Chromosoma

, Volume 98, Issue 2, pp 81–85 | Cite as

A non-radioactive in situ hybridization method for the localization of specific RNAs in Drosophila embryos reveals translational control of the segmentation gene hunchback

  • Diethard Tautz
  • Christine Pfeifle
Article

Abstract

We have developed a non-radioactive in situ hybridization technique for the localization of RNA in whole mount Drosophila embryos. After fixation, whole embryos are hybridized in situ with a DNA probe which has been labeled with digoxygenin. The hybridization products are detected by using a phosphatase-coupled antibody against digoxygenin. In parallel experiments, embryos can be treated with an antibody directed against the corresponding protein product to allow the detection of its distribution using standard immunochemical techniques. We have used this approach to compare the spatial and temporal distribution patterns of the RNA and protein products of the segmentation gene hunchback (hb) during the early stages of embryogenesis. This comparison revealed translational control of the maternally derived hb mRNA, which was difficult to detect by conventional techniques. The non-radioactive in situ hybridization method is as sensitive as conventional methods, but is faster and easier to perform. This may make it a useful tool for a variety of other systems.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akam ME (1983) The location of Ultrabithorax transcripts in Drosophila tissue sections. EMBO J 2:2075–2084Google Scholar
  2. Akam ME (1987) The molecular basis for metameric pattern in the Drosophila embryo. Development 101:1–22Google Scholar
  3. Bender M, Horikami S, Cribbs D, Kaufman TC (1988) Identification and expression of the gap segmentation gene hunchback in Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Genet 9:715–732Google Scholar
  4. Driever W, Nüsslein-Volhard C (1988) A gradient of bicoid protein in Drosophila embryos. Cell 54:83–93Google Scholar
  5. Driever W, Nüsslein-Volhard C (1989) The bicoid protein is a positive regulator of hunchback transcription in the early Drosophila embryo. Nature 337:138–143Google Scholar
  6. Feinberg AP, Vogelstein B (1983) A technique for radiolabelling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Anal Biochem 132:6–13Google Scholar
  7. Foe VE, Alberts BM (1983) Studies of nuclear and cytoplasmic behavior during the five mitotic cycles that precede gastrulation in Drosophila embryogenesis. J Cell Sci 61:31–70Google Scholar
  8. Frohnhöfer HG, Nüsslein-Volhard C (1986) Organization of anterior pattern in the Drosophila embryo by the maternal gene bicoid. Nature 324:120–125Google Scholar
  9. Hafen E, Levine M, Garber RL, Gehring WJ (1983) An improved in situ hybridization method for the detection of cellular RNAs in Drosophila tissue sections and its application for localizing transcripts of the homoeotic Antennapedia gene complex. EMBO J 12:617–623Google Scholar
  10. Hülskamp M, Schröder C, Pfeifle C, Jäckle H, Tautz D (1989) Posterior segmentation of the Drosophila embryo in the absence of a maternal posterior organizer gene. Nature 338:629–632Google Scholar
  11. Ingham PW (1988) The molecular genetics of embryonic pattern formation in Drosophila. Nature 335:25–34Google Scholar
  12. Kuroiwa A, Hafen E, Gehring WJ (1984) Cloning and transcriptional analysis of the segmentation gene fushi tarazu of Drosophila. Cell 37:825–831Google Scholar
  13. Lawrence PA, Johnston P, Morata G (1986) Methods of marking cells. In: Roberts DB (ed) Drosophila, a practical approach, IRL Press, Oxford, pp 229–242Google Scholar
  14. Lehmann R, Nüsslein-Volhard C (1984) Hunchback, a gene required for segmentation of an anterior and posterior region of the embryo. Dev Biol 119:402–417Google Scholar
  15. Macdonald PM, Struhl G (1986) A molecular gradient in early Drosophila embryos and its role in specifying the body pattern. Nature 324:537–545Google Scholar
  16. Nauber U, Pankratz M, Kienlin A, Seifert E, Klemm U, Jäckle H (1988) Abdominal segmentation of the Drosophila embryo requires a hormone receptor like protein encoded by the gap gene knirps. Nature 336:489–492Google Scholar
  17. Nüsslein-Volhard C, Wieschaus E (1980) Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila. Nature 287:795–801Google Scholar
  18. Nüsslein-Vollhard C, Frohnhöfer HG, Lehmann R (1987) Determination of Anteroposterior polarity in Drosophila. Science 238:1675–1681Google Scholar
  19. Preiss A, Rosenberg UB, Kienlin A, Seifert E, Jäckle H (1985) Molecular genetics of Krüppel, a gene required for segmentation of the Drosophila embryo. Nature 313:27–32Google Scholar
  20. Schröder C, Tautz D, Seifert E, Jäckle H (1988) Differential regulation of the two transcripts from the Drosophila gap segmentation gene hunchback. EMBO J 7:2881–2887Google Scholar
  21. Tautz D (1988) Regulation of the Drosophila segmentation gene hunchback by two maternal morphogenetic centres. Nature 332:281–284Google Scholar
  22. Tautz D, Renz M (1983) An optimized freeze-squeeze method for the recovery of DNA fragments from agarose gels. Anal Biochem 132:14–19Google Scholar
  23. Tautz D, Lehmann R, Schnürch H, Schuh R, Seifert E, Kienlin A, Jones K, Jäckle H (1987) Fingerprotein of novel structure encoded by hunchback, a second member of the gap class of Drosophila segmentation genes. Nature 327:383–389Google Scholar
  24. Weiner AJ, Scott MP, Kaufmann TC (1984) A molecular analysis of fushi tarazu, a gene in Drosophila melanogaster that encodes a product affecting embryonic segment number and cell fate. Cell 37:843–851Google Scholar
  25. Wieschaus E, Nüsslein-Volhard C (1986) Looking at embryos. In: Roberts DB (ed) Drosophila, a practical approach. IRL Press, Oxford, pp 199–228Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diethard Tautz
    • 1
  • Christine Pfeifle
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Genetik und Mikrobiologie der Universität MünchenMünchen 19Germany

Personalised recommendations