Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 117–136 | Cite as

Polygyny in the Neotropical termite Nasutitermes corniger: life history consequences of queen mutualism

  • Barbara L. Thorne


ecological aspects of monogyny and polygyny in social insect colonies are important in comparing individual queen reproductive success. Inseminated, fecund, multiple foundresses are common in some groups of ants and eusocial wasps, but true polygyny in termites has not previously been studied. One third of Nasutitermes corniger (Isoptera: Termitidae) colonies sampled in areas of young second growth in Panama contained from 2–33 primary queens (not supplementary or neotenic reproductives). All queens in polygynous associations were fully pigmented, physogastric egg layers within a single royal cell. Multiple kings were found less frequently; true polyandry is apparently restricted to immature polygynous colonies.

Data on queen weight and morphological features, and on colony composition, show that queens in polygynous nests are young and that a transition from polygyny to monogyny probably occurs after several years. The escalated growth rate of multiple queen colonies removes them from the vulnerable incipient colony size class more rapidly than colonies initiated by a single foundress, and gives them sufficient neuter support staff (workers and soldiers) to enable earlier production of fertile alates. Using a population model (Leslie matrix) I construct isoclines of equal population growth which show values of early age class probability of survival and reproductive output favoring monogyny or polygyny under individual selection. This model of queen mutualism accounts for the risk of a female in a polygynous group not succeeding as the final surviving queen.

Multiple primary queens are considered rare in termites, but a review of the literature demonstrates that they may be more widespread than is currently recognized. Polygyny in termites has received scant attention but is of significance as an example of a further ecological and evolutionary convergence between the phylogenetically independent orders Isoptera and Hymenoptera.


Life History Consequence Social Insect Coloni Leslie Matrix Polygynous Coloni Eusocial Wasp 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bartz SH, Hölldobler B (1982) Colony founding in Myrmecocystus mimicus Wheeler (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and the evolution of foundress associations. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10:137–147Google Scholar
  2. Brian MV (1965) Social insect populations. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Buschinger A (1974) Monogynie and Polygynie in Insektensozietäten. In: Schmidt GH (ed) Sozialpolymorphismus bei Insekten. Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft, Stuttgart, pp 862–896Google Scholar
  4. Coaton WGH (1949) Queen removal in termite control. Farm S Africa 24:335–338Google Scholar
  5. Craig R, Crozier RH (1979) Relatedness in the polygynous ant Myrmecia pilosula. Evol 33:335–341Google Scholar
  6. Darlington JPEC (1978) Populations of nests of Macrotermes species in Kajiado and Bissell. Annu Rep, Int Centre Insects Physiol Ecol 6:22–23Google Scholar
  7. Dietz HF, Snyder TE (1923) Biological notes on the termites of the Canal Zone and adjoining parts of the Republic of Panama. US Dept Agric J Agric Res 26:279–302Google Scholar
  8. Dudley PH, Beaumont J (1889a) The termites or so-called “white ants” of the Isthmus of Panama. J NY Microsc Soc 5:56–70, 111–112Google Scholar
  9. Dudley PH, Beaumont J (1889b) Observations on the termites, or white-ants of the Isthmus of Panama. Trans NY Acad Sci 1:85–114Google Scholar
  10. Fletcher DJC, Blum MS (1983) Regulation of queen number by workers in colonies of social insects. Science 219:312–314Google Scholar
  11. Gamboa GJ (1978) Intraspecific defense: Advantage of social cooperation among paper wasp foundresses. Science 199:1463–1465Google Scholar
  12. Gamboa GJ, Heacock BD, Wiltjer SL (1978) Division of labor and subordinate longevity in foundress associations of the paper wasp Polistes metricus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). J Kans Entomol Soc 51:343–352Google Scholar
  13. Gibo DL (1974) A laboratory study on the selective advantage of foundress associations in Polistes fuscatus. Can Entomol 106:101–106Google Scholar
  14. Gibo DL (1978) The selective advantage of foundress associations in Polistes fuscatus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae): A field study of the effects of predation on productivity. Can Entomol 110:519–540Google Scholar
  15. Harms JW (1927) Koloniegründung bei Macrotermes gilvus Hag. Zool Anz 74:221–236Google Scholar
  16. Hegh E (1922) Les termites. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  17. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1977) The number of queens: An important trait in ant evolution. Naturwissenschaften 64:8–15Google Scholar
  18. Holmgren N (1912) Termites from British India (Bombay) collected by Dr. J. Assmuth, S.J. J Bombay Nat Hist Soc 21:774–793Google Scholar
  19. Jeanne RL (1972) Social biology of the Neotropical wasp Mischocyttarus drewseni. Bull Mus Comp Zool 144:63–140Google Scholar
  20. Kaiser P (1956) Die Hormonalorgane der Termiten mit der Entstehung ihrer Kasten. Mitt Hamburgischen Zool Ms Inst 54:129–178Google Scholar
  21. Klahn JE (1979) Philopatric and nonphilopatric foundress associations in the social wasp Polistes fuscatus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 5:417–424Google Scholar
  22. Leslie PH (1945) On the use of matrices in certain population mathematics. Biometrika 33:183–212Google Scholar
  23. Leslie PH (1948) Some further notes on the use of matrices in population mathematics. Biometrika 35:213–245Google Scholar
  24. Litte M (1977) Behavioral ecology of the social wasp Mischocyttarus mexicanus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:229–246Google Scholar
  25. Metcalf RA, Whitt GS (1977a) Intra-nest relatedness in the social wasp Polistes metricus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:339–351Google Scholar
  26. Metcalf RA, Whitt GS (1977b) Relative inclusive fitness in the social wasp Polistes metricus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:353–360Google Scholar
  27. Michener CD (1974) The social behavior of the bees. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
  28. Miller EM (1969) Caste differentiation in the lower termites. In: Krishna K, Weesner FM (eds) Biology of termites, vol I. Academic Press, New York, pp 283–310Google Scholar
  29. Nel JJC (1968) Aggressive behavior of the havester termites Hodotermes mossambicus (Hagen) and Trinervitermes trinervoides (Sjöstedt) Insectes Soc 15:145–156Google Scholar
  30. Noirot C (1956) Les sexués de remplacement chez les termites supérieurs (Termitidae). Insectes Soc 3:145–158Google Scholar
  31. Noirot C (1969) Formation of castes in higher termites. In: Krishna K, Weesner FM (eds) Biology of termites, vol I. Academic Press, New York, pp 311–350Google Scholar
  32. Nutting WL (1969) Flight and colony foundation. In: Krishna K, Weesner FM (eds) Biology of termites, vol I. Academic Press, New York, pp 233–282Google Scholar
  33. Nutting WL (1970) Composition and size of some termite colonies in Arizona and Mexico. Ann Entomol Soc Am 63:1105–1110Google Scholar
  34. Oster GF, Wilson EO (1978) Caste and ecology in the social insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  35. Prestwich GD (1983) Chemical systematics of termite exocrine secretions. Annu Rev Ecol Syst (in press)Google Scholar
  36. Roonwal ML, Gupta SD (1952) An unusual royal chamber with two kings and two queens in the Indian mound-building termite Odontotermes obesus (Rambur) (Isoptera, Termitidae). J Bombay Nat Hist Soc 51:293–294Google Scholar
  37. Roy-Noël J (1974) Contribution a la connaissance des reproducteurs de remplacement chez les Termites supérieurs: observations sur Bellicositermes natalensis (Macrotermitinae). C R Acad Sci 278(D):481–482Google Scholar
  38. Thorne BL (1982a) Polygyny in termites: multiple primary queens in colonies of Nasutitermes corniger (Motschulsky) (Isoptera: Termitidae). Insectes Soc 29:102–117Google Scholar
  39. Thorne BL (1982b) Reproductive plasticity in the Neotropical termite Nasutitermes corniger. In: Jaisson P (ed) Social insects in the tropics, vol I. Université Paris-Nord, Paris, pp 22–29Google Scholar
  40. Thorne BL (1982c) Multiple primary queens in termites: phyletic distribution, ecological context and a comparison to polygyny in Hymenoptera. In: Breed MD, Michener CD, Evans HE (eds) The biology of social insects. Westview Press, Boulder, Colo, pp 206–211Google Scholar
  41. Thorne BL (1982d) Termite-termite interactions: workers as an agonistic caste. Psyche 89:133–150Google Scholar
  42. Thorne BL (1983a) Alate production and sex ratio in colonies of the Neotropical termite Nasutitermes corniger (Isoptera; Termitidae). Oecologia (Berl) 58:103–109Google Scholar
  43. Thorne BL (1983b) Population dynamics and reproductive biology of Neotropical Nasutitermes (Isoptera; Termitidae). PhD thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
  44. Thorne BL, Noirot C (1982) Ergatoid reproductives in Nasutitermes corniger (Motschulsky): Isoptera, Termitidae. Int J Insect Morphol Embryol 11:213–226Google Scholar
  45. Turrilazzi S, Pardi L (1977) Body size and heirarchy in polygynic nests of Polistes gallicus (L.) (Hymenoptera: Vespicae). Monit Zool Ital NS 11:101–112Google Scholar
  46. Waloff N (1957) The effect of the number of queens of the ant Lasius flavus (Fab.) Hym. Formicidae) on their survival and on the rate of development of the first brood. Insectes Soc 4:391–408Google Scholar
  47. Warren E (1909) Notes on the life histories of Natal termites, based on the observations of the late G.D. Haviland. Ann Natal Mus 2:113–128Google Scholar
  48. West MJ (1967) Foundress associations in polistine wasps: dominance hierarchies and the evolution of social behavior. Science 157:1584–1585Google Scholar
  49. West-Eberhard MJ (1969) The social biology of polistine wasps. Misc Publ Mus Zool Univ Mich 140:1–101Google Scholar
  50. West-Eberhard MJ (1973) Monogyny in “polygynous” social wasps. Proc VII Int Congr IUSSI, London, pp 396–403Google Scholar
  51. West-Eberhard MJ (1977) The establishment of reproductive dominance in social wasp colonies. Proc VIII Int Congr IUSSI, Wageningen, pp 223–227Google Scholar
  52. West-Eberhard MJ (1978a) Polygyny and the evolution of social behavior in wasps. J Kans Entomol Soc 51:832–856Google Scholar
  53. West-Eberhard MJ (1978b) Temporary queens in Metapolybia wasps: Nonreproductive helpers without altruism? Science 200:441–443Google Scholar
  54. West-Eberhard MJ (1982) The nature and evolution of swarming in tropical social wasps (Vespidae, Polistinae, Polybiini). In: Jaisson P (ed) Social insects in the tropics, vol. I. Université Paris-Nord, Paris, pp 97–128Google Scholar
  55. Weyer F (1930) Beobachtungen über die Entstehung neuer Kolonien bei tropischen Termiten. Zool Jahrb (Syst) 60:327–380Google Scholar
  56. Wilson EO (1966) Behaviour of social insects. Symp R Entomol Soc (Lond) 3:81–96Google Scholar
  57. Wilson EO (1974) The population consequences of polygyny in the ant Leptothorax curvispinosus. Ann Entomol Soc Am 67:781–786Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara L. Thorne
    • 1
  1. 1.Museum of Comparative ZoologyHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations