Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 73, Issue 6, pp 799–808 | Cite as

Mating system and multilocus associations in a natural population of Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco

  • F. C. Yeh
  • K. Morgan
Originals

Summary

Arrays of open-pollinated seeds were assayed for allozyme polymorphisms at ten loci (Aat2, Est1, G6pd, Idh, Mdh2, Mdh3, Pgm, Sod, 6Pgd1, 6Pgd2) to obtain estimates of the outcrossing rate and assess multilocus association in a natural population of coastal Douglas-fir, Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco. The allele frequencies in the samples of adult trees and pollen-gamete pool were similar. Maximum-likelihood estimators of the outcrossing rate for individual loci and two multilocus models were derived using counting methods. The single-locus maximum likelihood estimates (MLEs) of the outcrossing rate were significantly heterogeneous; they varied over a more than two-fold range from 0.404 to 0.935, with an average MLE of 0.741. Both multilocus MLEs of the outcrossing rate were 0.887. The sample of trees was in random mating equilibrium when assessed on a pairwise-locus basis using Burrows' composite measure of gametic disequilibrium, with one exception (Mdh2 Sod) that was attributable to a rare “gametic” class. In the sample of pollen gametes, 5 of the 45 pairwise-locus associations were nominally significant at the 0.05 level: Idh Est1, Mdh2 Sod, Aat2 Est1, Aat2 Mdh3, and Est1 Mdh3. These apparent associations were attributable in most cases to the relative excess of uncommon or rare paternal gametes of discernibly outcrossed embryos. An additional two-locus association was identified for Mdh2 Pgm which was marginally significant for the major partition of the contingency table that excluded paternal gametes with the rare allele Mdh22.

Key words

Douglas-fir Mixed mating model Outcrossing rate Gametic disequilibrium Counting method 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams WT, Joly RJ (1980) Genetics of allozyme variants in loblolly pine. J Hered 71:33–40Google Scholar
  2. Allard RW, Babbel GR, Clegg MT, Kahler AL (1972) Evidence for coadaptation in Avena barbota. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 69:3043–3048Google Scholar
  3. Bishop YMM, Fienberg SE, Holland PW (1975) Discrete multivariate analysis: theory and practice. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown AHD, Allard RW (1970) Estimation of the mating system in open-pollinated maize population using isozyme polymorphisms. Genetics 66:133–145Google Scholar
  5. Brown AHD, Matheson AC, Eldridge KG (1975) Estimation of the mating system of Eucalyptus obliqua L'Herit. by using allozyme polymorphisms. Aust J Bot 23:931–949Google Scholar
  6. Brown AHD, Barret SCH, Moran GF (1985) Mating system estimation in forest trees: models, methods and meaning. In: Gregorius H-R (ed) Population genetics in forestry. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  7. Cavalli-Sforza LL, Bodmer WF (1971) The genetics of human populations. Freeman, San Francisco, CalifGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheliak WM, Morgan K, Strobeck C, Yeh FCH, Dancik BP (1983) Estimation of mating system parameters in plant populations using the EM algorithm. Theor Appl Genet 65:157–161Google Scholar
  9. Cheliak WM, Morgan K, Dancik BP, Strobeck C, Yeh FCH (1984) Segregation of allozymes in megagametophytes of viable seed from a natural population of jack pine, Pinus banksiana Lamb. Theor Appl Genet 69:145–151Google Scholar
  10. Clegg MT, Allard RW, Kahler AL (1972) is the gene the unit of selection? Evidence from two experimental plant populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 69:2474–2478Google Scholar
  11. Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB (1977) Maximum-likelihood from imcomplete data via the EM algorithm. J R Stat Soc, Ser B 39:1–38Google Scholar
  12. Eckert RT, Joly RJ, Neale DB (1981) Genetics of isozyme variants and linkage relationships among allozyme loci in 35 eastern white pine clones. Can J For Res 11:573–579Google Scholar
  13. El-Kassaby YA, Yen FCH, Sziklai O (1982 a) Inheritance of allozyme variants in coastal Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. ‘menziesii’ (Mirb.) Franco). Can J Genet Cytol 24:325–335Google Scholar
  14. El-Kassaby YA, Sziklai O, Yeh FCH (1982 b) Linkage relationships among 19 polymorphic loci in coastal Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. ‘menziesii’ (Mirb.) Franco). Can J Genet Cytol 24:101–108Google Scholar
  15. Ellstrand NC, Foster KW (1983) Impact of population structure on the apparent outcrossing rate of grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Theor Appl Genet 66:323–327Google Scholar
  16. Epperson BK, Allard RW (1984) Allozyme analysis of the mating system in lodgepole pine populations. J Hered 75:212–214Google Scholar
  17. Fienberg SE (1980) The analysis of cross-classified categorical data. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Hill WG (1975) Tests for association of gene frequencies at several loci in random mating diploid populations. Biometrics 31:881–888Google Scholar
  19. Kahler AL, Clegg MT, Allard RW (1975) Evolutionary changes in the mating system of an experimental population of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72:943–946Google Scholar
  20. Levene H (1949) On a matching problem arising in genetics. Ann Math Stat 20:91–94Google Scholar
  21. Linhart YB, Mitton JB, Sturgeon KB, Davis ML (1981) Genetic variation in space and time in a population of ponderosa pine. Heredity 46:407–426Google Scholar
  22. Lundkvist K (1974) Inheritance of leucine aminopeptidase isozymes in Picea abies K. Hereditas 76:91–96Google Scholar
  23. Mitton JB, Linhart YB, Hamrick JL, Beckman JS (1977) Observations on the genetic structure and mating system of ponderosa pine in the Colorado front range. Theor Appl Genet 51:5–13Google Scholar
  24. Mitton JB, Linhart YB, Davis ML, Sturgeon KB (1981) Estimation of outcrossing in ponderosa pine, Pinus ponderosa Laws from patterns of segregation of protein polymorphisms and from frequencies of albino seedlings. Silvae Genet 30:117–121Google Scholar
  25. Moran GF, Bell JC, Matheson AC (1980) The genetic structure and levels of inbreeding in a Pinus radiata D. Don seed orchard. Silvae Genet 29:190–193Google Scholar
  26. Moran GF, Brown AHD (1980) Temporal heterogeneity of outcrossing rates in Alpine ash (Eucalyptus delegatensis R.T. Bak.). Theor Appl Genet 57:101–105Google Scholar
  27. Morris RW, Spieth PT (1978) Sampling strategies for using female gametophytes to estimate heterozygosity in conifers. Theor Appl Genet 51:217–222Google Scholar
  28. Nei M, Li WH (1973) Linkage disequilibrium in subdivided populations. Genetics 75:213–219Google Scholar
  29. O'Malley DM, Allendorf FW, Blake GM (1979) Inheritance isozyme variation and heterozygosity in Pinus ponderosa. Biochem Genet 17:233–250Google Scholar
  30. Phillips MA, Brown AHD (1977) Mating system and hybridity in Eucalyptus pauciflora. Aust J Biol Sci 30:337–344Google Scholar
  31. Ritland K, Jain S (1981) A model for the estimation of outcrossing rate and gene frequencies using n independent loci. Heredity 47:35–52Google Scholar
  32. Ritland K, El-Kassaby YA (1985) The nature of inbreeding in a seed orchard of Douglas-fir as shown by an efficient multilocus model. Theor Appl Genet 71:375–384Google Scholar
  33. Rao CR (1973) Linear statistical inference and its applications. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Roberds JH, Brotschol JV (1985) Linkage disequilibria among allozyme loci in natural populations of Liriodendron tulipifera L. Silvae Genet 34:137–141Google Scholar
  35. Roberds JH, Conkle MT (1984) Genetic structure in loblolly pine stands: allozyme variation in parents and progeny. For Sci 30:319–329Google Scholar
  36. Rudin D (1977) Leucine-amino-peptidase (LAP) from needles and macrogametophytes of Pinus sylvestris L. Inheritance of allozymes. Hereditas 85:219–226Google Scholar
  37. Schmidt RL (1960) Factors controlling the distribution of Douglas-fir in coastal British Columbia. Q J For 54:156–160Google Scholar
  38. Schoen DJ, Clegg MT (1986) Monte Carlo studies of plant mating system estimation models: the one-pollen parent and mixed mating models. Genetics 112:927–945Google Scholar
  39. Shaw DV, Kahler AL, Allard RW (1981) A multilocus estimator of mating system parameters in plant populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:1298–1302Google Scholar
  40. Shaw DV, Allard RW (1982) Estimation of outcrossing rates in Douglas-fir using isozyme markers. Theor Appl Genet 62:113–120Google Scholar
  41. Smith CAB (1957) Counting methods in genetical statistics. Ann Hum Genet 21:254–276Google Scholar
  42. Smith CAB (1986) Chi-squared tests with small numbers. Ann Hum Genet 50:163–167Google Scholar
  43. Sokal RS, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2nd edn. Freeman, San Francisco, CalifGoogle Scholar
  44. Sorensen FC (1969) Embryonic genetic load in coastal Douglas-fir, Pseudotsuga menziesii var. ‘menziesii’. Am Nat 103:389–398Google Scholar
  45. Sorensen FC (1982) The roles of polyembryony and embryo viability in genetic system of conifers. Evolution 36:725–733Google Scholar
  46. Strauss SH, Conkle MT (1986) Segregation, linkage, and diversity of allozymes in knobcone pine. Theor Appl Genet 72:483–493Google Scholar
  47. Weir BS (1979) Inferences about linkage disequilibrium. Biometrics 35:235–254Google Scholar
  48. Yeh FC, Layton C (1979) The organization of genetic variability in central and marginal populations of lodgepole pine Pinus contorta spp. latifolia. Can J Genet Cytol 21:487–503Google Scholar
  49. Yeh FC, O'Malley DM (1980) Enzyme variation in natural populations of Douglas-fir, Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco from British Columbia. 1. Genetic variation patterns in coastal populations. Silvae Genet 29:83–92Google Scholar
  50. Yeh FC, Brune A, Cheliak WM, Chipman DC (1983) Mating system of Eucalyptus citriodora in a seed-production area. Can J For Res 13:1051–1055Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. C. Yeh
    • 1
  • K. Morgan
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Forest ScienceUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  2. 2.Department of GeneticsUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  3. 3.Department of Epidemiology and BiostatisticsMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations