Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 29, Issue 7–8, pp 477–495 | Cite as

Photographic depictions of the self: Gender and age differences in social connectedness

  • Stephanie M. Clancy
  • Stephen J. Dollinger
Article

Abstract

With primarily (88%) Caucasian participants, the autophotography method [R. C. Ziller (1990), Photographing the Self, Newbury Park, California: Sage] was used to test for gender differences in social connectedness as hypothesized by a number of scholars [e.g., M. F. Belenky, B. M. Clinchy, N. R. Goldberger, and J. M. Tarule (1986), Women's Ways of Knowing, New York: Basic Books; N. Chodorow (1978), The Reproduction of Mothering, Berkeley: University of California Press; C. Gilligan (1982), In a Different Voice, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press; J. V. Jordan (1991), “The Relational Self: A New Perspective for Understanding Women's Development,” in J. Strauss and G. R. Goethals (Eds.), The Self: Interdisciplinary Approaches, New York: Springer-Verlag; N. P. Lyons (1983), “Two Perspectives: On Self, Relationships, and Mortality,” Harvard Educational Review, Vol. 53, pp. 125–145]. Relative to men (N=59), women (N=142) included more pictures of self-with-others, people smiling, people touching, groups of people, and family in their autophotographic essays. Relative to women, men had more photos of the self-alone and more photos involving physical activity and motor vehicles. Age trends suggested (a) increasing connectedness among women but not among men, and (b) greater transcendence of temporal and material concerns for both genders. When taken together with past findings employing more verbal methods, the results provide compelling evidence that women define themselves in more socially connected terms whereas men's self-definitions emphasize the quality of separateness.

