Sex Roles

, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp 103–109 | Cite as

Baby X

The effect of gender labels on adult responses to infants
  • Carol A. Seavey
  • Phyllis A. Katz
  • Sue Rosenberg Zalk
Research Articles


The present study investigated adult behavior while interacting with a three-month-old infant under conditions in which the child was introduced as a boy, as a girl, or with no gender information given. Gender labels did not elicit simple effects, but rather interacted significantly with the sex of the subject on both toy usage and physical contact measures. There was a stronger tendency for both male and female adults to utilize sex-stereotyped toys when the child was introduced as a girl. Most of the findings, however, reflected a differential response of men and women to the absence of gender information. In this condition, male subjects employed a neutral toy most frequently and handled the child least; in contrast, females used more stereotyped toys and handled the child more. All subjects attempted to guess the gender of the child (with “boy” guesses more frequent, although the child was actually female) and all justified their guess on the basis of stereotyped behavioral or physical cues like strength or softness.


Social Psychology Male Subject Strong Tendency Differential Response Simple Effect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bandura, A. Social learning theory of identificatory processes. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1969.Google Scholar
  2. Baumel, M. H., & Lewis, M. Infants' attentional distribution across two modalities. Paper presented at the meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, New York City, April, 1971.Google Scholar
  3. Bell, R., & Darling, J. The prone head reaction in the human newborn: Relationship with sex and tactile activity. Child Development 1965, 36 943–949.Google Scholar
  4. Gould, L. X: A fabulous child's story. Ms. December 1972, pp. 74–76; 105–106.Google Scholar
  5. Lewis, M. Parents and children: Sex-role development. School Review 1972, 80 229–240.Google Scholar
  6. Mischel, W. Sex-typing and socialization. In P. Mussen (Ed.), Manual of child psychology (Vol. II). New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1970.Google Scholar
  7. Moss, H. A. Sex, age, and state as determinants of mother-infant interaction. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 1967, 13 19–35.Google Scholar
  8. Sears, R. R., Rau, L., & Alpert, R. Identification and child rearing. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
  9. Weller, G. M., & Bell, R. Q. Basal skin conductance and neonatal state. Child Development 1965, 36 647–657.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carol A. Seavey
    • 1
  • Phyllis A. Katz
    • 1
  • Sue Rosenberg Zalk
    • 2
  1. 1.Graduate CenterCity University of New YorkNew York
  2. 2.Hunter CollegeCity University of New YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations