Sex Roles

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 449–461 | Cite as

Gender and prestige preference in language

  • John Angle
  • Sharlene Hesse-Biber


A literature in sociolinguistics asserts that women tend to adopt and use the speech of richer people more readily than men where the difference between the speech of rich and poor is a variant/variant, a standard language/dialect, or a standard language/creole difference. This generalization is not found to be true of second language learning. Learning a second language differs from learning a variant of one's own or a very closely related form in that it requires more exposure and motivation. If these factors are controlled for, the effect predicted by the Gender and Prestige Preference Theory ought to appear. It does not. Whatever female preference there may be for the language of the rich, it is very small.


Social Psychology Language Learning Related Form Female Preference Preference Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Albó, X. Social constraints on cochabamba quechua. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  2. Ammon, U. Dialekt und Einheitssprache in ihrer sozialen Verflechtung. Weinheim: Beltz Verlag, 1973.Google Scholar
  3. Angle, J. A test of the economic reward theory of mass second language learning. Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, 1977.Google Scholar
  4. Angle, J. Economic reward and second language learning. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  5. Ashen, F. Speech variation among Negroes in a small southern community. Doctoral dissertation, New York University, 1969.Google Scholar
  6. Biondi, L. The Italian-American child: His sociolinguistic acculturation. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  7. Blalock, H. Toward a theory of minority-group relations. New York: Wiley, 1967.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, D. Affective variables in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 1973, 23, 231–244.Google Scholar
  9. Burling, R. Man's many voices. New York: Holt, 1970.Google Scholar
  10. Cedergren, H. The interplay of social and linguistic factors in Panama. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, 1973.Google Scholar
  11. Day, R. Decreolization: Coexistent systems and the post-creole continuum. In D. DeCamp & I. Hancock (Eds.), Pidgins and Creoles. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  12. Dillard, J. L. All-American English. New York: Random House, 1975.Google Scholar
  13. Dressler, W., & Wodak-Leodolter, R. Language preservation and language death in Brittany. Linguistics, 1977, 191, 33–44.Google Scholar
  14. Edelsky, C. Subjective reactions to sex-linked language. Journal of Social Psychology, 1976, 99, 97–104.Google Scholar
  15. Edwards, A. D. Language in culture and class. London: Heineman, 1976.Google Scholar
  16. Epstein, E. Value orientation and the English language in Puerto Rico. Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago, 1966.Google Scholar
  17. Epstein, E. Politics and education in Puerto Rico. Metuchen, N.J.: Scarecrow, 1970.Google Scholar
  18. Farb, P. Word play. New York: Knopf, 1974.Google Scholar
  19. Ferguson, C. Diglossia. Word, 1959, 15, 325–340.Google Scholar
  20. Fischer, J. L. Social influences on the choice of a linguistic variant. Word, 1958, 14, 47–56.Google Scholar
  21. Gagnon, M. Quelques facteurs déterminant l'attitude vis-à-vis de l'Anglais, langue seconde. In R. Darnell (Ed.), Canadian languages in their social context. Edmonton: Linguistic Research, 1973.Google Scholar
  22. Gardner, R., & Lambert, W. Attitudes and motivation in second language learning. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House, 1972.Google Scholar
  23. Gauchat, L. L'unité phonétique dans le patois d'une commune. Halle: Verlag von Max Niemeyer, 1905.Google Scholar
  24. Goodman, L. A general model for the analysis of surveys. American Journal of Sociology, 1972, 77, 1035–1086.Google Scholar
  25. Goodman, L. Causal analysis of data from panel studies and other kinds of surveys. American Journal of Sociology, 1973, 78, 1135–1191.Google Scholar
  26. Grillet, J. The patois situation in France. Anthropological Linguistics, 1974, 16(5), 197–201.Google Scholar
  27. Guiora, A., Brannon, R., & Dull, C. Empathy and second language learning. Language Learning, 1972, 22, 111–130.Google Scholar
  28. Gumperz, J. Language problems in the rural development of North India. In A. S. Dill (Ed.), Language in social groups. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  29. Hymes, D. (Ed.). Pidginization and creolization of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  30. Jespersen, O. Language. New York: Holt, 1925.Google Scholar
  31. Jespersen, O. Mankind, nation and individual. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1946.Google Scholar
  32. Key, M. Male/female language. Metuchen, N.J.: Scarecrow, 1975.Google Scholar
  33. Kramer, C. Women's speech: Separate but unequal? In B. Thorne & N. Henley (Eds.), Language and sex. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House, 1975.Google Scholar
  34. Labov, W. The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics, 1966.Google Scholar
  35. Labov, W. The study of nonstandard English. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics, 1970.Google Scholar
  36. Labov, W. The study of language in its social context. In J. Fishman (Ed.), Advances in the sociology of language. The Hague: Mouton, 1971.Google Scholar
  37. Labov, W. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  38. Labov, W. Lecture on sociolinguistics. American Sociological Association Convention, 1973.Google Scholar
  39. Lambert, W. A social psychology of bilingualism. Journal of Social Issues, 1967, 23, 91–109.Google Scholar
  40. Lambert, W., & Gardner, R. Motivational variables in second language learning. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1959, 13, 266–273.Google Scholar
  41. Lambert, W., Hodgson, R., Gardner, R., & Fillenbaum, S. Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1960, 60, 44–51.Google Scholar
  42. Leach, E. The political systems of highland Burma. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1954.Google Scholar
  43. Levine, L., & Crockett, H. Speech variation in a Piedmont community. In S. Lieberson (Ed.), Explorations in sociolinguistics. The Hague: Mouton, 1966.Google Scholar
  44. Lewis, G. Multilingualism in the Soviet Union. The Hague: Mouton, 1972.Google Scholar
  45. Lewis, O. A study of slum culture. New York: Random House, 1968.Google Scholar
  46. Lieberson, S. Language and ethnic relations in Canada. New York: Wiley, 1970.Google Scholar
  47. Macaulay, D. Social class and language in Glasgow. Language in Society, 1976, 5, 173–188.Google Scholar
  48. Maccoby, E., & Jacklin, C. The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  49. Quebec, Commission of Inquiry on the Position of the French language and on language rights in Quebec. Report. Book 1: The language of work. Quebec: Government of Quebec, 1972.Google Scholar
  50. Rona, J. P. The social and cultural status of Guarani in Paraguay. In W. Bright (Ed.), Sociolinguistics: Proceedings of the UCLA Sociolinguistics Conference, 1964. The Hague: Mouton, 1966.Google Scholar
  51. Rubin, J. National bilingualism in Paraguay. The Hague: Mouton, 1968.Google Scholar
  52. Sachs, J. Lieberman, P., & Erickson, D. Anatomical and cultural determinants of male and female speech. In R. Shuy and R. Fasold (Eds.), Language attitudes. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  53. Saint-Jacques, B. Sex, dependency, and language. La Linguistique, 1973, 9, 89–96.Google Scholar
  54. Schlieben-Lange, B. The language situation in Southern France. Linguistics, 1977, 191, 33–44.Google Scholar
  55. Schumann, J. Social distance as a factor in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 1976, 26, 135–143.Google Scholar
  56. Sexton, P. The feminized male. New York: Random House, 1969.Google Scholar
  57. Shuy, R. Sex as a factor in sociolinguistic research. Paper presented to the Anthropological Society, Washington, D.C., 1969.Google Scholar
  58. Spolsky, B. Attitudinal aspects of second language learning. Language Learning, 1969, 19, 271–286.Google Scholar
  59. Statistics Canada. 1971 Census of Canada. Ottawa: Author, 1975.Google Scholar
  60. Trudgill, P. Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society, 1972, 1, 179–195.Google Scholar
  61. Trudgill, P. Sociolinguistics: An introduction. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin, 1974.Google Scholar
  62. Tudor, J. The development of class awareness in children. Social Forces, 1971, 49, 470–476.Google Scholar
  63. U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1970 Puerto Rico public use samples: Description and technical documentation. Washington, D.C.: 1972. (Xerox of a typescript)Google Scholar
  64. Wagenheim, K. Puerto Rico: A profile. In F. Cordasco and E. Bucchioni (Eds.), The Puerto Rican experience: A sociological sourcebook. Totawa, N.J.: Praeger, 1973.Google Scholar
  65. Wolfram, W. A sociolinguistic description of Detroit Negro speech. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics, 1969.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Angle
    • 1
  • Sharlene Hesse-Biber
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Arizona and Socio-Data AnalysisUSA
  2. 2.Boston CollegeUSA

Personalised recommendations