Keywords

Physical Activity Social Psychology Motor Vehicle Compelling Evidence Interdisciplinary Approach 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aron, A., Aron, E., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of the other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashmore, R. D. (1990). Sex, gender, and the individual. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality theory and research. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  3. Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  4. Baran, S. J., & Blasko, V. J. (1984). Social perceptions and the by-products of advertising. Journal of Communication, 34, 12–20.Google Scholar
  5. Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women's ways of knowing. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  6. Blais, M. R., Vallerand, R. J., Briere, N. M., Gagnon, A., & Pelletier, L. G. (1990). Significance, structure, and gender differences in life domains of college students, Sex Roles, 22, 199–222.Google Scholar
  7. Block, J. H. (1984). Sex role identity and ego development. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  8. Brennan-Parks, K., Goddard, M., Wilson, A. E., & Kinnear, L. (1991). Sex differences in smiling as measured in a picture taking task. Sex Roles, 24, 375–382.Google Scholar
  9. Budd, B. E., Clance, P. R., & Simerly, D. E. (1985). Spatial configurations: Erikson reexamined. Sex Roles, 12, 571–577.Google Scholar
  10. Buhler, C. (1935). The curve of life as studied in biographies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 19, 405–409.Google Scholar
  11. Caldwell, M. A., & Peplau, L. A. (1982). Sex differences in same-sex friendship. Sex Roles, 8, 721–732.Google Scholar
  12. Caplan, P. J. (1979). Erikson's concept of inner space: A data-based reevaluation. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 49, 100–108.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Carlson, R. (1971). Sex differences in ego functioning: Exploratory studies of agency and communion. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 37, 267–277.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Chodorow, N. (1974). Family structure and feminine personality. In M. Z. Rosaldo & L. Lamphere (Eds.), Women, culture and society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Chodorow, N. (1978). The reproduction of mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  16. Cramer, P., & Hogan, K. A. (1975). Sex differences in verbal and play fantasy. Developmental Psychology, 11, 145–154.Google Scholar
  17. Deutsch, F. M. (1990). Status, sex, and smiling: The effect of role on smiling in men and women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 531–540.Google Scholar
  18. Dinklage, R. I., & Ziller, R. C. (1989). Explicating cognitive conflict through photocommunication. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 33, 309–317.Google Scholar
  19. Dollinger, S. J., & Clancy, S. M. (1993). Identity, self, and personality. II: Glimpses through the autophotographic eye. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 1064–1071.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Erikson, E. H. (1951). Sex differences in the play configurations of preadolescents. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 21, 667–692.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Womanhood and the inner space. In Identity, youth, and crisis. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  22. Erikson, E. H. (1974). Womanhood and the inner space. In J. Strouse (Ed.), Women and analysis. New York: Grossman.Google Scholar
  23. Franz, C. E., & White, K. M. (1985). Individuation and attachment in personality development: Extending Erikson's theory. Journal of Personality, 53, 224–256.Google Scholar
  24. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Gutmann, D. (1965). Women and the conception of ego strength. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 11, 229–240.Google Scholar
  26. Halberstadt, A. G., & Saitta, M. B. (1987). Gender, nonverbal behavior, and perceived dominance: A test of the theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 257–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Halberstadt, A. G., Hayes, C. W., & Pike, K. M. (1988). Gender and gender role differences in smiling and communication consistency. Sex Roles, 19, 589–604.Google Scholar
  28. Hall, J. A. (1978). Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 845–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hall, J. A. (1987). On explaining gender differences: The case of nonverbal communication. In P. Shaver & C. Hendrick (Eds.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 7). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Henry, W. P., & Solano, C. H. (1983). Photographic style and personality: Developing a coding system for photographs. Journal of Psychology, 115, 79–87.Google Scholar
  31. Hoffman, M. L. (1977). Sex differences in empathy and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 712–722.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hyde, J. S., & Phillis, D. E. (1979). Androgyny across the life span. Developmental Psychology, 15, 334–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hyde, J. S., Krajnik, M., & Skuldt-Niederberger, K. (1991). Androgyny across the life span: A replication and longitudinal follow-up. Developmental Psychology, 27, 516–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. James, W. (1968). The self. In C. Gordon & K. Gergen (Eds.), The self in social interaction. New York: John Wiley & Sons (Original work published 1890).Google Scholar
  35. Jordan, J. V. (1991). The relational self: A new perspective for understanding women's development. In J. Strauss & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), The self: Interdisciplinary approaches. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  36. Josselson, R. L. (1988). Finding herself: Pathways of identity development in women. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  37. Jung, C. G. (1933). Psychological types. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.Google Scholar
  38. Lyons, N. P. (1983). Two perspectives: on self, relationships, and morality. Harvard Educational Review, 53, 125–145.Google Scholar
  39. Markus, H., & Cross, S. (1990). The interpersonal self. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality theory and research. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  40. McAdams, D. P., Jackson, R. J., & Kirshnit, C. (1984). Looking, laughing, and smiling in dyads as a function of intimacy motivation and reciprocity. Journal of Personality, 52, 261–273.Google Scholar
  41. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1985). Openness to experience. In R. Hogan & W. H. Jones (Eds.), Perspectives on personality (Vol. 1). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  42. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1988). Age, personality, and the spontaneous self-concept. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 43, S177-S185.Google Scholar
  43. McGuire, W., & McGuire, C. (1982). Significant others in self-space: Sex differences and developmental trends in the social self. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  44. McKay, J., Pyke, S. W., & Goranson, R. (1984). Whatever happened to “inner-space”?: A failure to replicate. International Journal of Women's Studies, 7, 387–396.Google Scholar
  45. Miller, J. B. (1984). The development of women's sense of self. Work in Progress, No. 12, Stone Center Working Papers Series, Wellesley, MA.Google Scholar
  46. Mills, J. (1984). Self-posed behaviors of females and males in photographs. Sex Roles, 10, 633–637.Google Scholar
  47. Mills-Ragan, J. (1982). Gender displays in portrait photographs. Sex Roles, 8, 33–43.Google Scholar
  48. Morse, C. (1982). College yearbook pictures: More females smile than males. Journal of Psychology, 110, 3–6.Google Scholar
  49. Mosher, D. L., & Sirkin, M. (1984). Measuring a macho personality constellation. Journal of Research in Personality, 18, 150–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Neugarten, B. L. (1976). Adaptation and the life cycle. The Counseling Psychologist, 6, 16–20.Google Scholar
  51. Newman, D. J. (1973). The American courtship of house and car. Journal of Popular Culture, 17, 434–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Okura, Y., Ziller, R. C., & Osawa, H. (1985–86). The psychological niche of older Japanese and Americans through auto-photography: Aging and the search for peace. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 22, 247–259.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Patterson, S. J., Sochting, I., & Marcia, J. E. (1992). The inner space and beyond: Women and identity. In G. R. Adams, T. P. Gullotta, & R. Montemayor (Eds.), Adolescent identity formation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. Rorer, B. A., & Ziller, R. C. (1982). Iconic communication of values among American and Polish students. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 13, 352–361.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Ryff, C. D., & Heincke, S. G. (1983). Subjective organization of personality in adulthood and aging. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 807–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Spilka, B., Hood, R. W., Jr., & Gorsuch, R. L. (1985). The psychology of religion: An empirical approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  57. Stiles, D. A., Gibbons, J. L., & Schnellmann, J. (1987). The smiling sunbather and the chivalrous football player: Young adolescents' images of the ideal woman and man. Journal of Early Adolescence, 7, 411–427.Google Scholar
  58. Surrey, J. L. (1985). The “self-in-relation”: A theory of women's development. Work in progress, No. 13, Stone Center Working Papers Series, Wellesley, MA.Google Scholar
  59. Wright, P. H. (1982). Men's friendships, women's friendships and the alleged inferiority of the latter. Sex Roles, 8, 1–20.Google Scholar
  60. Wulff, D. M. (1991). The psychology of religion: Classic and contemporary views. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  61. Ziller, R. C. (1990). Photographing the self. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  62. Ziller, R. C., & Lewis, D. (1981). Orientations: Self, social, and environmental percepts through auto-photography. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 338–343.Google Scholar
  63. Ziller, R. C., & Rorer, B. A. (1985). Shyness-environment interaction: A view from the shy side through auto-photography. Journal of Personality, 53, 626–639.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Ziller, R. C., & Smith, D. E. (1977). A phenomenological utilization of photographs. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 7, 172–182.Google Scholar
  65. Ziller, R. C., Vera, H., & deSantoya, C. C. (1989). The psychological niche of children of poverty and affluence through auto-photography. Children's Environments Quarterly, 6, 186–196.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephanie M. Clancy
    • 1
  • Stephen J. Dollinger
    • 1
  1. 1.Southern Illinois UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations