Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 73, Issue 4, pp 496–500 | Cite as

Repressing the expression of self-incompatibility in crucifers by short-term high temperature treatment

  • K. Okazaki
  • K. Hinata
Article

Summary

The effect of short-term high temperature on the expression of self-incompatibility was studied in detached flowers of Brassica oleracea, B. campestris and Raphanus sativus. The expression of self-incompatibility was repressed by treatment of pistils at 40 °C for 15 minutes. Treatment at 50 °C repressed self-incompatibility but it also disturbed pollen tube elongation into stylar tissue. S-glycoproteins did not show any quantitative changes during the intact pistil treatment under 50 °C. Callose was occasionally found in the treated papilla where the self pollen tube penetrated. The repressing effect of the 40 °C treatment was found to be reversible, and this reversibility depended upon the environmental temperature of plant. Plants grown at 15/5 °C (day/night temperature) completely recovered self-incompatibility 2 h after treatment, while those grown at 20/10°, 25/15 °C did not. The reversibility of the expression of self-incompatibility correlated with the distortion of plasma membrane in the papilla. It is considered that high temperature affects the pollen tube penetration system in pistils rather than the recognition system between pistils and pollen. The treatment of dehiscing anthers at 40 °C killed the pollen.

Key words

Self-incompatibility Short-term high temperature Crucifers 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gonai H, Hinata K (1971) Effect of temperature on pistil growth and phenotypic expression of self-incompatibility in Brassica oleracea L. Jpn J Breed 21:195–198Google Scholar
  2. Hinata K, Okazaki K (1986) Role of stigma in the expression of self-incompatibility in Crucifers in view of genetic analysis. In: Mulcahy DL, Mulcahy GB, Ottaviano E (eds) Biotechnology and ecology of pollen. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 185–190Google Scholar
  3. Hinata K, Okazaki K, Nishio T (1983) Gene analysis of self-compatibility in Brassica campestris var. ‘Yellow sarson’ (A case of recessive epistatic modifier). Actes 6e Congr Int le Colza Paris 1:354–359Google Scholar
  4. Johnson AG (1972) Some causes of variations in the proportion of selfed seed present in F1-hybrid seed lot of Brussels Sprouts. Euphytica 21:309–316Google Scholar
  5. Marcucci MC, Visser T, Tuyl JM van (1982) Pollen and pollination experiments. 6. Heat resistance of pollen. Euphytica 31:287–290Google Scholar
  6. Matsubara S (1980) Overcoming self-incompatibility in Raphanus sativus L. with high temperature. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 105:842–846Google Scholar
  7. Nettancourt D de (1977) Incompatibility in angiosperms. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Nishio T, Hinata K (1977) Analysis of S-specific Proteins in stigma of Brassica oleracea L. by isoelectric focusing. Heredity 38:391–396Google Scholar
  9. Okazaki K, Hinata K (1984) Analysis of S-alleles and S-glycoproteins in F1-hybrid varieties of Japanese radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Jpn J Breed 34:237–245Google Scholar
  10. Prabha H, Sood R, Gupta SC (1982) High temperature-induced inactivation of sporophytic self-incompatibility in Ipomea fistulosa. New Phytol 92:115–122Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Okazaki
    • 1
  • K. Hinata
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of AgricultureTohoku UniversitySendaiJapan

Personalised recommendations