Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 29, Issue 5–6, pp 371–385 | Cite as

College men's and women's reactions to hypothetical sexual touch varied by initiator gender and coercion level

  • Cindy Struckman-Johnson
  • David Struckman-Johnson
Article

Abstract

A sample of 152 men and 152 women (mostly Caucasian) rated their reactions to a vignette in which the subjects were to imagine receiving an uninvited genital touch from a college acquaintance. The vignette was varied so that the acquaintance was of the opposite or the same gender as the subject, and the touch was either gentle or forceful. Results indicated that women anticipated strong negative effects from receiving opposite- or same-gender touch, whether gentle or forceful. Men anticipated almost no negative effects from either a gentle or forceful touch from a female acquaintance, but expected strong negative effects from a gentle or forceful touch from a male acquaintance. Regression analyses revealed that women's reactions to opposite-gender touch were mediated by beliefs in a male norm promoting casual sex, and feelings of violation and fear of harm. Men's reactions to opposite-gender touch were influenced by feelings related to sexual arousal. Men and women's reactions to same-gender touch were related to feelings of violation and harm.

Keywords

Regression Analysis Social Psychology Sexual Arousal Male Norm Strong Negative Effect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Christopher, F. S. (1988). An initial investigation into a continuum of premarital sexual pressure. The Journal of Sex Research, 25, 255–266.Google Scholar
  2. Garcia, L., Milano, L., & Quijano, A. (1989). Perceptions of coercive sexual behavior by males and females. Sex Roles, 21, 569–577.Google Scholar
  3. Goodchilds, J. D., Zellman, G. L., Johnson, P. B., & Giarrusso, R. (1988). Adolescents and their perceptions of sexual interactions. In A. Burgess (Ed.), Rape and sexual assault II. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  4. Goyer, P. F., & Eddelman, H. D. (1984). Same-sex rape of nonincarcerated men. American Journal of Psychiatry, 141, 576–579.Google Scholar
  5. Johnson, R. L., & Shrier, D. (1987). Past sexual victimization by females of male patients in an adolescent medicine clinic population. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 650–652.Google Scholar
  6. Kanin, E. J., & Parcell, S. R. (1977). Sexual aggression: A second look at the offended female. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 6, 67–76.Google Scholar
  7. Koss, M. P., Gidycz, C. A., & Wisniewski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of students in higher education. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162–170.Google Scholar
  8. Larsen, K. S., Reed, M., & Hoffman, S. (1980). Attitudes of heterosexuals toward homosexuality: A Likert-type scale and construct validity. Journal of Sex Research, 16, 245–257.Google Scholar
  9. Lottes, I. I. (1991). The relationship between nontraditional gender roles and sexual coercion. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 4, 89–109.Google Scholar
  10. Margolin, L. (1990). Gender and the stolen kiss: The social support of male and female to violate a partner's sexual consent in a noncoercive situation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 19, 281–291.Google Scholar
  11. Mezey, G., & King, M. (1989). The effects of sexual assault on men: A survey of 22 victims. Psychological Medicine, 19, 205–209.Google Scholar
  12. Muehlenhard, C. L., & Cook, S. W. (1988). Men's self-reports of unwanted sexual activity. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 58–72.Google Scholar
  13. Muehlenhard, C. L., & Long, P. L. (1988, November). Men's and women's experiences of coercive sexual intercourse: How are they pressured and how do they react? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sex, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  14. Muehlenhard, C. L., & Quackenbush, D. M. (1988, November). Can the sexual double standard put women at risk for sexually transmitted disease? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sex, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  15. Musialowski, D. M., & Kelly, K. (1987, April). Male rape: Perception of the act and the victim. Paper presented at the Eastern Regional Meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sex, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  16. Nelson, M. C. (1988). Reliability, validity, and cross-cultural comparisons for the simplified Attitudes Toward Women Scale. Sex Roles, 18, 289–296.Google Scholar
  17. Poppen, P. J., & Segal, N. J. (1988). The influence of sex and sex role orientation on sexual coercion. Sex Roles, 19, 689–701.Google Scholar
  18. Sarrel, P. M., & Masters, W. H. (1982). Sexual molestation of men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 11, 117–131.Google Scholar
  19. Smith, R. E., Pine, C. J., & Hawley, M. E. (1988). Social cognitions about adult male victims of female sexual assault. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 101–112.Google Scholar
  20. Struckman-Johnson, C. J. (1988). Forced sex on dates: It happens to men, too. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 234–240.Google Scholar
  21. Struckman-Johnson, C. J., & Struckman-Johnson, D. L. (in press). Pressured and forced sexual experiences among a sample of college men. Archives of Sexual Behavior.Google Scholar
  22. Struckman-Johnson, C. J., & Struckman-Johnson, D. L. (1992). Acceptance of male rape myths among college men and women. Sex Roles, 27, 85–100.Google Scholar
  23. Struckman-Johnson, D. L., & Struckman-Johnson, C. J. (1991). Men and women's acceptance of coercive sexual strategies varied by initiator gender and couple intimacy. Sex Roles, 25, 661–676.Google Scholar
  24. Waterman, C. K., Dawson, L. J., & Bologna, M. J. (1989). Sexual coercion in gay male and lesbian relationships: Predictors and implications for support services. Journal of Sex Research, 26, 118–124.Google Scholar
  25. Whitley, B. E. (1988). Sex differences in heterosexuals' attitudes toward homosexuals: It depends upon what you ask. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 287–291.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cindy Struckman-Johnson
    • 1
  • David Struckman-Johnson
    • 1
  1. 1.University of South DakotaUSA

Personalised recommendations