Sex Roles

, Volume 23, Issue 11–12, pp 629–643 | Cite as

Generic pronouns and sexist language: The oxymoronic character of masculine generics

  • John Gastil
Article

Abstract

This experiment investigated the propensity of the generic he to evoke images of males relative to he/she and the plural they. Undergraduates read sentences aloud and verbally described the images that came to mind. The results provide strong support for the hypothesis that the generic he evokes a disproportionate number of male images. Results also suggest that while the plural they functions as a generic pronoun for both males and females, males may comprehend he/she in a manner similar to he. Theoretical implications for a critique of sexist language and prescribing generic pronoun usage are considered.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. APA Publication Manual Task Force. (1977). Guidelines for nonsexist language in APA journals: Publication Manual change sheet 2. American Psychologist, 32, 487–494.Google Scholar
  2. Bem, S., & Bem, D. (1973). Does sex-biased job advertising “aid and abet” sex discrimination? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 3, 6–18.Google Scholar
  3. Bendix, E. (1979). Linguistic model as political symbols: Gender and the generic “he” in English. In J. Orasanu, M. Slater, & L. Adler (Eds.), Language, sex and gender: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (Vol. 327). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  4. Blaubergs, M. (1980). An analysis of classic arguments against changing sexist language. In C. Kramarae (Ed.), The voice of women and men. New York: Permagon Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bodine, A. (1975). Androcentrism in prescriptive grammar: Singular “they,” sex-indefinite “he” and “he or she.” Language in Society, 4, 129–146.Google Scholar
  6. Briere, J., & Lanktree, C. (1983). Sex-role related effects of sex bias in language. Sex Roles, 9, 625–632.Google Scholar
  7. Brooks, L. (1983). Sexist language in occupational information: Does it make a difference? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 23, 227–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cole, C., Hill, F., & Dayley, L. (1983). Do masculine pronouns used generically lead to thoughts of men? Sex Roles, 9, 737–749.Google Scholar
  9. Collins, R. (1977). Language, history, and the legal process: A profile of the “reasonable man.” Camden Law Journal, 8, 312–323.Google Scholar
  10. Creech, B., & Wilson, R. (1979). Occupational stereotyping and the sexist effects of pronouns. Unpublished manuscript, North Carolina State University.Google Scholar
  11. Dillard, J. (1989). Unpublished raw data. University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  12. Faggen-Steckler, J., McCarthy, K., & Tittle, C. (1974). A quantitative method for measuring sex “bias” in standardized tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 11, 151–161.Google Scholar
  13. Goldsmith, A. (1980). Notes on the tyranny of language usage. In C. Kramarae (Ed.), The voices of women and men. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  14. Graham, A. (1973). The making of a nonsexist dictionary. In B. Thorne & N. Henley (Eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
  15. Harrison, L. (1975). Cro-magnon woman—In eclipse. Science Teacher, 42, 8–11.Google Scholar
  16. Heilbrun, A. (1981). Human sex-role behavior. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hill, A. (1986). Mother tongue, father time. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kidd, V. (1971). A study of the images produced through the use of male pronouns as the generic. Moments in Contemporary Rhetoric and Communications, 1, 25–30.Google Scholar
  19. Kramarae, C. (1981). Women and men speaking. Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. MacKay, D. (1980a). On the goals, principles, and procedures for prescriptive grammar. Language and society, 9, 349–367.Google Scholar
  21. MacKay, D. (1980b). Psychology, prescriptive grammar, and the pronoun problem. American Psychologist, 35, 444–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. MacKay, D. (1983). Prescriptive grammar and the pronoun problem. In B. Thorne, C. Kramarae, & N. Henley (Eds.), Language, gender and society. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
  23. MacKay, D., & Fulkerson, D. (1979). On the comprehension and production of pronouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 661–673.Google Scholar
  24. Martyna, W. (1978). What does “he” mean? Use of the generic masculine. Journal of Communication, 28, 131–138.Google Scholar
  25. Martyna, W. (1983). Beyond the “he/man” approach: The case for nonsexist language. In B. Thorne, C. Kramarae, & N. Henley (Eds.), Language, gender, and society. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
  26. Moulton, J., Robinson, G., & Cherin, E. (1978). Psychology in action: Sex bias in language use: “Neutral” pronouns that aren't. American Psychologist, 33, 1032–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nilsen, A. (1977). Sexism in children's books and elementary teaching materials. In A. Nilsen, H. Bosmajian, H. Gershuny, & J. Stanley (Eds.), Sexism and language. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
  28. Pincus, A., & Pincus, R. (1980). Linguistic sexism and career education. Language Arts, 57, 70–76.Google Scholar
  29. Ritchie, M. (1975). Alice through the statues. McGill Law Journal, 21.Google Scholar
  30. Schneider, J., & Hacker, S. (1973). Sex-role imagery and use of the generic “man” in introductory texts: A case in the sociology of sociology. The American Sociologist, 8, 12–18.Google Scholar
  31. Sheplack, N., Ogden, D., & Tobin-Bennett, D. (1976). Students' perceptions of career as a function of gender cues. Unpublished paper, Indiana University.Google Scholar
  32. Silveira, J. (1980). Generic masculine words and thinking. In C. Kramarae (Ed.), The voice of women and men. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  33. Sniezek, J., & Jazwinski, C. (1986). Gender bias in English: In search of fair language. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16(7), 642–662.Google Scholar
  34. Soto, D. (1976, November). Alternatives to using masculine pronouns when referring to the species. Paper presented at the 46th annual meeting of the Western Speech Communication Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  35. Stericker, A. (1981). Does this “he or she” business really make a difference? The effect of masculine pronouns as generics on job attitudes. Sex Roles, 7, 637–641.Google Scholar
  36. Strunk, W., & White, E. B. (1979). The elements of style. New York: MacMillan Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  37. Switzer, J. Y. (1990). The impact of generic word choices: an empirical investigation of age- and sex-related differences. Sex Roles, 22, 69–82.Google Scholar
  38. Whorf, B. (1956). Language, thought, and reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  39. Todd-Mancillas, W. (1981). Masculine generics = sexist language. Communication Quarterly, 29(2), 107–115.Google Scholar
  40. Todd-Mancillas, W., & Meyers, K. (1980, May). The effects of inclusive/exclusive language on reading comprehension, perceived human interest, and likelihood of inclusive pronoun usage. Paper presented at the 30th annual International Communication Association, Acapulco, Mexico.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Gastil
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Wisconsin—MadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations