Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 73, Issue 6, pp 870–877 | Cite as

Genetic evaluation of traits distributed as Poisson-binomial with reference to reproductive characters

  • J. L. Foulley
  • D. Gianola
  • S. Im
Originals

Summary

A procedure of genetic evaluation of reproductive traits such as litter size and survival in a polytocous species under the assumption of polygenic inheritance is described. Conditional distributions of these traits are assumed to be Poisson and Bernoulli, respectively. Using the concept of generalized linear models, logarithmic (litter size) and probit (survival) functions are described as linear combinations of “nuisance” environmental effects and of transmitting abilities of sires or individual breeding values. The liability of survival is expressed conditionally to the logarithm of litter size. Inferences on location parameters are based on the mode of their joint posterior density assuming a prior multivariate normal distribution. A method of estimation of the dispersion parameters is also presented. The use of a “truncated” Poisson distribution is suggested to account for missing records on litter size.

Key words

Genetic evaluation Reproductive traits Bayesian methods Poisson distribution Threshold characters 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Box GEP, Tiao GC (1973) Bayesian inference in statistical analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading, 585 ppGoogle Scholar
  2. Bulmer MG (1980) The mathematical theory of quantitative genetics. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 255 ppGoogle Scholar
  3. Fernando RL, Gianola D (1986) Optimal properties of the conditional mean as a selection criterion. Theor Appl Genet 72:822–825Google Scholar
  4. Foulley JL, Gianola D, Thompson R (1983) Prediction of genetic merit from data on categorical and quantitative variates with an application to calving difficulty, birth weight and pelvic opening. Genet Sel Evol 25:407–424Google Scholar
  5. Foulley JL, Gianola D (1984) Estimation of genetic merit from bivariate “all-or-none” responses. Genet Sel Evol 16:285–306Google Scholar
  6. Foulley JL, Gianola D (1986) Sire evaluation for multiple binary responses when information is missing on some traits. J Dairy Sci 69:2681–2695Google Scholar
  7. Foulley JL, Im S, Gianola D, Hoschele Ina (1987) Empirical Bayes estimators of parameters for n polygenic binary traits. Genet Sel Evol (in press)Google Scholar
  8. Gianola D, Foulley JL (1983) Sire evaluation for ordered categorical data with a threshold model. Genet Sel Evol 15:201–223Google Scholar
  9. Gianola D, Foulley JL, Fernando RL (1986) Prediction of breeding values when variances are not known. Genet Sel Evol 18:485–498Google Scholar
  10. Gilmour AR, Anderson RD, Rae AL (1985) The analysis of binomial data by a generalized linear mixed model. Biometrika72:593–599Google Scholar
  11. Goffinet B (1983) Selection on selected records. Genet Sel Evol 15:91–98Google Scholar
  12. Goffinet B, Elsen JM (1984) Critère optimal de selection: quelques resultats generaux. Genet Sel Evol 16:307–318Google Scholar
  13. Harville DA, Mee RW (1984) A mixed model procedure for analyzing ordered categorical data. Biometrics 40:393–408Google Scholar
  14. Henderson CR, Quaas RL (1976) Multiple trait evaluation using relatives' records. J Anim Sci 43:1188–1197Google Scholar
  15. Hoschele I, Foulley JL, Colleau JJ, Gianola D (1986) Genetic evaluation for multiple binary responses. Genet Sel Evol 18:299–319Google Scholar
  16. Im S (1982) Contribution a l'etude des tables de contingence a parametres aleatoires: utilisation en biometrie. Thése, 3eme cycle, Université Paul Sabatier, ToulouseGoogle Scholar
  17. Kachman SD (1985) Prediction of genetic merit for growth curve parameters in outbred ICR mice. MSc Thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana, 99 ppGoogle Scholar
  18. Laird NM (1978) Empirical Bayes methods for two-way contingency tables. Biometrika 65:581–590Google Scholar
  19. McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1983) Generalized linear models. Chapman and Hall, London, 263 ppGoogle Scholar
  20. Willham RL (1963) The covariance between relatives for characters composed of components contributed by related individuals. Biometrics 19:18–27Google Scholar
  21. Wright S (1934) An analysis of variability in number of digits in an inbred strain of Guinea pigs. Genetics 19:506–536Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. L. Foulley
    • 1
  • D. Gianola
    • 1
  • S. Im
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Animal SciencesUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations