, Volume 98, Issue 2, pp 129–143 | Cite as

Large-scale chromatin structural domains within mitotic and interphase chromosomes in vivo and in vitro

  • Andrew S. Belmont
  • Michael B. Braunfeld
  • John W. Sedat
  • David A. Agard


Higher-order chromatin structural domains approximately 130 nm in width are observed as prominent components of both Drosophila melanogaster and human mitotic chromosomes using buffer conditions which preserve chromosome morphology as determined by light microscopic comparison with chromosomes within living cells. Spatially discrete chromatin structural domains of similar size also exist as prominent components within interphase nuclei prepared under equivalent conditions. Examination of chromosomes during the anaphase-telophase transition suggests that chromosomes decondense largely through the progressive straightening or uncoiling of these large-scale chromatin domains. A quantitative analysis of the size distribution of these higher-order domains in telophase nuclei indicated a mean width of 126±36 nm. Three-dimensional views using stereopairs of chromosomes and interphase nuclei from 0.5 μm thick sections suggest that these large-scale chromatin domains consist of 30 nm fibers packed by tight folding into larger, linear, fiber-like elements. Reduction in vitro of either polyamine or divalent cation concentrations within two different buffer systems results in a loss of these large-scale domains, with no higher-order chromatin organization evident above the 20–30 nm fiber. Under these conditions the DNA distribution within mitotic chromosomes and interphase nuclei appears significantly diffuse relative to the appearance by light microscopy within living cells, or, by electron microscopy, within cells fixed directly without permeabilization in buffer. These results suggest that these large-scale chromatin structural domains are fundamental elements of chromosome architecture in vivo.


Interphase Nucleus Mitotic Chromosome Chromosome Morphology Prominent Component Interphase Chromosome 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adolph KW (1980) Organization of chromosomes in mitotic Hela cells. Exp Cell Res 125:95–103Google Scholar
  2. Agard DA (1984) Optical sectioning microscopy: cellular architecture in three-dimensions. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng 13:191–219Google Scholar
  3. Agard DA, Hiraoka Y, Shaw P, Sedat JW (1989) Fluorescence microscopy in three dimensions. Methods Cell Biol 30:353–377Google Scholar
  4. Belmont AS, Sedat JW, Agard DA (1987) A three-dimensional approach to mitotic chromosome structure: evidence for a complex hierarchical organization. J Cell Biol 105:77–92Google Scholar
  5. Burgoyne LA, Wagar MA, Atkinson MR (1971) Calcium dependent pairing of DNA synthesis in isolated rat liver nuclei. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 39:254–259Google Scholar
  6. Cremer T, Cremer C, Baumann H, Luedthe EK, Sperling K, Xorn C (1982) Rabl's model of the interphase chromosome arrangement tested in chinese hamster cells by premature chromosome condensation and laser-UV-microbeam experiments. Hum Genet 60:46–56Google Scholar
  7. Dupraw EJ (1965) Macromolecular organization of nuclei and chromosomes: a folded fibre model based on whole mount electron microscopy. Nature 206:338–343Google Scholar
  8. Elgin SCR, Miller DW (1978) Mass rearing of flies and mass production and harvesting of embryos. In: Ashburner M, Wright TRF (eds) The genetics and biology of Drosophila, vol 2a. Academic Press, London, New York, San Francisco, pp 112–120Google Scholar
  9. Foe VE, Alberts BM (1983) Studies of nuclear and cytoplasmic behavior during the five mitotic cycles that precede gastrulation in Drosophila embryogenesis. J Cell Sci 61:31–70Google Scholar
  10. Halfer C, Barigozzi C (1973) Prophase synapsis in somatic cells of Drosophila melanogaster. Chromosomes Today 4:181–186Google Scholar
  11. Hanson CV (1978) Mass isolation of metaphase chromosomes from Drosophila melanogaster. In: Ashburner M, Wright TRF (eds) The genetics and biology of Drosophila, vol 2a. Academic Press, London, New York, San Francisco, pp 140–145Google Scholar
  12. Hayat MA (1981) Principles and techniques of electron microscopy — Biological applications, vol 1, 2nd edition. University Park Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  13. Hiraoka Y, Sedat JW, Agard DA (1987) The use of a charge-coupled device for quantitative optical microscopy of biological structures. Science 238:36–41Google Scholar
  14. Kendall F, Swenson R, Rowinsky T, Borun T, Nicolini C (1977) Nuclear morphometry during the cell cycle. Science 196:1106–1109Google Scholar
  15. Langmore JP, Paulson JR (1983) Low angle X-ray diffraction studies of chromatin structure in vivo and in isolated nuclei and metaphase chromosomes. J Cell Biol 96:1120–1131Google Scholar
  16. Lewin B (1980) Gene expression 2. John Wiley and Sons, New York, Chichester, Brisbane, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  17. Marsden MPF, Laemmli UK (1979) Metaphase chromosome structure: evidence for a radial loop model. Cell 17:849–858Google Scholar
  18. Moroi Y, Hartman AL, Nakane PK, Tan EM (1981) Distribution of kinetochore (centromere) antigen in mammalian cell nuclei. J Cell Biol 90:254–259Google Scholar
  19. Nicolini C, Kazu A, Borun T, Baserga R (1975) Chromatin changes during the cell cycle. J Biol Chem 250:3381–3385Google Scholar
  20. Paulson JR, Langmore JP (1983) Low angle X-ray diffraction studies of Hela metaphase chromosomes: effects of histone phosphorylation and chromosome isolation procedures. J Cell Biol 96:1132–1137Google Scholar
  21. Pederson T (1972) Chromatin structure and the cell cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 69:2224–2228Google Scholar
  22. Rattner JB, Lin CC (1985) Radial loops and helical coils coexist in metaphase chromosomes. Cell 42:291–296Google Scholar
  23. Richmond TJ, Finch JT, Rushton B, Rhodes D, Klug A (1984) Structure of the nucleosome core particle at 7 Â resolution. Nature 311:532–537Google Scholar
  24. Sedat J, Manuelidis L (1978) A direct approach to the structure of eukaryotic chromosomes. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 42:331–350Google Scholar
  25. Skaer RJ, Whytock S (1976) The fixation of nuclei and chromosomes. J Cell Sci 20:221–231Google Scholar
  26. Skaer RJ, Whytock S (1977) Chromatin-like artifacts from nuclear sap. J Cell Sci 26:301–310Google Scholar
  27. Terasima T, Tolmach LJ (1963) Growth and nucleic acid synthesis in synchronously dividing populations of Hela cells. Exp Cell Res 30:344–362Google Scholar
  28. Tobey RA, Anderson EC, Peterson DF (1967) The effect of thymidine on the duration of G1 in chinese hamster cells. J Cell Biol 35:53–59Google Scholar
  29. Widom J (1986) Physicochemical studies of the folding of the 100 Â nucleosome filament into the 300 Â filament: cation dependence. J Mol Biol 190:411–424Google Scholar
  30. Widom J, Klug A (1985) Structure of the 300 Â chromatin filament: X-ray diffraction from oriented samples. Cell 43:207–213Google Scholar
  31. Williams S, Athey BD, Muglia LJ, Schappe RS, Gough AH, Langmore JP (1986) Biophys J 49:233–248Google Scholar
  32. Woodcock CLF, Frado L-LY, Rattner JB (1984) The higher-order structure of chromatin: evidence for a helical ribbon arrangement. J Cell Biol 99:42–52Google Scholar
  33. Zatsepina OV, Polyakov VYu, Chentsov YuS (1983) Chromonema and chromomere-structural units of mitotic and interphase chromosomes. Chromosoma 88:91–97Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew S. Belmont
    • 1
  • Michael B. Braunfeld
    • 1
  • John W. Sedat
    • 1
  • David A. Agard
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics and the Howard Hughes Medical InstituteUniversity of CaliforniaSan Francisco, San FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations