Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 67–73 | Cite as

Baby X revisited

  • Laura S. Sidorowicz
  • G. Sparks Lunney
Article

Abstract

The present study is a replication of a study reported by Seavy, Katz, and Zalk (1975) in which subjects interacted with a 3-month-old female infant who was either introduced as a boy, a girl, or without any specific gender information. In the present study infants of both genders were used as stimuli, and 60 college undergraduates served as subjects. The results of the present study are similar to the findings of the original investigators. The gender labels provided to the subject resulted in highly sex-stereotyped behavior concerning toy choice.

Keywords

Social Psychology Female Infant College Undergraduate Specific Gender Study Infant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bronson, W. Exploratory behavior of 15-month-old infants in a novel situation. Paper presented at the meeting for the Society for Research in Child Development, Minneapolis, 1971.Google Scholar
  2. Fling, S., & Manosevitz, M. Sex typing in nursery school children's play interests. Developmental Psychology, 1972, 7, 146–152.Google Scholar
  3. Gagnon, J., & Simon, W. Sexual conduct. Chicago: Aldine, 1973.Google Scholar
  4. Gesell, A., & Ilg. L. Infant and child in the culture of today. New York: Harper & Row, 1942.Google Scholar
  5. Goldberg, S. The inevitability of partriarchy. New York: William Morrow and Co., 1973.Google Scholar
  6. Goldberg, S., & Lewis, R. Play behavior in the year-old infant: Early sex differences. Child Development, 1969, 40, 21–31.Google Scholar
  7. Jacklin, C., Maccoby, E., & Dick, A. Barrier behavior and toy preference: Sex differences (and their absence) in the year-old child. Child Development, 1973, 44, 196–200.Google Scholar
  8. Landy, D. Tropical childhood. New York: Harper & Row, 1965.Google Scholar
  9. Lws, J., & Schwartz, P. Sexual scripts. Hinsdale, Ill.: Dryden Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  10. Lewis, M. State as an infant-environmental interaction: An analysis of mother-infant behavior as a function of sex. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1972, 18, 95–211.Google Scholar
  11. Liebert, R., & Hanratty, M. Effects of sex-typed information on children's toy preference. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1971, 119, 113–136.Google Scholar
  12. Lunney, G. S., The social construction of sexual intercourse, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, City University of New York, 1978.Google Scholar
  13. Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. The psychology of sex differences. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  14. Margolin, G., & Patterson, G. Differential consequences provided by mothers and fathers for their sons and daughters. Developmental Psychology, 1975, 11, 537–538. 11, 537–538.Google Scholar
  15. Minton, C., Kagan, J., & Levine, J. Maternal control and obedience in the two-year-old child. Child Development, 1971, 42, 1873–1894.Google Scholar
  16. Montemayor, R. Children's performance in a game and their attraction to it as a function of sex-typed labels. Child Development, 1974, 45, 152–156.Google Scholar
  17. Moss, H. Sex, age and state as determinants of mother-infant interaction. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1967, 13, 19–36.Google Scholar
  18. Nash, J. Developmental psychology: A psychological approach. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1970.Google Scholar
  19. Nerlove, S., Munroe, R., & Munroe, R. Effect of environmental experience on spatial ability: A replication. Journal of Social Psychology, 1971, 84, 3–10.Google Scholar
  20. Pederson, F., & Robson, K. Father participation in infancy. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1969, 39, 466–472.Google Scholar
  21. Rheingold, H., & Cook, K. The contents of boys' and girls' rooms as an index of parent behavior. Child Development, 1975, 46, 459–463.Google Scholar
  22. Rubin, T., Provenzano, F., & Luria, Z. The eye of the beholder: Parents' view on sex of newborns. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1974, 44, 512–519.Google Scholar
  23. Saegert, S., & Hart, R. The development of environmental competence in girls and boys. In P. Burnet (Ed.), Women in society. Chicago: Maaroufa Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  24. Seavey, C., Katz, P., & Zalk, S. Baby X: The effect of gender labels on adult responses to infants. Sex Roles, 1975, 1, 103–109.Google Scholar
  25. Serbin, L., O'Leary, K., Kent, R., & Tonick, I. A comparison of teacher response to the preacademic and problem behavior of boys and girls. Child Development, 1973, 44, 796–804.Google Scholar
  26. Stein, A., Pohly, S., Pohly, R., & Mueller, E. The influence of masculine, feminine, and neutral tasks on children's achievement behavior: Expectancies of success and attainment value. Child Development, 1971, 42, 195–207.Google Scholar
  27. Tasch, R. The role of the father in the family. Journal of Experimental Education, 1952, 20, 319–361.Google Scholar
  28. Williams, J., Bennett, S., & Best, D. Awareness and expression of sex stereotypes in young children. Developmental Psychology, 1975, 11, 635–642.Google Scholar
  29. Yarrow, L., Rubenstein, J., & Pederson, F. Dimensions of early stimulation: Differential effects on infant development. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1971.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura S. Sidorowicz
    • 1
  • G. Sparks Lunney
    • 2
  1. 1.Hunter College of the City University of New YorkUSA
  2. 2.Center for the Study of Women and Sex RolesThe Graduate School and University Center of the City University of New YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations