Sex Roles

, Volume 7, Issue 6, pp 637–641 | Cite as

Does this “he or she” business really make a difference? The effect of masculine pronouns as generics on job attitudes

  • Anne Stericker
Brief Report


Sixty-six female and 66 male undergraduates read six job descriptions referring to the jobholder(s) either as “he,” “he or she,” or “they.” Following each description subjects indicated their interest both in the job and a related job category, and estimated how difficult the job would be to get for a (1) Black person, (2) Mexican-American person, (3) woman, (4) person over age 60, (5) handicapped person, and (6) man. There were no main effects for pronoun condition, but several sex of subject × pronoun interactions. Significant effects for females generally supported the notion that use of masculine pronouns to refer to people in general narrows the reader's attitudes toward the topic in question, while corresponding results for males did not.


Social Psychology Handicapped Person Black Person Description Subject Male Undergraduate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Carmichael, L., Hogan, H. P., & Walter, A. A. An experimental study of the effect of language on the reproduction of visually perceived forms. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1932, 15, 73–86.Google Scholar
  2. Encyclopedia of careers and vocational guidance (Vol. 2). Chicago: Ferguson, 1975.Google Scholar
  3. Glucksberg, S., & Weisberg, R. W. Verbal behavior and problem solving: Some effects of labelling in a functional fixedness problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966, 71, 659–664.Google Scholar
  4. Kidd, V. A study of images produced through the use of the male pronoun as a generic. Moments in Contemporary Rhetoric and Communication, 1971, 1, 25–29.Google Scholar
  5. Schneider, J. W., & Hacker, S. L. Sex role imagery and use of the generic “man” in introductory texts: A case in the sociology of sociology. American Sociologist, 1973, 8, 12–18.Google Scholar
  6. Vestewig, R. E., & Stericker, A. B. A caveat on the use of rating scales to assess masculinity and femininity. Social Behavior and Personality, 1978, 6, 101–104.Google Scholar
  7. Whorf, B. L. Science and linguistics. In J. B. Carroll (Ed.), Language, thought and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 1956, pp. 207–219.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne Stericker
    • 1
  1. 1.Wright State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations