Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 19, Issue 11–12, pp 771–783 | Cite as

Client gender and sex-typed nonverbal behavior: Impact on impression formation

  • Rita Rachkowski
  • Kevin E. O'Grady
Article

Abstract

The influence of sex-typed nonverbal behavior of male and female clients on college students' perceptions was investigated. In a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial design, 156 male and female college students were exposed to a videotaped interview during which either a male or female client displayed either masculine or feminine sex-typed nonverbal behaviors. Subjects rated the perceived characteristics, prognosis for improvement, and problems of the client. Hypothesized main effects for client gender and sex-typed nonverbal behavior did not obtain. However, the hypothesized client gender by sex-typed nonverbal behavior interaction was found. This result was due primarily to a pervasive tendency to stigmatize the female clients displaying masculine sex-typed behaviors, in comparison to male clients displaying these same behaviors. Possible explanations and implications for these observed effects were discussed.

Keywords

College Student Social Psychology Factorial Design Nonverbal Behavior Behavior Interaction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. Social learning and personality development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1963.Google Scholar
  2. Barlow, D. H., Hayes, S. E., Nelson, R. O., Steele, D. L., Meeler, M. E., & Mills, J. R. (1979). Sex role motor behavior: A behavioral checklist. Behavioral Assessment, 1979, 1, 119–138.Google Scholar
  3. Bem, S., & Bem, D. J. Case study of a nonconscious ideology: Training the woman to know her place. In D. J. Bem (Ed.), Beliefs, attitudes, and human affairs. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1970.Google Scholar
  4. Birdwhistell, R. Kinesics and context. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  5. Broverman, I., Broverman, D., Clarkson, F., Rosenkrantz, P., & Vogel, S. Sex role stereotypes and clinical judgments of mental health. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1970, 34, 1–7.Google Scholar
  6. Cash, T., & Salzbach, R. The beauty of counseling: Effects of counselor physical attractiveness and self-disclosure on perception of counselor behavior. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1978, 25, 283–291.Google Scholar
  7. Davidson, C., & Abramowitz, S. Sex bias in clinical judgment: Later experimental returns. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1980, 4, 377–395.Google Scholar
  8. Davis, M., & Weitz, S. Sex differences in body movements and positions. In C. Mayo & N. M. Henley (Eds.), Gender and nonverbal behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.Google Scholar
  9. Fagot, B. L. The influence of sex of child on parental reactions to toddler children. Child Development, 1978, 49, 459–465.Google Scholar
  10. Farina, A., & Hagelauer, H. D. Sex and mental illness: The generosity of females. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1975, 43, 122.Google Scholar
  11. Farina, A., Felner, R. D., & Boudreau, L. A. Reactions of workers to male and female mental patient job applicnats. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1973, 41, 363–372.Google Scholar
  12. Finn, J. D. A general model for multivariate analysis. New York: Wiley, 1974.Google Scholar
  13. Gabriel, K. R. Simultaneous test procedures—Some theory of multiple comparisons. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1969, 40, 224–250.Google Scholar
  14. Harris, R. J. A primer of multivariate statistics (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  15. Henley, N. Body politics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1977.Google Scholar
  16. Lansky, L. M. The family structure also affects the model: Sex role attitudes in parent of preschool children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1967, 13, 139–150.Google Scholar
  17. Lehne, G. K. Homophobia among men. In D. S. David & R. Brannon (Eds.), The forty-nine percent majority: The male sex role. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1976.Google Scholar
  18. Mayo, C., & Henley, N. M. Gender and nonverbal behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.Google Scholar
  19. Mehrabian, A. Verbal and nonverbal interaction of strangers in a waiting situation. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 1971, 5, 127–138.Google Scholar
  20. Rosenkrantz, P., Vogel, S., Bee, H., Broverman, I., & Broverman, D. Sex-role stereotypes and self-concepts in college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1968, 32, 287–295.Google Scholar
  21. Safilios-Rothschild, C. Love, sex and sex roles. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1977.Google Scholar
  22. Schur, E. M. Labeling deviant behavior: Its sociological implications. New York: Harper & Row, 1971.Google Scholar
  23. Stockard, J., & Johnson, M. M. Sex roles: Sex inequality and sex role development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1980.Google Scholar
  24. Timm, N. H. Multivariate analysis: With applications in education and psychology. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1975.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rita Rachkowski
    • 1
  • Kevin E. O'Grady
    • 2
  1. 1.University of New MexicoUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MarylandCollege Park

Personalised recommendations