The masculine role as a moderator of stress-distress relationships
- 56 Downloads
- 20 Citations
Abstract
Health psychologists often content that men are more vulnerable to the effects of stress than are women. One explanation of this male risk factor deals with the masculine role — the set of values, beliefs, and expectations traditionally associated with men's lives. The present study was conducted to determine whether the restrictive emotionality, success preoccupation, and inhibited affection aspects of the masculine role, measured by the Masculine Role Inventory [MRI; W. E. Snell, Jr., “The Masculine Role Inventory (MRI): Components and Correlates,” Rex Roles, 1986] increase not only men's but also women's vulnerability to the effects of stressful life experiences. The results indicated that among both men and women with a recent history of stressful experiences in their lives, the masculine role was associated with elevated distress.
Keywords
Social Psychology Health Psychologist Stressful Life Life Experience Recent HistoryPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Antill, J. K., & Cunningham, J. D. Self-esteem as a function of masculinity in both sexes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1979, 47, 783–785.Google Scholar
- Belk, S. S., & Snell, W. E., Jr. Stereotypic beliefs about women as moderators of stress-distress relationships. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwestern Psychological Association, Ft. Worth, Tex., April 1986.Google Scholar
- Belk, S. S., & Snell, W. E. Jr. Avoidance strategy use in intimate relationships. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, in press.Google Scholar
- Brannon, R. Our culture's blueprint of manhood and what it's done for us lately. In D. Davis & R. Brannon (Eds.), The forty-nine percent majority: The male sex role. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1976.Google Scholar
- Bugen, L. A., & Hawkins, R. C. The Coping Assessment Battery: Theoretical and empirical foundations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, Calif., August 1981.Google Scholar
- Finney, J. W., Mitchell, R. E., Cronkite, R. C., & Moos, R. H. Methodological issues in estimating main and interactive effects: Examples from coping/social support and stress field. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1984, 25, 85–98.Google Scholar
- Goldberg, H. The hazards of being male. New York: New American Library, 1977.Google Scholar
- Harrison, J. Male sex role and health. Journal of Social Issues, 1978, 34, 65–86.Google Scholar
- Jones, W. H., Chernovetz, M. E. O., & Hansson, R. O. The enigma of androgyny: Different implication for males and females? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1978, 46, 298–313.Google Scholar
- Jourard, S. M. The transparent self. New York: Van Nostrand, 1971.Google Scholar
- O'Neil, J. M. Male sex role conflicts, sexism, and masculinity: Psychological implications for men, and women, and the counseling psychologist. The Counseling Psychologist, 1981, 9, 61–80. (a)Google Scholar
- O'Neil, J. M. Patterns of gender-role conflict and strain: Sexism and fear of femininity in men's lives. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1981, 60, 203–210. (b)Google Scholar
- Sarason, I. G., Johnson, J. H., & Giegel, J. M. Assessing the impact of life change: Development of the Life Experiences Survey. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1978, 46, 932–946.Google Scholar
- Silvern, L. E., & Ryan, V. L. Self-related adjustment and sex-typing in the Bem Sex Role Inventory: Is masculinity the primary predictor of adjustment? Sex Roles, 1979, 5, 739–763.Google Scholar
- Snell, W. E., Jr. The Masculine Role Inventory (MRI): Components and correlates. Sex Roles, 1986, 15, 359–366.Google Scholar
- Snell, W. E., Jr., Belk, S. S., & Hawkins, R. C. II. Drug dependency in stressful times: The influence of the masculine role and sex-related personality attributes. Unpublished manuscript, the University of Texas at Austin, 1986.Google Scholar
- Spence, J. T. Masculinity, femininity, and gender-related traits: A conceptual analysis and critique of current research. In B. A. Maher (Ed.), Progress in experimental personality research (Volume XIII). New York: Academic Press, 1984.Google Scholar
- Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. Masculine instrumentality and feminine expressiveness: Their relationships with sex role attitudes and behaviors. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1980, 5, 147–163.Google Scholar
- Spence, J. T., & Sawin, L. L. Images of masculinity and femininity: A reconceptualization. In V. O'Leary, R. Unger, and B. Wallston (Eds.), Sex, gender and social psychology. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1984.Google Scholar
- Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Stapp, J. Ratings of self and peers on sex-role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 32, 29–39.Google Scholar
- Waldron, I. Why do women live longer than men? I. Journal of Human Stress, 1976, 2, 1–13.Google Scholar
- Waldron, I., & Johnson, S. Why do women live longer than men? II. Journal of Human Stress, 1976, 2, 19–29.Google Scholar
- Whitley, B. E., Jr. Sex-role orientation and self-esteem: A critical meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983, 44, 773–786.Google Scholar
- Whitley, B. E., Jr. Sex-role orientation and psychological well-being: Two meta-analyses. Sex Roles, 1985, 12, 207–225.Google Scholar