Sex Roles

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 195–204 | Cite as

Sex differences in communication skills as measured by a modified relationship inventory

  • John E. Dalton
Article

Abstract

Previous studies have provided some indication that females are more empathic than males and that individuals show greater empathy when relating to persons of the same sex. Because the research has been equivocal, the present study attempted to replicate these findings for not only empathy but also three other communication skills measured by the Barrett-Lennard Relationship Inventory: congruence, regard, and unconditionality of regard. The subjects for this study were 20 male and 41 female students in an undergraduate experiential course in interpersonal relations. All students were placed in training groups, and the co-trainers for these groups completed ratings on a modified Relationship Inventory for each of their students. Reliability data on this inventory were satisfactory. Female students were given slightly higher ratings on all skills at both the beginning and end of the group experience, but none of the differences were significant. Male co-trainers rated the skills of male students higher than did female co-trainers, but a comparable same-sex effect for female students was not demonstrated. Thus, the experimental hypotheses were partially supported.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abramowitz, C. V., Abramowitz, S. I., & Weitz, L. J. Are men therapists soft on empathy? Two studies in feminine understanding. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1976, 32, 434–437.Google Scholar
  2. Barrett-Lennard, G. T. Dimensions of therapists' responses as causal factors in therapeutic change. Psychological Monographs, 1962, 76(43, Whole No. 562).Google Scholar
  3. Borke, H. Interpersonal perception of young children: Egocentrism or empathy? Developmental Psychology, 1971, 5, 263–269.Google Scholar
  4. Breisinger, G. D. Sex and empathy, reexamined. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1976, 23, 289–290.Google Scholar
  5. Campbell, R. J., Kagan, N., & Krathwohl, D. R. The development and validation of a scale to measure affective sensitivity (empathy). Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1971, 18, 407–412.Google Scholar
  6. Egan, G. Face to face: The small-group experience and interpersonal growth. Monterey, Calif.: Brooks/Cole, 1973.Google Scholar
  7. Egan, G. The skilled helper: A model for systematic helping and interpersonal relating. Monterey, Calif.: Brooks/Cole, 1975.Google Scholar
  8. Egan, G. Interpersonal living: A skills/contract approach to human relations training in groups. Monterey, Calif.: Brooks/Cole, 1976.Google Scholar
  9. Feshbach, N. D., & Roe, K. Empathy in six- and seven-year-olds. Child Development, 1968, 39, 133–145.Google Scholar
  10. Hoffman, M. L. Sex differences in empathy and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 1977, 84, 712–722.Google Scholar
  11. Hogan, R. Development of an empathy scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1969, 33, 307–316.Google Scholar
  12. Lin, T. Counseling relationship as a function of counselor's self-confidence. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1973, 20, 293–297.Google Scholar
  13. Olesker, W., & Balter, L. Sex and empathy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1972, 19, 559–562.Google Scholar
  14. Petro, C. S., & Hansen, J. C. Counselor sex and empathic judgment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1977, 24, 373–376.Google Scholar
  15. Stotland, E. Exploratory investigations of empathy. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 4). New York: Academic Press, 1969.Google Scholar
  16. Wiebe, B., & Pearce, W. B. An item-analysis and revision of the Barrett-Lennard Relationship Inventory. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1973, 29, 495–497.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • John E. Dalton
    • 1
  1. 1.Loyola University of ChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations