Sex Roles

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 217–231 | Cite as

Exploring sex differences in expectancy, attribution, and academic achievement

  • Sumru Erkut
Article

Abstract

Two studies were carried out to explore if sex differences in expectancy and attribution of achievement are related to sex differences in academic performance. Study I investigated expectancy and attribution of achievement, operationalized as grade point index, among 176 male and 116 female college freshmen. Men were found to form higher expectations for future grades. Attributions measured through assigning percentage weights to ability, luck, effort, and difficulty as causal explanations of one's grade point index showed that men make more ability and women more effort attributions. Despite these differences in expectancy and attribution patterns, men and women were found not to differ in their performance. In Study II 120 college freshmen, half of them male, half female, filled out questionnaires before and after a midterm examination. A subsample of 49 also completed the Bem Sex Role Inventory. The results basically confirm the previous study's findings, except in Study II, men and women gave equally high weights to effort as a cause. The results also show that a feminine sex-role orientation is associated with a debilitating pattern of expectancy and attribution and lower performance, especially among women. Implications of the results for unraveling inconsistencies in the attribution literature and for a need to clarify connotations of femininity are discussed.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arkin, R. M., & Maruyama, G. M. Attribution, affect and college exam performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1979, 71, 85–93.Google Scholar
  2. Bem, S. L. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974, 42(2), 155–162.Google Scholar
  3. Bem, S. L. On the utility of alternative procedures for assessing psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1977, 45, 196–205.Google Scholar
  4. Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 28, 59–78.Google Scholar
  5. Crandall, V. C. Sex differences in expectancy of intellectual and academic reinforcement. In C. P. Smith (Ed.), Achievement-related motives in children. New York: Russell Sage, 1969.Google Scholar
  6. Elig, T. W., & Frieze, I. H. Measuring causal attributions for success and failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37, 621–634.Google Scholar
  7. Feather, N. T. Causal attributions for success and failure in relation to initial confidence and task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1969, 13, 129–144.Google Scholar
  8. Feather, N. T., & Simon, J. G. Fear of success and causal attribution for outcome. Journal of Personality, 1973, 41, 525–542.Google Scholar
  9. Frieze, I. H. Internal and external psychological barriers for women in science. In J. A. Ramaley (Ed.), Covert discrimination and women in the sciences (AAAS Symposium Series). Boulder, Col.: Westview Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  10. Frieze, I. H., Fisher, J., Hanusa, B., McHugh, M., & Valle, V. A. Attributions of success and failure as internal and external barriers to achievement in women. In J. S. Sherman & F. Denmark (Eds.), Psychology of women: Future of research. New York: Psychological Dimensions, 1978.Google Scholar
  11. Jackaway, R. Sex differences in achievement motivation, behavior, and attributions about success and failure. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Albany, 1974.Google Scholar
  12. Luginbuhl, J. E. R., Crowe, S. H., & Kahan, J. P. Causal attributions for success and failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 31, 86–93.Google Scholar
  13. McArthur, L. Z. Note on sex differences in causal attributions. Psychological Reports, 1976, 38, 29–30.Google Scholar
  14. McMahan, I. Relationship between causal attributions and expectancy of success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 28, 108–114.Google Scholar
  15. Simon, J. G., & Feather, N. T. Causal attributions for success and failure at university examinations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1973, 64, 46–56.Google Scholar
  16. Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. Ratings of self and peers on sex-role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and feminity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 32, 29–39.Google Scholar
  17. Weiner, B. A theory of motivation for some classroom experience. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1979, 71, 3–25.Google Scholar
  18. Weiner, B., Frieze, I., Kukla, A., Reed, I., Rest, S. A., & Rosenbaum, R. M. Perceiving the causes of success and failure. New York: General Learning Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sumru Erkut
    • 1
  1. 1.Wellesley College Center for Research on WomenWellesley

Personalised recommendations