Beard, J. G., and Ragheb, M. G.: 1980, ‘Measuring leisure satisfaction’, Journal of Leisure Research 12, pp. 20–33.Google Scholar
  10. Berndt, D. J., Schwartz, S., and Kaiser, C. F.: 1983, ‘Readability of self-report depression inventories’, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 51, pp. 627–628.Google Scholar
  11. Bruce, B., and Rubin, A.: 1988, ‘Readability formulas: Matching tool and task’, in A. Davison and G. M. Green (eds.), Linguistic Complexity and Text Comprehension: Readability Issues Reconsidered (Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey), pp. 5–22.Google Scholar
  12. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., and Rogers, W. L.: 1976, The Quality of American Life (Russell Sage, New York).Google Scholar
  13. Couch, A., and Keniston, K.: 1960, ‘Yeasayers and naysayers: Agreeing response set as a personality variable’, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 60, pp. 151–174.Google Scholar
  14. Davidson, J. K. Sr., and Hoffman, L. E.: 1986, ‘Sexual fantasies and sexual satisfaction: An empirical analysis of erotic thought’, The Journal of Sex Research 22, pp. 184–205.Google Scholar
  15. Diener, E.: 1984, ‘Subjective well-being’, Psychological Bulletin 95, pp. 542–575.Google Scholar
  16. Diener, E.: 1994, ‘Assessing subjective well-being: Progress and opportunities’, Social Indicators Research 31, pp. 103–157.Google Scholar
  17. Diener, E., and Diener, C.: 1996, ‘Most people are happy’, Psychological Science 7, pp. 181–185.Google Scholar
  18. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., and Griffin, S.: 1985, ‘The satisfaction with life scale’, Journal of Personality Assessment 49, pp. 71–75.Google Scholar
  19. Diener, E., Sandvik, E., Pavot, W., and Gallagher, D.: 1991, ‘Response artifacts in the measurement of subjective well-being’, Social Indicators Research 24, pp. 35–56.Google Scholar
  20. Flesch, R.: 1977, ‘A new readability yardstick’, Journal of Applied Psychology 32, pp. 221–233.Google Scholar
  21. Franzoi, S. L., and Shields, S. A.: 1984, ‘The Body-Esteem Scale: Multidimensional structure and sex differences in a college population’, Journal of Personality Assessment 48, pp. 173–178.Google Scholar
  22. Frisch, M. B.: 1993, ‘The Quality of Life Inventory: A cognitive-behavioral tool for complete problem assessment, treatment planning, and outcome evaluation, the Behavior Therapist 16, pp. 42–44.Google Scholar
  23. Frisch, M. B., Cronell, J., Villanueva, M., and Retzlaff, P. J.: 1992, ‘Clinical validation of the Quality of Life Inventory: A measure of life satisfaction for use in treatment planning and outcome assessment’, Psychological Assessment 4, pp. 92–101.Google Scholar
  24. Fry, E.: 1977, ‘Fry's Readability Graph: Clarifications, validity, and extension to level 17’, Journal of Reading 21, pp. 242–252.Google Scholar
  25. George, L. K.: 1981, ‘Subjective well-being: Conceptual and methodological issues’, Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics 2, pp. 345–382.Google Scholar
  26. George, L. K., and Bearon, L. B.: 1980, ‘Quality of Life in Older Persons: Meaning and Measurement (Human Science Press, New York).Google Scholar
  27. Graham, J. W., Hofer, S. M., and Piccinin, A. M.: 1994, ‘Analysis with missing data in drug prevention research’, in L. M. Collins and L. A. Seitz (eds.), Advances in Data Analysis for Prevention Intervention Research. National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph 142 (National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville MD).Google Scholar
  28. Graham, J. W., Hofer, S. M., Donaldson, S. I., MacKinnon, D. P., and Schafer, J. L. (in press). ‘Analysis with missing data in prevention research’, in K. Bryant, M. Windle, and S. West (eds.), New Methodological Approaches to Alcohol Prevention Research (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
  29. Gray, W. B.Jr.: 1975, How to Measure Readability (Dorrance and Company, Philadelphia).Google Scholar
  30. Gunning, J.: 1964, How to Take the Fog Out of Writing (Dartnell, Chicago).Google Scholar
  31. Gurin, G., Veroff, J., and Feld, S.: 1960, Americans View Their Mental Health (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  32. Headey, B., and Wearing, A.: 1989, ‘Personality, life events, and subjective well-being: Toward a dynamic equilibrium model’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57, pp. 731–739.Google Scholar
  33. Hertel, R. B.: 1976, ‘Minimizing error variance introduced by missing data routines in survey analysis’, Sociological Methods and Research 4, pp. 459–474.Google Scholar
  34. Hoppock, R.: 1935, Job Satisfaction (Harper, New York).Google Scholar
  35. Hudson, W. W., Harrison, D. F. and Crosscup, P. C.: 1981, ‘A short-form scale to measure discord in dyadic relationships’, The Journal of Sex Research 17, pp. 157–174.Google Scholar
  36. Jackson, D. N.: 1970, ‘A sequential system for personality scale development’ in C. D. Spielberger (ed.), Current Topics in Clinical and Community Psychology: Vol. 2 (Academic Press, New York), pp. 61–96.Google Scholar
  37. Jöreskog, K., and Sörbom, D.: 1993, LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language (Scientific Software International, Chicago, IL).Google Scholar
  38. Kral, J. G., Sjostrom, L. V., and Sullivan, M. B. E.: 1992, ‘Assessment of quality of life before and after surgery for severe obesity’, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 55, pp. 611S-614S.Google Scholar
  39. Larsen, R. J., Diener, E., and Emmons, R. A.: 1985, ‘An evaluation of subjective well-being measures’, Social Indicators Research 17, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
  40. Larson, R.: 1978, ‘Thirty years of research on the subjective well-being of older Americans’, Journal of Gerontology 33, pp. 109–125.Google Scholar
  41. Lawton, M. P.: 1983, ‘The varieties of well-being’, Experimental Aging Research 9, pp. 65–72.Google Scholar
  42. Little, R. J. A., and Rubin, D. B.: 1987, Statistical Analysis With Missing Data (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  43. Locke, H. J., and Wallace, K. M.: 1959, ‘Short marital-adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity’, Marriage and Family Living 21, pp. 251–255.Google Scholar
  44. Marcantonio, R. J.: 1995, ESTIMATE: Statistical Software Designed to Estimate the Impact of Missing Data [Computer program] (SciTech International, Inc., Chicago, IL).Google Scholar
  45. Marsh, H. W.: 1991, Self-Description Questionnaire (SDQ) III: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of late adolescent self-concept: An interim test manual and a research monograph. (Macarthur, University of Western Sydney).Google Scholar
  46. McLaughlin, G. H.: 1969, ‘SMOG Grading—a new readability formula’, Journal of Reading 12, pp. 639–646.Google Scholar
  47. Myers, D. G., and Diener, E.: 1995, ‘Who is happy?’ Psychological Science 6, pp. 10–19.Google Scholar
  48. Nunnally, J. C., and Bernstein, I. H.: 1994, Psychometric Theory (McGraw Hill, New York), pp. 90–94.Google Scholar
  49. Okun, M. A., Kardash, C. A., Stock, W. A., Sandler, I. N., and Baumann, D. J.: 1986, ‘Measuring perceptions of the quality of academic life among college students’. Journal of College Student Personnel 27, pp. 447–451.Google Scholar
  50. Okun, M. A., and Stock, W. A.: 1987, ‘The construct validity of subjective well-being measures: An assessment via quantitative research syntheses’, Journal of Community Psychology 15, pp. 481–492.Google Scholar
  51. Olson, D. H., Portner, J., and Lavee, Y.: 1985, FACES III (Family Social Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN).Google Scholar
  52. Paulhus, D. L.: 1991, ‘Measurement and control of response bias’, in J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, and L. W. Wrightsman (eds.), Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes (Academic Press, New York), pp. 17–59.Google Scholar
  53. Pavot, W., and Diener, E.: 1993, ‘Review of the Satisfaction With Life Scale’, Psychological Assessment 5, pp. 164–172.Google Scholar
  54. Pavot, W., Diener, E., Colvin, C. R., and Sandvik, E.: 1991, ‘Further validation of the Satisfaction With Life Scale: Evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being measures’, Journal of Personality Assessment 57, pp. 149–161.Google Scholar
  55. Rosenberg, M.: 1965, Society and the Adolescent Self-Image (Princeton University Press, Princeton).Google Scholar
  56. Rosenberg, M.: 1979, Conceiving the Self (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  57. Sandler, I. N.: 1981, August, On Buffers and Booster: Social Support for Negative and Positive Life Events, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, L.A.Google Scholar
  58. Sarason, I. G., Levine, H. M., Basham, R. B., and Sarason, B. R.: 1983, ‘Assessing social support: The social support questionnaire’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44, pp. 127–139.Google Scholar
  59. Schumm, W. R., McCollum, E. E., Bugaighis, M. A., Jurich, A. P., and Bollman, S. R.: 1986, ‘Characteristics of the Kansas Family Life Satisfaction Scale in a regional sample’, Psychological Reports 58, pp. 975–980.Google Scholar
  60. Schumm, W. R., Nichols, C. W., Shectman, K. L., and Grigsby, C. C.: 1983, ‘Characteristics of responses to the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale by a sample of 84 married mothers’, Psychological Reports 53, pp. 567–572.Google Scholar
  61. Schwarz, N., and Strack, F.: 1991, ‘Evaluating one's life: A judgment model of subjective well-being’, in F. Strack, M. Argyle, and N. Schwarz (eds.), Subjective Well-being: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK), pp. 27–48.Google Scholar
  62. Secord, P. F., and Jourard, S. M.: 1953, ‘The appraisal of body-cathexis: Body-cathexis and the self’, Journal of Consulting Psychology 17, pp. 343–347.Google Scholar
  63. Smith, P. C., Kendall, L. M., and Hulin, C. L.: 1969. The Measurement of Satisfaction in Work and Retirement (Rand McNally, Chicago).Google Scholar
  64. Spanier, G. B.: 1976, ‘Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads’, Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 38, pp. 15–38.Google Scholar
  65. Starr, A. M., Betz, E. L., and Menne, J. W.: 1983, Manual: College Student Satisfaction Questionnaire (rev. ed.) (Central Iowa Associates, Ames, IA).Google Scholar
  66. Stock, W. A., Okun, M. A., and Benin, M.: 1986, ‘Structure of subjective well-being among the elderly’, Psychology and Aging 1, pp. 91–102.Google Scholar
  67. Strack, F., Argyle, M., and Schwarz, N.: 1991, Subjective Well-being: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (Pergamon Press, New York).Google Scholar
  68. Stunkard, A. J., and Wadden, T. A.: 1992, ‘Psychological aspects of severe obesity’, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 55, pp. 524S-532S.Google Scholar
  69. Taylor, S. E., and Brown, J. D.: 1988, ‘Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health’, Psychological Bulletin 103, pp. 193–210.Google Scholar
  70. Taylor, S. E., and Brown, J. D.: 1994, ‘Positive illusions and well-being revisited: Separating fact from fiction’, Psychological Bulletin 116, pp. 21–27.Google Scholar
  71. Tekfi, C.: 1987, ‘Readability formulas: An overview’, Journal of Documentation 43, pp. 257–269.Google Scholar
  72. Thompson, J. K.: 1995, ‘Assessment of body image’, in David B. Allison (ed.), Handbook of Assessment Methods for Eating Behaviors and Weight-related Problems: Measures, Theory, and Research (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), pp. 119–148.Google Scholar
  73. Tracey, T. J., and Dundon, M.: 1988, ‘Role anticipations and preferences over the course of counseling’, Journal of Counseling Psychology 35, pp. 3–14.Google Scholar
  74. Veenhoven, R.: 1984, Conditions of Happiness (Kluwer-Boston, Hingham, MA).Google Scholar
  75. Velicer, W. F., Fava, J. L., Zwick, W. R., and Harrop, J. W.: 1988, Program CAX (Component Analysis Extended) [Computer program].Google Scholar
  76. Weiss, D. J., Dawis, R. V., England, G. W., and Lofquist, L. H.: 1967, Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. Minnesota Studies in Vocational Rehabilitation, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  77. Wylie, C.: 1989, Measures of Self-Concept (University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln).Google Scholar
  78. Zwick, W. R., and Velicer, W. F.: 1986, ‘Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain’, Psychological Bulletin 99, pp. 432–442.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vincent C. Alfonso
    • 1
  • David B. Allison
    • 1
  • Damon E. Rader
    • 1
  • Bernard S. Gorman
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of EducationFordham UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations