Advertisement

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 175–187 | Cite as

Group size and foraging efficiency in yellow baboons

  • Peter B. Stacey
Article

Summary

I studied the foraging behaviour of adults in three different-sized groups of yellow baboons (Papio cynocephalus) at Amboseli National Park in Kenya to assess the relationship between group size and foraging efficiency in this species. Study groups ranged in size from 8 to 44 members; within each group, I collected feeding data for the dominant adult male, the highest ranking pregnant female, and the highest ranking female with a young infant. There were no significant differences between groups during the study in either the mean estimated energy value of the food ingested per day for each individual (385±27 kJ kg-1 day-1) or in the estimated energy expended to obtain that food (114±3 kJ kg-1 day-1). Mean foraging efficiency ratios, which reflect net energy gain per unit of foraging time, also did not vary as a function of the size of the group in which the baboons were living. There was substantial variation between days in the efficiency ratios of all animals; this was the result of large differences in energy intake rather than in the energy expended during foraging itself. The members of the smallest group spent on the average only one-half as much time feeding each day as did individuals in the two larger groups. However, they obtained almost as much energy while foraging, primarily because their rate of food intake while actually eating tended to be higher than the rate in the other groups. The baboons in the small group were observed closer to trees that they could climb to escape ground predators, and they also were more likely to sit in locations elevated above the ground while resting. Such differences would be expected if the members of the small group were less able to detect approaching predators than individuals that lived in the larger groups. The results of this study suggest that predator detection or avoidance, rather than increased foraging efficiency, may be the primary benefit of living in larger groups in this population.

Keywords

Small Group Group Size Energy Intake Substantial Variation Young Infant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander RD (1974) The evolution of social bahavior. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 5:325–384Google Scholar
  2. Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–267Google Scholar
  3. Altmann J (1980) Baboon mothers and infants. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Altmann SA (1974) Baboons, space, time and energy. Am Zool 14:221–248Google Scholar
  5. Altmann SA (1979) Baboon progressions: order or chaos? A study of one-dimensional group geometry. Anim Behav 27:46–80Google Scholar
  6. Altmann SA (in press) Foraging and nutrition in weanling baboons. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  7. Altmann SA, Altmann J (1970) Baboon ecology: African field research. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  8. Berger J (1978) Group size, foraging and antipredator ploys: an analysis of bighorn sheep decisions. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 4:91–99Google Scholar
  9. Bertram BCR (1978) Living in groups: predators and prey. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB Behavioral ecology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 64–96Google Scholar
  10. Bramblett CA (1969) Non-metric skeletal age changes in the Drajani baboon. Am J Phys Anthropol 30:161–172Google Scholar
  11. Caraco T (1979) Time budgeting and group size: a theory. Ecology 60:611–617Google Scholar
  12. Clutton-Brock TH (1977) Primate ecology. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Clutton-Brock TH, Harvey PH (1977) Primate ecology and social organization. J Zool Lond 183:1–39Google Scholar
  14. Coelho AM, Quick LB, Bramblett SS (1976) Resource availability and population density in primates: a sociobioenergetic analysis of the energy budgets of Guatemalan howler and spider monkeys. Primates 17:63–80Google Scholar
  15. Crampton EW, Harris LE (1979) Applied animal nutrition. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  16. Crook JH (1970) The socio-ecology of primates. In: Crook JH (ed) Social behavior in birds and mamals. Academic Press, New York, pp 102–106Google Scholar
  17. Crook JH (1972) Sexual selection, dimorphism, and social organization in the primates. In: Campbell BG (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971. Aldine, Chicago, pp 231–281Google Scholar
  18. DeVore I, Hall K (1965) Baboon ecology. In: DeVore I (ed) Primate behavior: field studies of monkeys and apes. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp 20–52Google Scholar
  19. Eisenberg JF, Muckenhirn NA, Rudran R (1972) The relation between ecology and social structure in primates. Science 176:863–874Google Scholar
  20. Hausfater G (1975) Dominance and reproduction in baboons: a quantitative analysis. Contrib Primatol 7Google Scholar
  21. Hausfater G (1976) Predatory behavior of yellow baboons. Behaviour 56:44–68Google Scholar
  22. Iwamoto T (1979) Feeding ecology. In: Kawai M (ed) Ecological and sociological studies of gelada baboons. Contrib Primatol 16:279–330Google Scholar
  23. Jolly A (1972) The evolution of primate behavior. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Keppel G (1973) Design and analysis. A researcher's handbook. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  25. Kleiber M (1961) The fire of life. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Knapka JJ, Morin ML (1979) Open formula natural ingredient diets for non-human primates. In: Kayes KC (ed) Primates in nutritional rescarch. Academic, New York, pp 121–138Google Scholar
  27. Krebs J, MacRoberts M, Cullen J (1972) Flocking and feeding in the great tit Parus major: an experimental study. Ibis 114:507–530Google Scholar
  28. Lazarus J (1979) The early warning function of flocking in birds: an experimental study with captive Quelea. Anim Behav 27:855–865Google Scholar
  29. Leung WTL (1968) Food composition table for use in Africa. United States Department of Ariculture, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  30. Nagy KA, Milton K (1979) Energy metabolism and food consumption by wild howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata). Ecology 60:475–480Google Scholar
  31. Pitcher TJ, Magurran AE, Winfield IJ (1982) Fish in larger shoals find food faster. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10:149–151Google Scholar
  32. Post DG (1981) Activity patterns of yellow baboons (Papio cynocephalus) in the Amboseli National Park, Kenya. Anim Behav 29:357–374Google Scholar
  33. Post DG, Hausfater G, McCuskey S (1980) Feeding behaviour of yellow baboons (Papio cynocephalus): relationship to age, gender, and dominance rank. Folia Primatol 37:170–195Google Scholar
  34. Powell GUN (1974) Experimental analysis of the social value of flocking by starlings (Sturnus volgaris) in relation to predation and foraging. Anim Behav 22:501–508Google Scholar
  35. Pulliam HR, Caraco T (1984) Living in groups: is there an optimal group size? In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioral ecology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 123–147Google Scholar
  36. Pulliam HR, Millikan GC (1982) Social organization in the non-reproductive season. Avian Biol 6:169–197Google Scholar
  37. Rottenberry JT (1980) Dietary relationship among shrubsteppe passerine birds: competition or opportunism in a variable environment? Ecol Monogr 50:93–110Google Scholar
  38. Rowell T (1979) How would we know if social organization were not adaptive? In: Bernstein IS, Smith EO (eds) Primate ecology and human origins: ecological influences on social organization. Garland, New York, pp 1–22Google Scholar
  39. SAS Institute (1979) SAS User Guide. Helwig JT, Council KA (eds). SAS Institute, Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  40. Schaik CP van, Noordwijk MA van, Boer JR de, Tonkelaar I den (1983) The effect of group size on time budgets and social behavior in wild long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 13:173–181Google Scholar
  41. Schaik CP van (1983) Why are diurnal primates living in groups?. Behaviour 87:120–144Google Scholar
  42. Schoener TW (1971) Theory of feeding stategies. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 2:369–404Google Scholar
  43. Stander JM (1970) Diversity and similarity of benthic fauna off Oregon. Thesis. Oregon State University, CorvallisGoogle Scholar
  44. Stelzner JK, Strier K (1981) Hyena predation on an adult male baboon. Mammalia 45:259–260Google Scholar
  45. Sullivan KA (1984) The advantages of social foraging in downy woodpeckers. Anim Behav 32:16–22Google Scholar
  46. Terborgh J (1983) Five new world primates: a study in comportative ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  47. Treisman M (1975) Predation and the evolution of gregariousness. II. An economic model for predator-prey interactions. Anim Behav 23:801–825Google Scholar
  48. Thompson WA, Vertinsky I, Krebs JR (1974) The survival value of flocking in birds: a simulation model. J Anim Ecol 43:785–820Google Scholar
  49. Travis J (1982) A method for the statistical analysis of time-energy budgets. Ecology 62:19–25Google Scholar
  50. Tucker VA (1979) Energetic cost of locomotion in animals. J Comp Biochem Physiol 34:841–846Google Scholar
  51. Waser PM (1977) Feeding, ranging, and group size in the mangabey, Cercocebus albigena. In: Clutton-Brock TE (ed) Primate ecology, Academic, London, pp 183–222Google Scholar
  52. Western D, Praet C van (1973) Cyclical changes in the habitat and climate of an east African ecosystem. Nature 241:104–106Google Scholar
  53. Wrangham RW (1980) An ecological model of female-bonded primate groups. Behaviour 75:262–300Google Scholar
  54. Zar JH (1974) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter B. Stacey
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Life SciencesIndiana State UniversityTerre HauteUSA

Personalised recommendations