Sex Roles

, Volume 27, Issue 1–2, pp 17–37 | Cite as

Self-stereotyping, sex role ideology, and menstrual attitudes: A social identity approach

  • Elizabeth A. Hardie
  • Nancy E. McMurray
Article

Abstract

Two studies were conducted to explore the effects of self-stereotyping (SS) and sex role ideology (SRI) on Australian women's menstrual attitudes. In Study 1 a sample of undergraduate women at a small regional college showed significant menstrual attitude differences when grouped according to Traditional, Moderate, and Feminist SRI. In Study 2 the SRI effect was replicated in a more ethnically diverse sample of undergraduate women at a large metropolitan university. Women's own attitudes were separated from their stereotyped beliefs about most women and further analyses were conducted within the framework of social identity theory to explore the role self-stereotyping. The hypothesis that the difference between women's own menstrual attitudes and their ratings of most women's attitudes would vary as a function of degree of SS and perceived Prototype was supported. Further research is needed to clarify the SS bias.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (1990). Social identification, self-categorization and social influence. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology- Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Antill, J. K., Cunningham, J. D., Russell, G., & Thompson, N. L. (1981). An Australian sex-role scale. Australian Journal of Psychology, 33, 169–183.Google Scholar
  3. Ashmore, R. D. (1981). Sex stereotypes and implicit personality theory. In D. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Aubouchon, P. G., & Calhoun, K. S. (1985). Menstrual cycle symptomatology: The role of social expectancy and experimental demand characteristics. Psychosomatic Medicine, 47, 35–45.Google Scholar
  5. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.Google Scholar
  6. Brooks, J., Ruble, D., & Clarke, A. (1977). College women's attitudes and expectations concerning menstrual related changes. Psychosomatic Medicine, 39, 288–298.Google Scholar
  7. Brooks-Gunn, J., & Ruble, D. N. (1980). The Menstrual Attitude Questionnaire. Psychosomatic Medicine, 42, 503–512.Google Scholar
  8. Chernovetz, M. E., Jones, W. H., & Hannson, R. O. (1979). Predictability, attentional focus, sex-role orientation, and menstrual related distress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 41, 383–391.Google Scholar
  9. Chrisler, J. C. (1988). Age, gender-role orientation, and attitudes toward menstruation. Psychological Reports, 63, 827–834.Google Scholar
  10. Clifton, A. K, McGrath, D., & Wick, B. (1976). Stereotypes of women: a single category? Sex Roles, 2, 135–148.Google Scholar
  11. Good, P. R., & Smith, B. B. (1980). Menstrual distress and sex-role attributes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 4, 482–491.Google Scholar
  12. Haslam, A. (1991). Intergroup relations and frame of reference as determinants of stereotype content. Paper presented at 20th Annual Meeting of Australian Social Psychologists, Ballarat, Australia.Google Scholar
  13. Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Hogg, M. A., & Hardie, E. A. (1991). Social attraction, personal attraction, and self-categorization: A field study. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 175–180.Google Scholar
  15. Hogg, M. A., & Hardie, E. A. (1992). Prototypicality, conformity, and depersonalized attraction: A self-categorization analysis of group cohesiveness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 41–56.Google Scholar
  16. Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1987). Intergroup behavior, self-stereotyping and the salience of social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 325–340.Google Scholar
  17. Hogg, M. A., Turner, J. C., & Davidson, B. (1990). Polarized norms and social frames of reference: A test of self-categorization theory of group polarization. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 11, 77–100.Google Scholar
  18. Hong, S. M., & Hardie, E. A. (1988). The factor structure of the Menstrual Attitude Questionnaire in an Australian context. Paper presented at 14th International Congress of Psychology, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  19. Kalin, R., & Tilby, P. J. (1978). Development and validation of a sex-role ideology scale. Psychological Reports, 42, 731–738.Google Scholar
  20. Kerstner, P. L. (1986). Career traditionality, gender-role orientation, and life stress contributions to professional women's premenstrual symptomatology. Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 11A. (University Microfilms International No. 87-04, 515).Google Scholar
  21. Olasov, B., & Jackson, J. (1987). Effects of expectancies on women's reports of moods during the menstrual cycle. Psychosomatic Medicine, 49, 65–78.Google Scholar
  22. Parlee, M. B. (1974). Stereotypic beliefs about menstruation: A methodological note on the Moos Menstrual Distress Questionnaire and some new data. Psychosomatic Medicine, 36, 229–240.Google Scholar
  23. Ruble, D. N. (1977). Premenstrual symptoms: A reinterpretation. Science, 197, 291–292.Google Scholar
  24. Sharpe, K. A. (1986). Sex-role orientation and menstrual attitudes as risk factors in premenstrual syndrome. Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 07B. (University Microfilms International No. 86-15, 766).Google Scholar
  25. Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1–39.Google Scholar
  26. Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Social identity and group polarization. In J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher & M. S. Wetherell (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth A. Hardie
    • 1
  • Nancy E. McMurray
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations