Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 22, Issue 3–4, pp 151–166 | Cite as

Attitudes and expectations about children with nontraditional and traditional gender roles

  • Carol Lynn Martin
Article

Abstract

Cross-sex behavior in boys generally is viewed more negatively than cross-sex behavior in girls. The two goals of this study were to assess attitudes toward tomboys and sissies, and to explore possible causes for differential evaluations of tomboys and sissies. Eighty undergraduates completed questionnaires assessing their attitudes toward tomboys and sissies, and their expectations for the future adult behavior of typical boys, typical girls, tomboys, and sissies. Results revealed that sissies were more negatively evaluated than tomboys. Women were more accepting of, and perceived more societal acceptance for cross-sex children, than were men. One reason for the negative evaluation of sissies may be that there is more concern for their future outcomes than for tomboys. Analyses of predictions concerning future behavior showed that sissies, more so than tomboys, were expected to continue to show cross-gender behavior into adulthood. Also, sissies were rated as likely to be less well adjusted and more likely to be homosexual when they grow up than other children. The accuracy of these beliefs and their implications for child-rearing practices are discussed.

Keywords

Social Psychology Gender Role Negative Evaluation Future Behavior Differential Evaluation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anthill, J. K. (1987). Parents' beliefs and values about sex roles, sex differences, and sexuality: Their sources and implications. In P. Shaver & C. Hendrick (Eds.), Review of Personality and Social Psychology: Sex and Gender, Vol. 7, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Ashmore, R. D., & DelBoca, F. K. (1981). Conceptual approaches to stereotypes and stereotyping. In D. L. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Atkinson, J., & Endsley, R. C. (1976). Influence of sex of child and parent on parental reactions to hypothetical parent-child situations. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 94, 131–147.Google Scholar
  4. Bell, A. P., Weinberg, M. S., & Hammersmith, S. K. (1981). Sexual preference: Its development in men and women. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.Google Scholar
  6. Bem, S. L. (1975). Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 634–643.Google Scholar
  7. Bradbard, M. R., Martin, C. L., Endsley, R. C., & Halverson, C. F. (1986). Influence of sex stereotypes on children's exploration and memory: A competence versus performance distinction. Developmental Psychology, 22, 481–486.Google Scholar
  8. Carter, D. B., & McCloskey, L. A. (1984). Peers and the maintenance of sex-typed behavior: The development of children's conceptions of cross-gender behavior in their peers. Social Cognition, 2, 294–314.Google Scholar
  9. Damon, W. (1979). The social world of the child. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  10. Fagot, B. I. (1977). Consequences of moderate cross-gender behavior in preschool children. Child Development, 48, 902–907.Google Scholar
  11. Feinman, S. (1974). Approval of cross-sex-role behavior. Psychological Reports, 35, 643–648.Google Scholar
  12. Feinman, S. (1981). Why is cross-sex-role behavior more approved for girls than for boys? A status characteristic approach. Sex Roles, 7, 289–299.Google Scholar
  13. Gilbert, L. A. (1981). Toward mental health: The benefits of psychological androgyny. Professional Psychology, 12, 29–38.Google Scholar
  14. Green, R. (1975). Children called “sissy” and “tomboy,” adolescents who cross-dress and adults who wants to change sex. In R. Green (Ed.), Human sexuality: A health practitioner's text. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
  15. Green, R. (1987). The “Sissy boy syndrome” and the development of homosexuality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Grellert, E. A., Newcomb, M. D. & Bentler, P. M. (1982). Childhood play activities of male and female homosexuals and heterosexuals. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 11, 451–478.Google Scholar
  17. Grove, W. M., & Andreasen, N. C. (1982). Simultaneous tests of many hypotheses in exploratory research. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 170, 3–8.Google Scholar
  18. Hartup, W. W. (1983). Peer relations. In P. H. Mussen (Series Ed.) & E. M. Hetherington (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 4. Socialization, personality, and social development. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. Hemmer, J. D., & Kleiber, D. A. (1981). Tomboys and sissies: Androgynous children? Sex Roles, 7, 1205–1212.Google Scholar
  20. Kaplan, A. G. (1976). Androgyny as a model of mental health for women: From theory to therapy. In A. G. Kaplan & J. P. Bean (Eds.), Beyond sex-role stereotypes: Readings toward a psychology of androgyny. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  21. Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders.Google Scholar
  22. Kinsey, A. C., Pomeory, W. B., Martin, C. E., & Gebhard, P. H. (1953). Sexual behavior in the human female. Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders.Google Scholar
  23. Lamb, M. E., & Roopnarine, J. (1979). Peer influences on sex-role development in preschoolers. Child Development, 50, 1219–1222.Google Scholar
  24. Lamb, M. E., Esterbrooks, M. A., & Holden, G. W. (1980). Reinforcement and punishment among preschoolers: Characteristics, effects, and correlates. Child Development, 51, 1230–1236.Google Scholar
  25. Langlois, J. H., & Downs, A. C. (1980). Mothers, fathers, and peers as socialization agents of sex-typed play behavior in young children. Child Development, 51, 1237–1247.Google Scholar
  26. Martin, C. L. (1987). A ratio measure of sex stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 489–499.Google Scholar
  27. McCauley, C., & Stitt, C. L. (1978). An individual and quantitative measure of stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 929–940.Google Scholar
  28. Paulhus, D. L., & Martin, C. L. (1988). Functional flexibility: A new conception of interpersonal flexibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 88–101.Google Scholar
  29. Plumb, P., & Cowan, G. (1984). A developmental study of destereotyping and androgynous activity preferences of tomboys, nontomboys, and males. Sex Roles, 10, 703–712.Google Scholar
  30. Saghir, M. T., & Robins, E. (1973). Male and female homosexuality. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
  31. Taylor, M. C., & Hall, J. A. (1982). Psychological androgyny: Theories, methods, and conclusions. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 347–366.Google Scholar
  32. Zucker, K. J., Finegan, J. K., Doering, R. W., & Bradley, S. J. (1984). Two subgroups of gender-problem children. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 13, 27–39.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carol Lynn Martin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Family Resources and Human DevelopmentArizona State UniversityTempe

Personalised recommendations