Sex Roles

, Volume 15, Issue 7–8, pp 433–442

The frequency, sources, and correlates of sexual harassment among women in traditional male occupations

  • Edward Lafontaine
  • Leslie Tredeau
Article

Abstract

Sexual harassment has increasingly come to be recognized as a major problem confronting working women. Utilizing the results of a survey of women in traditional male occupations (N=160), this paper summarizes some new data on the amount, type, and sources of harassment experienced by this group. Interpreting these findings within the content of the larger theory of patriarchy, it also identifies and provides further clarification of some individual and organizational correlates of harassment. The data offer provisional support for recent theoretical claims that women in male-defined occupations occupy a particularly problematic position vis-`a-vis men. Over 75% of the respondents reported experiencing at least one form of harassment as compared to the 50% + generally cited for the population as a whole. Consistent with the general cultural patterns of sexual violation, incidence of harassment was found to be inversely related to the level of severity. Probably predicated at least partially on opportunity structure, peers were cited as the most frequent source of harassment, followed by supervisors, subordinates and clients. A number of individual correlates of harassment were also identified. As expected, married workers and older respondents reported lower levels of harassment. A curvilinear relationship was found to exist between length of employment and harassment. Finally, respondents who were employed as managers and engineers reported approximately equal levels of harassment, while those in the professions such as the sciences, computers, public administration, etc., reported significantly lower levels of harassment. Consistent with the thesis of organizational culpability in the prevalence and persistence of sexual harassment, individuals employed in firms perceived to have high equal employment opportunity for women reported significantly lower levels of harassment than those in firms with low opportunity.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Backhouse, C., & Cohen, L. Sexual harassment on the job: How to avoid the working women's nightmare. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1981.Google Scholar
  2. Benson, D., & Thomson, G. Sexual harassment on a university campus: The confluence of authority relations, sexual interest, and gender stratification. Social Problems, 1982, 29, 236–251.Google Scholar
  3. Brewer, M., & Berk, R. Beyond nine to five: Introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 1982, 38, 1–4.Google Scholar
  4. Crocker, P. An analysis of university definitions of sexual harassment. Signs, 1983, 8, 696–707.Google Scholar
  5. Gutek, B., & Morasch, B. Sex-ratios, sex-role spillover, and sexual harassment of women at work. Journal of Social Issues, 1982, 38, 55–75.Google Scholar
  6. Hughes, J., & May, L. Sexual harassment. Social Theory and Practice, 1980, 6, 249–280.Google Scholar
  7. Littler-Bishop, S., Seidler-Feller, D., & Opaluch, R. Sexual harassment in the workplace as a function of initiator's status: The case of airline personnel. Journal of Social Issues, 1982, 38, 137–148.Google Scholar
  8. Livingston, J. Responses to sexual harassment on the job: Legal, organizational, and individual actions. Journal of Social issues, 1982, 38, 5–22.Google Scholar
  9. Loy, P., Steward, L. The extent and effect of sexual harassment of working women. Sociological Focus, 1984, 17, 31–43.Google Scholar
  10. MacKinnon, C. Sexual harassment of working women. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  11. Martin, S. E. Sexual harassment: The link between stratification, sexuality, and women's economic status. In J. Freeman (Ed.), Women: A feminist perspective. Palo Alto, Calif.: Mayfield Publishing Company, 1984.Google Scholar
  12. Project on the Status of Women. Sexual harassment: A hidden issue. Washington, D.C.: Association of American College, 1978.Google Scholar
  13. Schneider, B. Consciousness about sexual harassment among heterosexual and lesbian women workers. Journal of Social Issues, 1982, 38, 75–99.Google Scholar
  14. Silverman, D. Sexual harassment: Working women's dilemma. Quest: A Feminist Quarterly, 1977, 3, 15–23.Google Scholar
  15. Tangri, S., Bart, M., & Johnson, L. Sexual harassment at work: Three explanatory models. Journal of Social Issues, 1982, 38, 33–55.Google Scholar
  16. Tong, R. Women, sex and the law. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Allanheld, 1984.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward Lafontaine
    • 1
  • Leslie Tredeau
    • 1
  1. 1.Keuka CollegeUSA

Personalised recommendations