Sex Roles

, Volume 22, Issue 1–2, pp 29–42

Gender and response effects in telephone interviews about gender characteristics

  • Lloyd B. Lueptow
  • Susan L. Moser
  • Brian F. Pendleton


This study investigates the effect of gender on responses to questions about sex role orientations. Literature on gender effects in survey interviews, job interviews and counseling studies, and experiments leads to hypotheses that male interviewers will elicit more response effects than female interviewers, especially from females; that female respondents will show desirability effects more than males; and that respondents, especially female respondents, will disclose liberal orientations more to female than to male interviewers. Findings show that male interviewers do not elicit more response effects, especially among females, and there seem to be desirability effects operating instead of conformity effects, especially for female interviewers. Females, and low-power, highly educated males exhibit more liberal responses to female interviewers. This study demonstrates that in areas where interviewer—respondent question content is related to salient dimensions, response effects are observed and constitute potentially damaging sources of error.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Basow, S. A. (1986). Gender stereotypes: Traditions and alternatives (2nd ed.). Monterey, CA: Brookes/Cole.Google Scholar
  2. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.Google Scholar
  3. Dijkstra, W. (1987). Intervieweing style and respondent behavior an experimental study of the survey-interview. Sociological Methods and Research, 16, 309–334.Google Scholar
  4. Dijkstra, W., & Van Der Zouwen, J. (Eds.). (1982). Response Behavior in the Survey-Interview. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Fletcher, C. (1983). Sex of interviewer as an influence on interviewee expectations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 169–170.Google Scholar
  6. Fletcher, C. & Spencer, A. (1984). Sex candidate and sex of interviewer as determinants of self-presentation orientation in interviews: An experimental study. International Review of Applied Psychology, 33, 305–313.Google Scholar
  7. Freeman, J., & Butler, E. (1976). Some source of interviewer variance in surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 40, 79–91.Google Scholar
  8. Galla, J. P., Frisone, J. D., Jeffrey, L. R., & Gaer, E. P. (1981). Effect of experimenter's gender on responses to a sex-role attitude questionnaire. Psychological Reports, 49, 935–940.Google Scholar
  9. Grantham, R. J. (1973). Effects of counselor sex, race, and language style on black students in initial interviews. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 20, 553–559.Google Scholar
  10. Grimes, M. D., & Hansen, G. L. (1984). Response bias in sex-role attitude measurement. Sex Roles, 10, 67–72.Google Scholar
  11. Groves, R. M., & Fultz, N. (1985). Gender effects among telephone interviewers in a survey of economic attitudes. Sociological Methods and Research, 14, 31–52.Google Scholar
  12. Hill, C. E. (1975). Sex of client and sex and experience level of counselor. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 22, 6–11.Google Scholar
  13. Johnson, W. T., & Delamater, J. D. (1976). Response effects in sex surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 40, 165–181.Google Scholar
  14. Kenkel, W. F. (1961). Sex of observer and spousal roles in decision making. Marriage and Family Living, 23, 185–186.Google Scholar
  15. Landis, J. R., Sullivan, D., & Sheley, J. (1973). Feminist attitudes as related to sex of the interviewer. Pacific Sociological Review, 16, 305–314.Google Scholar
  16. Lueptow, L. B. (1984). Adolescent sex roles and social change. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  17. McBroom, W. H. (1987). Longitudinal change in sex role orientations: Differences between men and women. Sex Roles, 16, 439–442.Google Scholar
  18. Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The Psychology of Sex Differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Mishler, E. G. (1986). Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Nealon, J. (1983). The effects of male vs. female interviewers. pp. 139–141 in Proccedins of the Section on Survey Research Methods of the American Statistical Association.Google Scholar
  21. Nederhof, A. J. (1981). Impact of interviewer's sex on volunteering by females. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 52, 25–26.Google Scholar
  22. Nyquist, L. V., & Spence, J. T. (1986). Effects of dispositional dominance and sex role expectations on leadership behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 87–93.Google Scholar
  23. Quarm, D. (1983). The effect of gender on sex-role attitudes. Sociological Focus, 16, 285–303.Google Scholar
  24. Rumenik, D. K., Copasso, D. R., & Hendrick, C. (1977). Experimenter sex effects in behavioral research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 852–877.Google Scholar
  25. Spence, J. T., Helmrich, R. L. (1971). The attitude toward women scale: An objective instrument to measure attitudes toward the rights and roles of women in contemporary society, Journal Supplement Abstract Service Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 2, 66.Google Scholar
  26. Sudman, S., & Bradburn, D. L. (1974). Response Effects in Surveys: A Review and Synthesis. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  27. Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1977). Sex stereotype index, favorability, strength, and activity scores for the 300 adjectives of the Adjective Check List. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  28. Von Baeyer, C. L., Sherk, D. L., & Zanna, M. P (1981). Impression management in the job interview: When the female applicant meets the male (chauvinist) interviewer. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 45–51.Google Scholar
  29. Zanna, M. P., & Pack, S. J. (1975). On the self-fulfilling nature of apparent sex differences in behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 583–591.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lloyd B. Lueptow
    • 1
  • Susan L. Moser
    • 1
  • Brian F. Pendleton
    • 1
  1. 1.University of AkronUSA

Personalised recommendations