Gender differences in perceptions of emotionality: The case of close heterosexual relationships
- 287 Downloads
- 50 Citations
Abstract
Previous research suggests some support for the stereotype that women are the more emotional gender, but very little research has examined whether women are more emotional than men in the context of close relationships. We examined gender differences in reports of emotions experienced and expressed in close heterosexual relationships. A sample of 197 couples (at different stages of relationship involvement), most of whom were white and from middle-class backgrounds, responded to a list of 25 positive and negative emotions three times. Participants indicated how often they experienced the emotions, how often they expressed the emotions, and how often they believed their partner experienced the emotions (all in the past month). Women reported experiencing several emotions to a greater frequency than men, regardless of degree of relationship involvement. Further, women reported being more emotionally expressive than men in dating and more advanced (e.g., engaged) relationships, but not in marital relationships. Finally, women believed that they were generally more emotional than men, whereas men believed that women were more emotional in the experience of negative but not positive emotions. The results were generally consistent with the stereotype that females are the more emotional gender.
Keywords
Gender Difference Social Psychology Negative Emotion Positive Emotion Great FrequencyPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Allen, J. G., & Haccoun, D. M. (1976). Sex differences in emotionality: A multidimensional approach. Human Relations, 29, 711–722.Google Scholar
- Balswick, J. O. (1988). The inexpressive male. Lexington, MA: Lexington.Google Scholar
- Balswick, J., & Avertt, C. P. (1977). Differences in expressiveness: Gender, interpersonal orientation, and perceived parental expressiveness as contributing factors. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39, 121–127.Google Scholar
- Balswick, J. O., & Peek, C. (1977). The inexpressive male: A tragedy of American society. The Family Coordinator, 20, 363–368.Google Scholar
- Berscheid, E. (1983). Emotion. In H. H. Kelley, E. Berscheid, A. Christensen, J. H. Harvey, T. L. Huston, G. Levinger, E. McClintock, L. A. Peplau, and D. R. Peterson (Eds.), Close relationships. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
- Berscheid, E., Snyder, M., & Omoto, A. M. (1989). Issues in studying close relationships: Conceptualizing and measuring closeness. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Close relationships. Review of personality and social psychology, (Vol. 10, pp. 63–91). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Brehm, S. (1992). Intimate relationships (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Carlson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. (1972). Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 59–78.Google Scholar
- Buck, R. (1984). The communication of emotion. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Deaux, K. (1984). From individual differences to social categories: Analysis of a decade's research on gender. American Psychologist, 39, 105–116.Google Scholar
- Dion, K. K., & Dion, K. L. (1985). Personality, gender, and the phenomenology of romantic love. In P. Shaver (Ed.), Self, situation and social behavior. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Dosser, D. A., Jr., Balswick, J. O., & Halverson, C. F., Jr. (1986). Male inexpressiveness and relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 3, 241–258.Google Scholar
- Fitness, J., & Strongman, K. (1991). Affect in close relationships. In G. J. O. Fletcher & F. D. Fincham (Eds.), Affect in close relationships. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Hatfield, E, & Rapson, R. (1987). Gender differences in love and intimacy: The fantasy vs. the reality. In W. Ricketts & H. L. Gochros (Eds.), Intimate relationships. New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
- Heilbrun, A. B. (1976). Measurement of masculine and feminine sex role identities as independent dimensions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44, 183–190.Google Scholar
- Hendrick, C. (1988). Roles and gender in relationships. In S. W. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Huston, T. L., & Ashmore, R. D. (1986). Women and men in personal relationships. In R. D. Ashmore & F. L. Del Boca (Eds.), The social psychology of female-male relationships. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Kopper, B. A., & Epperson, D. L. (1991). Women and anger: Sex and sex-role comparisons in the expression of anger. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 7–14.Google Scholar
- LaFrance, M., & Banaji, M. (1992). Toward a reconsideration of the gender-emotion relationship. In M. S. Clark (Ed.), Emotion and social behavior. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, (Vol. 14, pp. 179–201). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Larsen, R. J., & Diener, E. (1987). Affect intensity as an individual difference characteristic: A review. Journal of Research in Personality, 21, 1–39.Google Scholar
- McNair, D. M., Lorr, M., & Droppleman, L. F. (1981). Manual for the Profile of Mood States (POMS). San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.Google Scholar
- Notarius, C. I., & Johnson, J. S. (1982). Emotional expression in husbands and wives. Journal of Marriage and Family, 44, 483–489.Google Scholar
- Peplau, L. A., & Gordon, S. L. (1985). Women and men in love: Gender differences in close heterosexual relationships. In V. E. O'Leary, R. K. Unger, & B. S. Wallston (Eds.), Women, gender, and social psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Rosenkrantz, P., Vogel, S., Bee, H., Broverman, I., & Broverman, D. M. (1968). Sex role stereotypes and self-concepts in college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 32, 287–295.Google Scholar
- Ross, C. E., & Mirowsky, J. (1984). Men who cry. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47, 138–146.Google Scholar
- Rubin, L. B. (1983). Intimate strangers: Men and women together. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- Schwartz, J. C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Emotions and emotion knowledge in interpersonal relations. In W. H. Jones & D. Perlman (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships. JAI Press.Google Scholar
- Sedikides, C., & Strube, M. J. (1993). Motivated self-perception: To thine own self be true, to thine own self be good, and to thine own self be sure. Manuscript under review, University of Wisconsin — Madison.Google Scholar
- Shields, S. A. (1986). Are women “emotional”? In C. Tavris (Ed.), Every woman's emotional well-being. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
- Shields, S. A. (1987). Women, men, and the dilemma of emotions. In P. Shaver & C. Hendrick (Eds.), Sex and gender. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Shimanoff, S. B. (1983). The role of gender in linguistic references to emotive states. Communication Quarterly, 31, 174–179.Google Scholar
- Shimanoff, S. B. (1985). Rules governing the verbal expression of emotions between married couples. The Western Journal of Speech Communication, 49, 147–165.Google Scholar
- Simpson, J. A. (1990). Influence of attachment styles on romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 971–980.Google Scholar
- Slevin, K. F., & Balswick, J. O. (1980). Children's perceptions of parental expressiveness. Sex Roles, 6, 293–299.Google Scholar
- Snell, W. E., Jr., Miller, R. S., & Belk, S. S. (1988). Development of the emotional self-disclosure scale. Sex Roles, 18, 59–73.Google Scholar
- Spielberger, C. D., Barker, L., Russell, S., Silva de Crane, R., Westberry, L., Knight, J., & Marks, E. (1979). Preliminary manual for the State-Trait Personality Inventory (STPI). Tampa: University of South Florida.Google Scholar
- Sprecher, S. (1986). The relation between inequity and emotions in close relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 49, 309–321.Google Scholar
- Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210.Google Scholar
- Wood, W., Rhodes, N., & Whelan, M. (1989). Sex differences in positive well-being: A consideration of emotional style and marital status. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 249–264.Google Scholar