Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 191–201 | Cite as

Multiple mating and the evolution of social behavior in the hymenoptera

  • Blaine J. Cole


The data on the frequency of mating by queens of eusocial Hymenoptera are reviewed.

It is pointed out that the issue of sperm clumping is probably irrelevant to the evolution of eusociality.

The hypothesis is presented that multiple mating is an adaptation for maintaining large colonies. In ants there is a significant relation between the size of the colony and the frequency of mating.

The effect of multiple mating on the spread of a gene for worker behavior is explored. If a female mates twice, the effective number of matings is less than two except in the case of identical sperm contribution by the males.

Sperm bias is defined as the contribution of unequal amounts of sperm by the males that mate with a queen. Sperm bias can be produced as a sampling phenomenon, by inter-male competition for females and by sperm competition.

The relation between the ergonomic efficiency of the workers at the production of reproductives and the number of matings that is consistent with the evolution of eusociality is derived. If workers are only about 10% more efficient at producing reproductives within a eusocial colony than they are solitarily, then two matings by the queen will still produce a selective advantage to eusocial behavior.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alexander RD, Sherman PW (1977) Local mate competition and parental investment in social insects. Science 196:494–500Google Scholar
  2. Barrows EM (1975) Mating behavior in halictine bees (Hymen: Halictidae) III. Copulatory behavior and olfactory communication. Insectes Soc 22:307–331Google Scholar
  3. Barrows EM, Chabot MR, Michener CD, Snyder TP (1979) Foraging and mating behavior in Perdita texana. J Kans Entomol Soc 49:275–179Google Scholar
  4. Batra SWT (1966) Life cycle and behavior of the primitively social bee Lasioglossum zephyrum. Univ Kans Sci Bull 46:359–423Google Scholar
  5. Batra SWT (1978) Aggression, territoriality, mating and nest aggregation of some solitary bees. J Kans Entomol Soc 51:547–559Google Scholar
  6. Brian MV (1950) The stable winter population structure i species of Myrmica. J Anim Ecol 19:119–123Google Scholar
  7. Brian MV (1957) The growth and development of colonies of the ant Myrmica. Insectes Soc 4:177–190Google Scholar
  8. Brian MV (1965) Social insect populations Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Brothers DJ (1972) Biology and immature stages of Pseudomethoca f. frigida with notes on other species (Hymenoptera: Mutillidae). Univ Kans Sci Bull 50:1–38Google Scholar
  10. Carpenter FW, Hermann HR (1979) Antiquity of sociality in insects. In: Hermann HR (ed) Social insects, vol 1. Academic Press, New York, pp 81–89Google Scholar
  11. Charnov EL (1978a) Sex ratio selection in eusocial hymenoptera. Am Nat 112:317–326Google Scholar
  12. Charnov EL (1978b) Evolution of eusocial behavior: offspring choice or parental parasitism? J Theor Biol 75:451–465Google Scholar
  13. Craig R, Crozier RH (1979) Relatedness in the polygynous ant Myrmecia pilosula. Evolution 33:335–341Google Scholar
  14. Crozier RH (1973) Apparent differential selection at an isozyme locus between queens and workers of the ant Aphaenogaster rudis. Genetics 73:313–318Google Scholar
  15. Crozier RH (1977) Genetic differentiation between populations of the ant Aphaenogaster rudis in the southeastern United States Genetica 47:17–36Google Scholar
  16. DaSilva DL, Zucchhi NR, Kerr WE (1972) Biological and behavioral aspects of reproduction in some species of Melipona (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Meliponinae). Anim Behav 20:123–132Google Scholar
  17. Davidson DW (1982) Sexual selection in harvester ants [Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Pogonomyrmex]. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10:245–250Google Scholar
  18. Donisthorpe H St JK (1915) British ants. Brendon, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  19. Forel A (1928) The social world of ants, vol II (Translated by Ogden CK). Putnam, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Greene A, Akre RD, Landolt PJ (1978) Behavior of the yellow-jecket social parasite Dolichovespula arctica (Rohmer) Melanderia 29:1–28Google Scholar
  21. Halliday RB (1975) Electrophoretic variation of amylase in meat ants, Irdomyrmex purpureus, and its taxonomic significance. Aust J Zool 23:271–276Google Scholar
  22. Halliday RB (1979) Esterase variation at three loci in meat ants. J Hered 70:57–61Google Scholar
  23. Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical theory of social behavior. I, II. J Theor Biol 7:1–52Google Scholar
  24. Hamilton WD (1972) Altruism and related phenomena, mostly in social insects. Annu Rev Syst Ecol 3:193–232Google Scholar
  25. Headley AE (1949) A population study of the ant Aphaenogster fulva ssp. aquia Buckley (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 42:265–272Google Scholar
  26. Hobbs GA (1967) Ecology of species of Bombus (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in southern Alberta. VI. Subgenus Pyrobombus. Can Entomol 99:1271–1292Google Scholar
  27. Hölldobler B (1976) The behavioral ecology of mating in harvester ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Pogonomyrmex). Behav Ecol and Sociobiol 1:405–423Google Scholar
  28. Hung AC-F, Vinson SB (1976) Biochemical evidence for queen monogamy and sterile male diploidy in the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta. Isozyme Bull 4:55Google Scholar
  29. Ito M, Imamura S (1974) Observations on the nuptial flight and internidal relationship in a polydomous ant, Formica yessensis Forel. J Fac Sci Hokkaido Univ Ser VI Zool 19:681–694Google Scholar
  30. Kannowski PB (1963) The flight activities of formicine ants. Symp Genet Biol (Italica) 12:74–102Google Scholar
  31. Kannowski PB, Kannowski P (1957) The mating activities of the ant Myrmica americana Weber, Ohio J Sci 57:371Google Scholar
  32. Kemper H, Dohring E (1961) Zur Frage nach der Volksstärke und der Vermehrungspotenz bei den sozialen Faltenwespen Deutschlands. Z Angew Zool 48:163–197Google Scholar
  33. Kemper H, Dohring E (1967) Die Sozialen Faltenwespen Mitteleuropas. Parey, Berlin HamburgGoogle Scholar
  34. Kerr W (1961) Acasalamento de rainhas com varios machos em duas especies da Tribu Attini (Hymenoptera, Formicidea). Rev Brasil Biol 21:45–48Google Scholar
  35. Kerr WE (1969) Some aspects of the evolution of social bees. Evol Biol 3:119–175Google Scholar
  36. Kerr W, Zucchi R, Nakadaira JT, Botolo JE (1962) Reproduction in the social bees. J NY Entomol Soc 70:265–76Google Scholar
  37. Lavigne R (1969) Bionomics and nest structure of Pogonomyrmex occidentalis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 62:1166–1175Google Scholar
  38. Lin N, Michener CD (1972) Evolution and selection in social insects. Q Rev Biol 47:131–159Google Scholar
  39. Lindauer M, Kerr W (1960) Communication between the workers of stingless bees. Bee World 41:29–41, 65–71Google Scholar
  40. MacDonald JF, Akre RD, Hill WB (1974) Comparative biology and behavior of Vespula atripilosa and V. pennsylvanica (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Melanderia 18:1–66Google Scholar
  41. MacKay WP (1981) A comparison of the nest phenologies of three species of Pogonomyrmex harvester ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Psyche 88:25–74Google Scholar
  42. Marchal P (1896) La reproduction et l'evolution des guepes sociales. Arch Zool Exp 4:1–100Google Scholar
  43. Marikovsky PI (1961) Material on sexual biology of the ant Formica rufa L. Insectes Soc 4:23–30Google Scholar
  44. Markin GP, Dillier JH, Collins HL (1973) Growth and development of colonies of the red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta. Ann Entomol Soc Am 66:803–808Google Scholar
  45. Metcalf RA (1980) Sex ratios, parent-offspring conflict and local competition for mates in the social wasps Polistes metricus and Polistes variatus. Am Nat 116:642–654Google Scholar
  46. Metcalf RA, Whitt GS (1977) Intra-nest relatedness in the social wasp Polistes metricus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:339–351Google Scholar
  47. Michener CD (1974) The social behavior of the bees: a comparative study. Harvard/Belknap Press, Cambridge (Massachusetts)Google Scholar
  48. Michener CD, Lange RB (1958) Observations on the ethology of neotropical anthophorine bees. Univ Kans Sci Bull 39:69–96Google Scholar
  49. Nagel HG, Rettenmeyer CW (1973) Nuptial flights, reproductive behavior and colony founding of the western harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex occidentalis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J Kans Entomol Soc 46:82–101Google Scholar
  50. Oster GF, Wilson EO (1978) Caste and ecology in the social insects. Monographs in population biology, vol 12. Princeton University Press, Princeton (New Jersey)Google Scholar
  51. Page RE (1982) Polyandry in Brachymyremex depilis emery (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Pan Pac Entomol (in press)Google Scholar
  52. Page RE, Metcalf RA (1982) Multiple mating, sperm utilization and social evolution. Am Nat 119:263–281Google Scholar
  53. Pamilo P, Rosengren R, Vepsalainen K, Varvio-Aho S-L, Pisarski B (1978) Population structure of Formica ants. I. Patterns of enzyme gene variation. Hereditas 89:233–248Google Scholar
  54. Pamilo P, Varvio-Aho S-L (1979) Genetic structure of nests in the ant Formica sanguinea. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 6:91–98Google Scholar
  55. Parker GA (1970) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol Rev 45:525–568Google Scholar
  56. Plateaux-Quenu C (1962) Biology of Halictus marginatus Brulle. J Apicult Res 1:44–51Google Scholar
  57. Pontin AJ (1978) The numbers and distribution of subterranean aphids and their exploitation by the ant Lasius flavus (Fabr.). Ecol Entomol 3:203–207Google Scholar
  58. Rettenmeyer CW (1963) Behavioral studies of army ants. Univ Kans Sci Bull 44:281–465Google Scholar
  59. Ribband CR (1953) The behavior and social life of honeybees. Bee Research Association, LondonGoogle Scholar
  60. Rogers L, Lavigne R, Miller JL (1972) Bioenergetics of the western harvester ant in the shortgrass plains ecosystem. Environ Entomol 1:763–8Google Scholar
  61. Scherba G (1961) Nest structure and reproduction in the mound-building ant Formica opaciventris Emery in Wyoming. J NY Entomol Soc 69:71–87Google Scholar
  62. Schnierla TC (1971) Army ants: a study in social organization. Topoff HR (ed). Freeman, San Francisco (California)Google Scholar
  63. Schulz-Langer E (1954) Beobachtungen zur Copulation gefangenegehaltener Wespen. Zool Anz 152:39–42Google Scholar
  64. Starr CK (1979) Origin and evolution of insect sociality: a review of modern theory. In: Hermann HR (ed) Social insects, vol I. Academic Press, New York, pp 35–79Google Scholar
  65. Stauffer HB (1979) A derivation for the Weibull distribution. J Ther Biol 81:55–63Google Scholar
  66. Taber S (1955) Sperm distribution in the spermathecae of multiplymated queen honeybees. J Econ Entomol 48:522–525Google Scholar
  67. Taber S IV, Wendel J (1958) Concerning the number of times queen bees mate. J Econ Entomol 51:786–789Google Scholar
  68. Talbot M (1943) Population studies of the ant, Prenolepis imparis Say. Ecology 24:31–44Google Scholar
  69. Talbot M (1945) A comparison of flights of four species of ants. Am Midl Nat 34:504–510Google Scholar
  70. Talbot M (1951) Populations and hibernating conditions of the ant Aphaenogaster (Attomyrma) rudis Emery (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 44:302–307Google Scholar
  71. Talbot M (1959) Flight activities of two species of ants of the genus Formica. Am Midl Nat 61:124–132Google Scholar
  72. Talbot M (1971) Flights of the ant Formica dakotensis Emery. Psyche 78:169–179Google Scholar
  73. Talbot M (1972) Flights and swarms of the ant Formica obscuripes Forel. J Kans Entomol Soc 45:254–258Google Scholar
  74. Thomas CR (1960) The European Wasp (Vespula germanica Fab.) in New Zealand. Inf Ser Dept Sci Ind Res (New Zealand) 27:1–74Google Scholar
  75. Trivers RL, Hare H (1976) Haplodiploidy and the evolution of social insects. Science 191:249–263Google Scholar
  76. Ward PS (1978) Genetic variation, colony structure and social behavior in the Rhytidoponera impressa group, a species complex of ponerine ants. Ph D dissertation, University of Sydney (Australia)Google Scholar
  77. Ward PS (1981) Ecology and life history of the Rhytidoponera impressa group (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) II. Colony origin, seasonal cycles and reproduction. Psyche 88:109–126Google Scholar
  78. Weber NA (1935) The biology of the thatching ant, Formica rufa obscuripes Forel, in North Dakota. Ecol Monogr 5:165–206Google Scholar
  79. Weber NA (1972) Gardening Ants: The Attines. American Philosophicl Society, Philadelphia (Pennsylvania)Google Scholar
  80. West-Eberhard MJ (1975) The evolution of social behavior by kin selection. Q Rev Biol 50:1–33Google Scholar
  81. Whitford WG, Bryant M (1979) Behavior of a predator and its prey: the horned lizard (Phrynosoma cornutum) and harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex spp.) Ecology 60:686–894Google Scholar
  82. Wildermuth VL, Davis EG (1931) The red harvester ant and how to subdue it. Farmer's Bull US Dept Agricult 1668:1–12Google Scholar
  83. Wilson EO (1957) The organization of a nuptial flight of the ant Pheidole sitarches Wheeler. Psyche 64:46–50Google Scholar
  84. Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Harvard/Belknap Press, Cambridge (Massachusetts)Google Scholar
  85. Woyke J (1973) Reproduction in Apis cerana. I. Mating behavior. J Apic Res 11:141–146Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Blaine J. Cole
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations