Sex Roles

, Volume 12, Issue 9–10, pp 1033–1039 | Cite as

Gender differences in the perception of women in magazine advertising

  • Susan R. Rossi
  • Joseph S. Rossi
Article

Abstract

Male and female college students (N=137) rated 10 control and 10 target magazine advertisements for appeal and for the perceived sexism displayed in the ads. Males did not differ in their ratings of target and control ad appeal. Females rated target ads as less appealing than control ads, and gave target ads lower appeal ratings than did males. Females also rated target ads as more sexist than did males, although both sexes rated target ads as more sexist than control ads. All subjects also completed the Attitudes Toward Women Scale, on which females displayed more liberal attitudes than males.

Keywords

Gender Difference College Student Social Psychology Female College Female College Student 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, M. W., & Judd, B. Do nudes in ads enhance brand recall? Journal of Advertising Research, 1978, 18(1), 47–50.Google Scholar
  2. Culley, J. D., & Bennett, R. Selling women, selling blacks. Journal of Communication, 1976, 26(4) 160–174.Google Scholar
  3. Goldberg, P. A., Katz, J. E., & Rappeport, S. Posture and prediction on the Attitudes Toward Women Scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1979, 3, 403–406.Google Scholar
  4. Morrison, B. J., & Sherman, R. C. Who responds to sex in advertising? Journal of Advertising Research, 1972, 12(2), 15–19.Google Scholar
  5. Peterson, R. A., & Kerin, R. A. The female role in advertisements: Some experimental evidence. Journal of Marketing, 1977, 41, 59–63.Google Scholar
  6. Rossi, J. S., & Rossi, S. R. Component structure of the Attitudes Toward Women Scale. Unpublished raw data, 1982.Google Scholar
  7. Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. A short version of the Attitudes Toward Women Scale (AWS). Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1973, 2, 219–220.Google Scholar
  8. Steadman, M. How sexy illustrations affect brand recall. Journal of Advertising Research, 1969, 9(1), 15–18.Google Scholar
  9. Stemple, D., & Tyler, J. E. Sexism in advertising. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 1974, 34, 271–273.Google Scholar
  10. Venkatesan, M., & Losco, J. Women in magazine ads: 1959–1971. Journal of Advertising Research, 1975, 15, 49–54.Google Scholar
  11. Wise, G. L., King, A. L., & Merenski, J. P. Reactions to sexy ads vary with age. Journal of Advertising Research, 1974, 14(4), 11–16.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan R. Rossi
    • 1
  • Joseph S. Rossi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Chafee Social Science CenterUniversity of Rhode IslandKingston

Personalised recommendations