Sex Roles

, Volume 29, Issue 9–10, pp 645–669

Nontraditional gender roles and the sexual experiences of heterosexual college students

  • Ilsa L. Lottes
Article

Abstract

The purposes of this study of heterosexual college students were (1) to specify gender differences and similarities in sexual beliefs and experiences, (2) to determine the prevalence of women enacting traditional male roles in dating and sexual interactions, and (3) to examine the relationship between women's enactment of traditional male roles and their sexual experiences. Findings for this predominantly Caucasian sample indicated that there were no significant gender differences in age of first intercourse, frequency of intercourse, oral sex participation, prevalence of coitus and anal sex, rating of how often sex partners satisfied their sex needs and desires, and reactions to recent intercourse. Although less than men's frequencies, sizable proportions of women acknowledged they had multiple sex partners and sex without emotional involvement. Support for an increased proportion of females engaging in the traditional male roles of initiating sexual involvement and dates and paying date expenses was also found. Findings also suggested that there are no simple patterns between women's sexual experience and nontraditional roles but that this association depends on the specific role as well as the status and quality of a woman's current sexual relationship. Findings were discussed in terms of their potential to contribute to women's sexual decisions.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbey, A. (1982). Sex differences in attributions for friendly behavior: Do males misperceive females' friendliness? Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 830–839.Google Scholar
  2. Abbey, A. (1987). Misperceptions of friendly behaviors as sexual interest: A survey of naturally occurring events. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 173–194.Google Scholar
  3. Abbey, A., & Melby, C. (1986). The effects of nonverbal cues on gender differences in perceptions of sexual intent. Sex Roles, 15, 283–298.Google Scholar
  4. Atwood, J. D., & Gagnon, J. (1982). Masturbatory behavior in college youth. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 13, 35–42.Google Scholar
  5. Bell, R. R., & Coughey, K. (1980). Premarital sexual experience among college females. Family Relations, 29, 353–357.Google Scholar
  6. Bishop, P. D., & Lipsitz, A. (1990). Sexual behavior among college students in the AIDS era: A comparative study. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 3, 35–52.Google Scholar
  7. Blumberg, R. L. (1984). A general theory of gender stratification. Sociological Theory, 2, 23–101.Google Scholar
  8. Carroll, J. L., Volk, K. D., & Hyde, J. S. (1985). Differences between males and females in motives for engaging in sexual intercourse. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14, 131–139.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark, R. D., & Hatfield, E. (1989). Gender differences in receptivity to sexual offers. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 2, 39–55.Google Scholar
  10. Collins, R. (1971). A conflict theory of sexual stratification. Social Problems, 19, 3–21.Google Scholar
  11. Darling, C. A., & Davidson, J. K., Sr. (1987). Guilt: A factor in sexual satisfaction. Sociological Inquiry, 57, 251–271.Google Scholar
  12. DeLamater, J. (1987). Gender differences in sexual scenarios. In K. Kelly (Ed.), Females, males, and sexuality. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  13. DeLamater, J., & MacCorquodale, P. (1979). Premarital sexuality, attitudes relationships, behavior. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  14. Earle, J. R., & Perricone, P. (1986). Premarital sexuality: A ten-year study of attitudes and behavior on a small university campus. The Journal of Sex Research, 22, 304–310.Google Scholar
  15. Ehrenreich, B., Hess, E., & Jacobs, G. (1987). Remaking love the feminization of sex. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press.Google Scholar
  16. Grauerholz, E., & Serpe, R. T. (1985). Initiation and response: The dynamics of sexual interaction. Sex Roles, 12, 1041–1059.Google Scholar
  17. Griffitt, W. (1987). Females, males, and sexual responses. In K. Kelly (Ed.), Females, males, and sexuality. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hendrick, S., Hendrick, C., Slapion-Foote, M., & Foot, F. (1985). Gender differences in sexual attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1630–1642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Henley, N., & Freeman, J. (1984). The sexual politics of interpersonal behavior. In J. Freeman (Ed.), Women: A feminist perspective. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.Google Scholar
  20. Hopkins, J. R. (1977). Sexual behavior in adolescence. Journal of Social Issues, 33, 67–85.Google Scholar
  21. Keller, J. F., Elliott, S. S., & Gunberg, E. (1982). Premarital sexual intercourse among single college students: A discriminant analysis. Sex Roles, 8, 21–32.Google Scholar
  22. King, K., Balswick, J. C., & Robinson, I. E. (1977). The continuing premarital sexual revolution among college females. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39, 455–459.Google Scholar
  23. Knox, D., & Wilson, K. (1981). Dating behaviors of university students. Family Relations, 30, 255–258.Google Scholar
  24. Korman, S. K. (1983). Nontraditional dating behavior: Date-initiation and date expense-sharing among feminists and nonfeminists. Family Relations, 32, 575–581.Google Scholar
  25. Lawson, A. (1988). Adultery. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  26. Leitenberg, H., Detzer, M. J., & Srebnik, D. (1993). Gender differences in masturbation and the relation of masturbation experience in preadolescence and/or early adolescence to sexual behavior and sexual adjustment in young adulthood. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 22, 887–898.Google Scholar
  27. Lips, H. M. (1981). Women, men and the psychology of power. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  28. Lips, H. M. (1991). Women, men and power. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.Google Scholar
  29. Lottes, I. (1985). The use of cluster analysis to determine belief patterns of sexual attitudes. The Journal of Sex Research, 21, 405–421.Google Scholar
  30. Lottes, I. (1986). Sex role socialization and rape-supportive attitudes. Paper presented at the Society for the Study of Social Problems meetings, New York.Google Scholar
  31. McCormick, N. B. (1979). Come-ons and put-offs: Unmarried students' strategies for having and avoiding sexual intercourse. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 4, 94–211.Google Scholar
  32. McCormick, N. B., & Jessor, C. J. (1983). The courtship game: Power in the sexual encounters. In E. Allgeier & N. McCormick (Eds.), Changing boundaries. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.Google Scholar
  33. McLaughlin, S., Melber, B. D., Billy, J. O., Zimmerle, D. M., Wings, L. D., & Johnson, T. R. (1988). The changing lives of American women. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  34. Mott, F. L., & Haurin, J. (1988). Linkages between sexual activity and alcohol and drug use among American adolescents. Family Planning Perspectives, 20, 128–136.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Muehlenhard, C. L., & Cook, S. W. (1988). Men's self-reports of unwanted sexual activity. The Journal of Sex Research, 24, 58–72.Google Scholar
  36. Muehlenhard, C. L., & Linton, M. A. (1987). Date rape and sexual aggression in dating situations: Incidence and risk factors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 186–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Muehlenhard, C. L., & McCoy, M. L. (1991). Double standard/double bind: The sexual double standard and women's communication about sex. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 447–461.Google Scholar
  38. Norusis, M. (1990). The SPSS guide to data analysis for release 4. Chicago: SPSS, Inc.Google Scholar
  39. Peplau, L. A., Rubin, Z., & Hill, C. T. (1977). Sexual intimacy in dating relationships. Journal of Social Issues, 33, 86–109.Google Scholar
  40. Perper, T., & Weis, D. L. (1987). Proceptive and rejective strategies of U.S. and Canadian college women. The Journal of Sex Research, 23, 455–480.Google Scholar
  41. Person, E. S. (1980). Sexuality as the mainstay of identity: Psychoanalytic perspectives. Signs, 5, 605–630.Google Scholar
  42. Phillips, A. (Ed.). (1987). Feminism and equality. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Phillis, D. E., & Gromko, M. H. (1985). Sex differences in sexual activity: Reality or illusion. The Journal of Sex Research, 21, 437–443.Google Scholar
  44. Radlove, S. (1983). Sexual response and gender roles. In E. Allgeier & N. McCormick (Eds.), Changing boundaries. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.Google Scholar
  45. Reinisch, J. M., Sanders, S. A., Hill, C. A., & Davis, M. Z. (1992). High risk sexual behavior among heterosexual undergraduates at a midwestern university. Family Planning Perspectives, 24, 116–121.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Reiss, I. L. (1967). The social context of premarital sexual permissiveness. New York: Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  47. Reiss, I. L. (1986). Journey into sexuality: An exploratory voyage. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  48. Reiss, I. L. (1990). An end to shame: Shaping our next sexual revolution. Buffalo: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  49. Robinson, I. E., & Jedlicka, D. (1982). Change in sexual attitudes and behavior of college students from 1965 to 1980: A research note. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 237–240.Google Scholar
  50. Roche, J. P. (1986). Premarital sex: Attitudes and behavior by dating stage. Adolescence, 21, 107–121.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Russell, D. (1975). The politics of rape. New York: Stein and Day.Google Scholar
  52. Safilios-Rothschild, C. (1977). Love, sex, and sex roles. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  53. Scully, D., & Bart, P. (1973). A funny thing happened on the way to the orifice: Women in gynecology textbooks. In J. Huber (Ed.), Changing women in a changing society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  54. Sherwin, R., & Corbett, S. (1985). Campus sexual norms and dating relationships. The Journal of Sex Research, 21, 258–274.Google Scholar
  55. Struckman-Johnson, C. (1988). Forced sex on dates: It happens to men too. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 234–241.Google Scholar
  56. Vance, C. S. (1984). Pleasure and danger; Toward a politics of sexuality. In C. S. Vance (Ed.), Pleasure and danger. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  57. Venereal diseases found more dangerous to women. (1993, April 1). The Sun, pp. 5, 19.Google Scholar
  58. Weis, K., & Borges, S. A. (1975). Victimology and rape: The case of the legitimate victim. In L. J. Schultz (Ed.), Rape victimology. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publishers.Google Scholar
  59. Whitley, B. E., Jr. (1988). The relation of gender-role orientation to sexual experience among college students. Sex Roles, 19, 619–637.Google Scholar
  60. Wilson, S. M., & Medora, N. P. (1990). Gender comparisons of college students' attitudes toward sexual behavior. Adolescence, 24, 615–627.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ilsa L. Lottes
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Sociology and AnthropologyUniversity of Maryland Baltimore CountyBaltimore

Personalised recommendations