Sex Roles

, Volume 24, Issue 3–4, pp 209–221 | Cite as

His and her marriage: A multivariate study of gender and marital satisfaction

  • Blaine J. Fowers
Article

Abstract

This study examined gender differences in marital satisfaction using the multidimensional marital inventory ENRICH. Contrary to previous research, the results indicated that men are somewhat more satisfied with their marriages than women. The findings also suggest that religion is a more important part of the marriage for men, whereas women esposed egalitarian roles to a greater extent. A significant interaction was found between marital distress and gender on the Sexual Relationship, Communication, Parenting and Children, and Equalitarian Roles scales, indicating that these areas may be particularly important in distressed couples. The differences in husbands' and wives' marital satisfaction found in this study are consistent with research suggesting that men obtain greater mental health benefits from marriage than do women. The explanation of the obtained gender differences are discussed with regard to measurement issues, sampling procedures, and power and task inequities. Sampling and differences in marital tasks and power are cited as the best explanations of the findings.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anson, O. (1989). Women's health and living with spouse or other adults. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 185–194.Google Scholar
  2. Bernard, J. (1972). The future of marriage. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  3. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The perceived quality of life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  4. Donahue, K. C., & Ryder, R. G. (1982). A methodological note on marital satisfaction variables. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 743–747.Google Scholar
  5. Edmonds, V. H. (1967). Marital conventionalization: Definition and measurement. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 29, 681–688.Google Scholar
  6. Fowers, B. J., & Olson, D. H. (1989). ENRICH marital inventory: A discriminant validity and cross-validation assessment. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 15, 65–79.Google Scholar
  7. Glenn, N. D. (1975). The contribution of marriage to the psychological well-being of males and females. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 37, 594–600.Google Scholar
  8. Glenn, N. D., & Weaver, C. N. (1981). The contribution of marital happiness to global happiness. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 161–168.Google Scholar
  9. Gove, W. R. (1972). The relationship between sex roles, mental illness and marital status. Social Forces, 51, 34–44.Google Scholar
  10. Gove, W. R. (1973). Sex, marital status and mortality. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 79, 45–67.Google Scholar
  11. Gove, W. R. (1979). Sex differences in the epidemiology of mental disorder: Evidence and explanations. In E. S. Gomberg & V. Franks (Eds.), Gender and disordered behavior: Sex differences in psychopathology. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  12. Gove, W. R., & Tudor, J. F. (1973). Adult sex roles and mental illness. American Journal of Sociology, 79, 45–67.Google Scholar
  13. Gove, W. R., Hughes, M., & Style, C. B. (1983). Does marriage have positive effects on the psychological well-being of the individual? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 122–131.Google Scholar
  14. Gray-Little, B., & Burks, N. (1983). Power and satisfaction in marriage: A review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 513–538.Google Scholar
  15. Huston, T. L. (1983). Power. In H. H. Kelley, E. Berscheid, A. Christensen, J. H. Harvey, T. L. Huston, G. Levinger, E. McClintock, L. A. Peplau & D. R. Peterson (Eds.), Close Relationships. New York: W. H. Freeman and Co.Google Scholar
  16. Huston, T. L., McHale, S. M., & Crouter, A. C. (1984). When the honeymoon's over: Changes in the marriage relationship over the first year. In R. Gilmore & S. Duck (Eds.), The emerging field of personal relationships. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. Johnson, D. R., White, L. K., Edwards, J. N., & Booth, A. (1986). Dimensions of marital quality: Toward methodological and conceptual refinement. Journal of Family Issues, 7, 31–49.Google Scholar
  18. Kazak, A. E., Jarmas, A., & Snitzer, L. (1988). The assessment of marital satisfaction: An evaluation of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Journal of Family Psychology, 2, 82–91.Google Scholar
  19. Olson, D. H., & Fowers, B. J. (1989). ENRICH Marital Satisfaction scale: Reliability and validity. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Educational and Psychological Studies, P. O. Box 248065, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33124.Google Scholar
  20. Olson, D. H., Fournier, D. G., & Druckman, J. M. (1983). PREPARE/ENRICH counselor's manual. PREPARE/ENRICH Inc., P. O. Box 190, Minneapolis, MN 55440.Google Scholar
  21. Olson, D. H., McCubbin, H. I., Barnes, H. L., Larsen, A. S., Muxen, M. J., & Wilson, M. A. (1983). Families: What makes them work. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Pearlin, L. I., & Johnson, J. S. (1977). Marital status, life strains and depression. American Sociological Review, 42, 704–715.Google Scholar
  23. Schumm, W. R., Jurich, A. P., Bollman, S. R., & Bugaighis, M. A. (1985). His and her marriage revisited. Journal of Family Issues 6, 221–227.Google Scholar
  24. Smith, M. L., & Glass, G. V. (1977). Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. American Psychologist, 32, 752–760.Google Scholar
  25. Spanier, G. B., & Lewis, R. A. (1980). Marital quality: A review of the seventies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 96–110.Google Scholar
  26. Thompson, L. (1988). Men, women and marital quality. Journal of Family Psychology, 2, 95–100.Google Scholar
  27. Weingarten, H. R. (1985). Marital status and well-being: A national study comparing first-married, currently divorced, and remarried adults. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 653–661.Google Scholar
  28. Whisman, M. A., & Jacobson, N. S. (1989). Depression, marital satisfaction, and marital and personality measures of sex roles. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 15, 177–186.Google Scholar
  29. Williams, D. G. (1988). Gender, marriage and psychosocial well-being. Journal of Family Issues, 9, 452–468.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Blaine J. Fowers
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations