Sex Roles

, Volume 25, Issue 3–4, pp 225–235 | Cite as

Construct validity of a diagnostic ratio measure of gender stereotypes

  • Albert A. Cota
  • Anne Reid
  • Kenneth L. Dion
Article

Abstract

We examined the construct validity of C. L. Martin's [(1987), “A Ratio Measure of Sex Stereotyping,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 52, pp. 489–499] diagnostic ratio method for measuring consensual gender stereotypes and individual differences in gender stereotyping. This method is based on estimates that respondents make for percentages of men and women that possess gender stereotypic personality traits. Fifty-six women in introductory psychology completed a version of the diagnostic ratio measure of gender stereotypes, which consisted of eight stereotypically feminine traits and eight stereotypically masculine traits, and a measure of prescriptive beliefs about social roles of women and men. Results for consensual gender stereotypes replicated those of Martin. The psychometric properties of the measure for assessing individual differences in gender stereotyping were generally adequate for research purposes. A small but interpretable correlation was found between individual differences in gender stereotyping and individual differences in prescriptive beliefs about social roles for the sexes. The preceding findings increase confidence in Martin's procedure as a valuable measure of gender stereotypes and gender stereotyping.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ashmore, R. D., & Del Boca, F. K. (1979). Sex stereotypes and implicit personality theory: Toward a cognitive-social psychological conceptualization. Sex Roles, 5, 219–248.Google Scholar
  2. Ashmore, R. D., Del Boca, F. K., & Wohlers, A. J. (1986). Gender stereotypes. In R. D. Ashmore & F. K. Del Boca (Eds.), The social psychology of female-male relations: A critical analysis of central concepts. Orlando, FL: Academic.Google Scholar
  3. Bem, S. L. (1981). Bem Sex-Role Inventory: Professional manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists.Google Scholar
  4. Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. (1972). Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28(2), 59–78.Google Scholar
  5. Comprey, A. L. (1978). Common methodological problems in factor analytic studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 648–659.Google Scholar
  6. Cota, A. A. (1990). Social role theory of gender stereotypes: Implications for self- and target ratings. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  7. Cota, A. A., & Fekken, G. C. (1988) Dimensionality of the Personal Attributes Questionnaire: An empirical replication. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 3, 135–140.Google Scholar
  8. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.Google Scholar
  9. Deaux, K., & Lewis, L. L. (1983). Assessment of gender stereotypes: Methodology and components. Psychological Documents, 13, 25. (Ms. No. 2583).Google Scholar
  10. Dzuiban, C. D., & Shirkey, E. C. (1974). When is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis? Some decision rules. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 358–361.Google Scholar
  11. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Ellis, L. J., & Bentler, P. M. (1973). Traditional sex-determined role standards and sex stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 28–34.Google Scholar
  13. Etaugh, C. (1986, August). Biographical and personality correlates of attitudes toward women: A review. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  14. Helmreich, R. L., Spence, J. T., & Wilhelm, J. A. (1981). A psychometric analysis of the Personal Attributes Questionnaire. Sex Roles, 7, 1097–1108.Google Scholar
  15. Holden, R. R., Longman, R. S., Cota, A. A., & Fekken, G. C. (1989). PAR: Parallel analysis routine for random data eigenvalue estimation. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 192.Google Scholar
  16. Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185.Google Scholar
  17. Katz, D., & Braly, K. (1933). Racial stereotypes of one hundred college students. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 28, 280–290.Google Scholar
  18. Kaiser, H. F., & Rice, J. (1974). Little Jiffy, Mark IV. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 111–117.Google Scholar
  19. Kalin, R., & Tilby, P. J. (1978). Development and validation of a sex-role ideology scale. Psychological Reports, 42, 731–738.Google Scholar
  20. Larsen, K. S., & Long, E. (1988). Attitudes toward sex-roles: Traditional or egalitarian? Sex Roles, 19, 111–117.Google Scholar
  21. Longman, R. S., Cota, A. A., Holden, R. S., & Fekken, G. C. (1989). A regression equation for the parallel analysis criterion in principal components analysis: Mean and 95th percentile eigenvalues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 59–69.Google Scholar
  22. Lykken, D. T. (1968). Statistical significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 151–159.Google Scholar
  23. Martin, C. L. (1987). A ratio measure of sex stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 489–499.Google Scholar
  24. McCauley, C., & Stitt, C. L. (1978). An individual and quantitative measure of stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 929–940.Google Scholar
  25. McCauley, C., Stitt, C. L., & Segal, M. (1980). Stereotyping: From prejudice to prediction. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 195–208.Google Scholar
  26. Miller, A. G. (1982). Historical and contemporary perspectives on stereotyping. In A. G. Miller (Ed.), In the eye of the beholder: Contemporary issues in stereotyping. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  27. Spence, J. T. (1985). Gender identity and its implications for concepts of masculinity and femininity. In T. B. Sonderegger (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1984: Psychology and gender (Vol. 32). Lincoln: University of Nebraska.Google Scholar
  28. Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity & femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas.Google Scholar
  29. Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1975). Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 29–39.Google Scholar
  30. Tilby, P. J., & Kalin, R. (1980). Effects of sex-role deviant lifestyles in otherwise normal persons on the perception of maladjustment. Sex Roles, 6, 581–592.Google Scholar
  31. Velicer, W. F., & Jackson, D. N. (1990). Component analysis versus common factor analysis: Some issues in selecting an appropriate technique. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 1–28.Google Scholar
  32. Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 432–442.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Albert A. Cota
    • 1
  • Anne Reid
    • 1
  • Kenneth L. Dion
    • 1
  1. 1.University of TorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyJoyceville InstitutionKingstonCanada

Personalised recommendations