Abstract
The purpose of this study was to identify the extent to which stage of relationship development moderated the link between instrumentalness, expressiveness, and relationship satisfaction. Three hundred ninety three subjects indicated that they were either casually dating, seriously dating, or engaged. Results revealed that although relationship stage predicted satisfaction for both males and females, it did not interact significantly with instrumentalness and expressiveness and thus, did not serve a moderating function. Results also indicated that for males, self-perceptions of instrumentalness and expressiveness, as well as partner's perceived expressiveness predicted relationship satisfaction. For females, partner's perceived instrumentalness and expressiveness significantly predicted relationship satisfaction. Discussion centered on the different findings for males and females, and on implications for future research concerning the influence of instrumentalness and expressiveness on dyadic interaction.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antill, J. (1983). Sex role complementarily versus similarity in married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 145–155.
Baucom, D. H., & Aiken, P. A. (1984). Sex role identity, marital satisfaction and response to behavioral marital therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 155–162.
Bissonnette, V., Ickes, W., Bernstein, I., & Knowles, E. (1990). Personality moderating variables: A warning about statistical artifact and a comparison of analytic techniques. Journal of Personality, 58, 567–587.
Braiker, H., & Kelley, H. (1979). Conflict in the development of close relationships. In R. L. Burgess & T. L. Huston (eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships (pp. 135–168). New York: Academic Press.
Davidson, B., & Sollie, D. L. (1987). Sex role orientation and marital adjustment. Social Behavior and Personality, 15, 59–69.
Helmreich, R., Spence, J., & Wilhelm, J. (1981). A psychometric analysis of the Personal Attributes Questionnaire. Sex Roles, 7, 1097–1108.
Hendrick, S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 93–98.
Ickes, W. (1985). Sex-role influences on compatibility in relationships. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 187–208). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Ickes, W., & Barnes, R. (1978) Boys and girls together and alienated: On enacting stereotyped sex roles in mixed-sex dyads. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 669–683.
Ickes, W., Schermer, B., & Steeno, J. (1979). Sex and sex-role influences in same-sex dyads. Social Psychology Quarterly, 42, 373–385.
Kurlik, J., & Harackiewicz, J. (1979). Opposite-sex attraction as a function of the sex-role of the perceiver and the perceived. Sex Roles, 5, 443–452.
Kurdek, L., & Schmitt, J. (1986). Interaction of sex-role self concept with relationship quality and relationship beliefs in married, heterosexual cohabiting, gay, and lesbian couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 365–370.
Lamke, L., & Bell, N. (1982). Sex-role orientation and relationship development in same-sex dyads. Journal of Research in Personality, 16, 343–354.
Lamke, L. (1989). Marital adjustment among rural couples: The role of expressiveness. Sex Roles, 21, 579–590.
Milardo, R., Johnson, M., & Huston, T. (1983). Developing close relationships: Changing patterns of interaction between pair members and social networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 964–976.
Murstein, B., & Williams, P. (1983). Sex roles and marital adjustment. Small Group Behavior, 14, 77–94.
Pursell, S., & Banikiotes, P. (1978). Androgyny and initial interpersonal attraction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 235–239.
Orlofsky, J. (1982). Psychological androgyny, sex-typing, and sex-role ideology as predictors of male-female interpersonal attraction. Sex Roles, 8, 1057–1073.
Saunders, D. (1956). Moderator variables in prediction. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 16, 209–222.
Spence, J. (1979). The many faces of androgyny: A reply to Locksley and Colten. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1032–1046.
Spence, J., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1975). Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 29–39.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Siavelis, R.L., Lamke, L.K. Instrumentalness and expressiveness: Predictors of heterosexual relationship satisfaction. Sex Roles 26, 149–159 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289755
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289755