Fear of success: A personality trait or a response to occupational deviance and role overload?
- 78 Downloads
- 11 Citations
Abstract
This study clarifies the extent to which individuals' fear-of-success scores may vary with the presence or absence of occupational deviance and/or role overload in stimulus materials describing situations of female competitive success. Four TAT-type verbal cues describing female competitive success in situations of presence or absence of occupational deviance and/or role overload were administered to 60 males and 60 females, ages 30 to 60. Horner and colleagues' revised scoring system was employed. Results of planned comparisons showing no effect of sex of participant on scores, but significant effects of deviance and overload, are interpreted as support for a situational as opposed to motive interpretation of expressed fear of success.
Keywords
Social Psychology Personality Trait Stimulus Material Plan Comparison Competitive SuccessPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Atkinson, J. W. (Ed.). Motives in fantasy, action, and society. Princeton: Van Nostrand, 1958.Google Scholar
- Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. The social construction of reality. New York: Doubleday Anchor, 1967.Google Scholar
- Feather, N. T., & Raphaelson, A. W. Fear of success in Australian and American student groups: Motive or sex role stereotype? Journal of Personality, 1974, 42(21), 190–201.Google Scholar
- Feather, N. T., & Simon, J. G. Fear of success and causal attribution for outcome. Journal of Personality, 1973, 42(4), 525–542.Google Scholar
- Garland, T. N. The better half? The man in the dual professional family. In C. Safilios-Rothschild (Ed.), Towards a sociology of women. Lexington, Mass.: Xerox College Publishing, 1972.Google Scholar
- Hall, D. T. A model for coping with role conflict: The role behavior of college educated women. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1972, 17, 471–486.Google Scholar
- Hayes, W. L. Statistics for psychologists. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1963.Google Scholar
- Hoffman, L. W. Fear of success in males and females: 1965 and 1971. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974, 42(3), 353–358.Google Scholar
- Horner, M. S. Sex differences in achievement motivation and performance in competitive and non-competitive situations (Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, 1968). Dissertation Abstracts International, 1969, 30, 407B. (University Microfilms No. 69-12, 135) (Cited here as Horner, 1968.)Google Scholar
- Horner, M. S. The motive to avoid success and changing aspirations of college women. In J. M. Bardwick (Ed.), Readings on the psychology of women. New York: Harper & Row, 1972.Google Scholar
- Horner, M. S., Tresemer, D. W., Berens, A. E., & Watson, R. I. Scoring manual for an empirically derived scoring system for motive to avoid success. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University, 1973.Google Scholar
- Jellison, J. M., Jackson-White, R., Bruder, R. A., & Martyna, W. Achievement behavior: A situational interpretation. Sex Roles, 1975, 1(4), 369–384.Google Scholar
- Kresojevich, I. Z. Motivation to avoid sucess in women as related to year in school, academic achievement, and success context. Abstracted in Dissertation Abstract International, 33, 56B, 2348–2349.Google Scholar
- Lockheed, M. E. Female motive to avoid success — a psychological barrier or a response to deviancy? Sex Roles, 1975, 1(1), 41–50.Google Scholar
- McClelland, D., Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A., & Lowell, E. L. The achievement motive. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1953.Google Scholar
- Midgeley, N., & Abrams, M. S. Fear of success and locus of control in young women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974, 42(5), 737.Google Scholar
- Monahan, L., Kuhn, D., & Shaver, P. Intrapsychic versus cultural explanations of “fear of success” motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 24(1), 60–64.Google Scholar
- Moore, L. L. The relationship of academic group membership to the motive to avoid success in women. Abstracted in Dissertation Abstracts International, 1972, 32, 8A, 4355.Google Scholar
- O'Leary, V. E., & Hammack, B. Sex-role orientation and achievement context as determinants of the motive to avoid success. Sex Roles, 1975, 1(3), 225–234.Google Scholar
- Pirojnikoff, L. The achievement motive and other personality traits as measured by Edwards Personality Preference Schedule and their relation to learning, the Authoritarian Scale, and speed of performance. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Washington, 1955.Google Scholar
- Poloma, M. M. Role conflict and the married professional. In C. Safilios-Rothschild (Ed.), Towards a sociology of women. Lexington, Mass.: Xerox College Publishing, 1972.Google Scholar
- Rappaport, R., & Rappaport, R. N. The dual-career family: A variant pattern and social change. In C. Safilios-Rothschild (Ed.), Towards a sociology of women. Lexington, Mass.: Xerox College Publishing, 1972.Google Scholar
- Robbins, L., & Robbins, E. Comment on: “Toward an understanding of achievement related conflicts in women.” Journal of Social Issues, 1973, 24(1), 133–137.Google Scholar
- Sieber, S. D. Toward a theory of role accumulation. American Sociological Review, 1974, 39, 567–578.Google Scholar
- Spence, J. T. The TAT and attitude toward achievement in women: A new look at the motive to avoid success and a new method of measurement. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974, 42(3), 427–437.Google Scholar
- Tresemer, D. Fear of success: Popular, but unproven. Psychology Today, 1974, 7(10), 82–85.Google Scholar
- U.S. Bureau of the Census. Census of population: 1970. Subject reports. Final report. Occupational characteristics (PC2-7A). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Goverment Printing Office, 1973.Google Scholar
- U.S. Department of Commerce. Methodology and scores of socio-economic status (Working Paper No. 15). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1963.Google Scholar
- Veroff, J., Wilcox, S., & Atkinson, J. S. The achievement motive in high school and college age women. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1953, 48, 108–119.Google Scholar