Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 72, Issue 5, pp 706–709 | Cite as

Inheritance of S-methyl-L-cysteine sulphoxide and thiocyanate contents in forage rape (Brassica napus L.)

  • N. K. Paul
  • T. D. Johnston
  • C. F. Eagles
Article

Summary

Inheritance of thiocyanate and (+)S-methyl-L-cysteine sulphoxide (SMCO) contents were studied in a diallel cross involving five varieties of forage rape. Although both additive and dominance components were significant for the two characters, the greater mean squares of the additive gene effect indicated its greater importance. Non-allelic gene interaction was detected for thiocyanate only. Narrow sense heritability was relatively high for both characters. The general and specific combining ability effects and heterosis of the individual crosses, identified the potential of the cross ‘Nevin’ × ‘Akela’ for production of varieties with low thiocyanate content. Thiocyanate and SMCO contents were positively correlated, and they were not correlated with dry matter yield and its components.

Key words

Forage rape Thiocyanate SMCO Inheritance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bradshaw JE, Borzucki R (1981) The effect of cultivar and arvest date on the chemical composition and digestibility of fodder kale. J Sci Food Agric 32:965–972Google Scholar
  2. Ellerström S, Josefsson E (1967) Selection for low content of rhodanidogenic glucosides in fodder rape. Z Pflanzenzücht 58:128–135Google Scholar
  3. Gosden AF (1978a) Toxic constituents of forage crops. Rep Welsh Plant Breed Stn 1977, pp 226–241Google Scholar
  4. Gosden AF (1978b) An automated procedure for the estimation of thiocyanate in forage kale. J Sci Food Agric 29:597–600Google Scholar
  5. Gosden AF (1979) An automated procedure for the estimation of S-methylcysteine-sulphoxide in kale. J Sci Food Agric 30:892–898Google Scholar
  6. Griffing B (1956) Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Aust J Biol Sci 9:463–493Google Scholar
  7. Hayman BI (1954) The analysis of variance of diallel tables. Biometrics 10:235–244Google Scholar
  8. Jinks JL (1954) The analysis of continuous variation in a diallel cross ofNicotiana rustica varieties. Genetics 39: 767–788Google Scholar
  9. Jinks JL, Hayman BI (1953) The analysis of diallel crosses. Maize Genet Newslett 27:48–54Google Scholar
  10. Johnston TD, Gosden AF (1975) Thiocyanate in forage kale (Brassica oleracea L.). Euphytica 24:233–235Google Scholar
  11. Jones RM (1965) Analysis of variance of half diallel table. Heredity 20:117–121Google Scholar
  12. Miller PA, Williams JC, Robinson HF, Comstock RE (1958) Estimate of genotypic and environmental variances and covariances in upland cotton and their implications in selection. Agron J 50:126–131Google Scholar
  13. Smith RH (1975) Kale poisoning. Rep Rowett Res Inst 1974, pp 121–131Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. K. Paul
    • 1
  • T. D. Johnston
    • 1
  • C. F. Eagles
    • 1
  1. 1.Welsh Plant Breeding Station, Plas GogerddanAberystwythUK

Personalised recommendations