Abstract
Inconsistencies in research concerning the relationship between fear of success (FOS) and sex-role orientation may be due to the use of sex-role inventories considering masculinity and femininity as endpoints of a bipolar continuum. The Bem Sex-Role Inventory (BSRI; Bem, 1974), which treats masculinity and femininity as separate dimensions, was administered to 218 female undergraduates in addition to measures of FOS, achievement motivation, and performance. It was predicted that women who were androgynous (high feminine and high masculine) would evidence less FOS than women who were high masculine or high feminine. It was also predicted that women who embraced masculine characteristics (androgynous or sex-reversed) would be higher in both achievement motivation and performance than low masculine women. Both predictions were confirmed. Sex-reversed women were highest in FOS.
Keywords
Endpoint Social Psychology Achievement Motivation Separate Dimension Female UndergraduatePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Bem, S. L. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974, 42, 155–162.Google Scholar
- Bem, S. L. Sex-role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 31, 634–643.Google Scholar
- Bem, S. L., & Lenny, E. Sex-typing and the avoidance of cross-sex behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 33, 48–54.Google Scholar
- Caballero, C. M., Giles, P., & Shaver, P. Sex-role traditionalism and fear of success. Sex Roles, 1975, 1, 319–326.Google Scholar
- Depner, C., & O'Leary, V. Understanding female careerism: Fear of success and new directions. Sex Roles, 1976, 2, 259–268.Google Scholar
- Horner, M. S. Femininity and successful achievement: A basic inconsistency. In J. Bardwick, E. Douvan, M. Horner, & D. Gutman (Eds.), Feminine personality and conflict. Belmont, Calif.: Brooks-Cole, 1970.Google Scholar
- Horner, M. S. The motive to avoid success and changing aspirations of college women. In J. M. Bardwick (Ed.), Readings on the Psychology of Women. New York: Harper & Row, 1972.Google Scholar
- Jackson, D. N. Manual for the Personality Research Form. London, Canada: University of Western Ontario Press, 1967.Google Scholar
- Makosky, V. P. Sex-role compatibility of task and of competitor, and fear of success as variables affecting women's performance. Sex Roles, 1976, 2, 237–248.Google Scholar
- O'Leary, V. E., & Hammack, B. Sex-role orientation and achievement context as determinants of the motive to avoid success. Sex-Roles, 1975, 1, 225–234.Google Scholar
- Peplau, L. A. Impact of fear of success and sex-role attitudes on women's competitive achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 34, 561–568.Google Scholar
- Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. Ratings of self and peers on sex-role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and feminity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 32, 29–39.Google Scholar
- Tresemer, D. W. Research on fear of success: Full annotated bibliography. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 1976, 6, 38–39. (Ms. No. 1237)Google Scholar
- Zuckerman, M., & Wheeler, L. To dispel fantasies about the fantasy-based measure of fear of success. Psychological Bulletin, 1975, 82, 932–946.Google Scholar