Sex Roles

, Volume 22, Issue 3–4, pp 167–175 | Cite as

Research on working women: A report card of 22 journals

  • Leonard H. Chusmir
  • Dorothy P. Moore
  • Janet S. Adams


The study was part of an official project of the Women in Management Division of the Academy of Management to examine the status of research in gender issues in organizations. It specifically looked at 22 major scholarly and trade journals plus the Proceedings of the Academy of Management for the six-year period of 1983–1988 to determine quantity, patterns, and trends in publication of research on issues of interest to the domain of the division. Results show a downward trend in gender-issue publication at a time when working women are becoming an ever-increasing percentage of the work force. This is particularly true of the so-called prestige journals. Psychology journals accounted for 64% of the total, management 13.4%, personnel 19%, and Proceedings 3.5%. Implications for research and careers are discussed.


Social Psychology Downward Trend Work Force Gender Issue Report Card 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Astin, H., & Bayer, A. E. (1979). Pervasive sex differences in the academic reward system: Scholarship, marriage, and what else? In D. R. Lewis & W. E. Becker (Eds.), Academic rewards in higher education. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  2. Boice, R., & Kelly, K. A. (1987). Writing viewed by disenfranchise groups: A study of women women's college faculty. Written Communication, 4, 299–309.Google Scholar
  3. Coe, R. K., & Weinstock, I. (1984). Evaluating the management journals: A second look. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 660–666.Google Scholar
  4. Diamond, A. M., Jr. (1985). The money value of citations to single-authored and multiple-authored articles. Scientometrics, 8, 315–320.Google Scholar
  5. Emmons, C. (1982). A longitudinal study of the careers of a cohort of assistance professors in psychology. American Psychologist, 37, 1228–38.Google Scholar
  6. Ferber, M. A., Loeb, J. W., & Lowry, H. M. (1978). The economic status of women faculty: A reappraisal. Human Resources, 13, 385–401.Google Scholar
  7. Hammermesh, D. S., Johnson, G. E., & Weisbrod, B. A. (1982). Scholarships, citations and salaries: Economic rewards in economics. Southern Economic Journal, 49(2), 472–481.Google Scholar
  8. Hansen, W. L., Weisbrod, B. A., & Strauss, R. P. (1978). Modeling the earnings and research productivity of academic economists. Journal of Political Economy, 86, 729–741.Google Scholar
  9. Katz, D. A. (1973). Faculty salaries, promotions and productivity at a large university. The American Economic Review, 63, 469–477.Google Scholar
  10. Liebowitz, S. J., & Palmer, J. P. (1984). Assessing the relative impacts of economic journals. Journal of Economic Literature, 22, 77–88.Google Scholar
  11. Lindsey, D. (1980). Production and citation measures in the sociology science. Social Studies of Science, 10, 145–162.Google Scholar
  12. Sharplin, A. D., & Mabry, R. H. (1985). The relative importance of journals used in management research: An alternative ranking. Human Relations, 38(2), 139–148.Google Scholar
  13. Siegfried, J. J., & White, K. J. (1973). Teaching and publishing as determinants of academic salaeires. Journal of Economics Education, 4(2), 90–99.Google Scholar
  14. Sitterly, C., & Duke, C. W. (1988). A woman's place: Management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  15. Stahl, M. J., Leap, T. L., & Wei, Z. Z. (1988). Publication in leading management journals as a measure of institutional reseach productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 707–720.Google Scholar
  16. Tuckman, H. P., & Leahey, J. (1975). What is an article worth? Jouirnal of Political Economy, 83, 951–967.Google Scholar
  17. U.S. Department of Labor. (1989, August). Handbook of Labor Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  18. Vocino, T., & Elliott, R. (1984). Public administrative journal prestige: A time series analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 43–51.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leonard H. Chusmir
    • 1
  • Dorothy P. Moore
    • 2
  • Janet S. Adams
    • 3
  1. 1.Florida International UniversityUSA
  2. 2.The CitadelCharleston
  3. 3.Kennesaw State CollegeUSA

Personalised recommendations