Sex Roles

, Volume 18, Issue 9–10, pp 611–622

Changes in sexist attitudes toward women during introductory women's and men's studies courses

  • Gerald P. Jones
  • Carol Nagy Jacklin

Abstract

Sexism toward women scores of university students at the beginning of an introductory women's and men's studies (gender studies) course were compared with sexism levels of the same students at the end of the course and with sexism levels of controls. Differences in sexism levels associated with Bem's sex role categories were investigated. Sexism levels among students in every category, except undifferentiated, were significantly lower at the end of the course, while controls showed no pre/post differences. As expected, males were higher than females both at pretest and at posttest, and sexism in both sex groups decreased significantly by equivalent amounts; but androgynous males in the introductory course were lower in sexism than sex-typed males and androgynous females were lower than sex-typed females. Undifferentiated subjects decreased in sexism least during the course, and cross-typed and androgynous males decreased most. The relationship of sexism to several additional variables not included in formal hypotheses also is discussed. These variables were age, religion, ethnicity, SES, and grade earned in the gender studies course.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bayer, A. E. Sexist students in American colleges: A descriptive note. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1975, 37, 391–397.Google Scholar
  2. Bem, S. L. The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1974, 42, 155–162.Google Scholar
  3. Bem, S. L. On the utility of alternative procedures of assessing psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1977, 45, 196–205.Google Scholar
  4. Bem, S. L. The Bem Sex-Role Inventory Professional Manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  5. Bem, S. L. Androgyny and gender schema theory: A conceptual and empirical integration. In T. B. Sondregger (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Psychology and Gender, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1984.Google Scholar
  6. Benson, P. L., & Vincent, S. Development and validation of the Sexist Attitudes Toward Women Scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1980, 5, 276–291.Google Scholar
  7. Brod, H. The new men's studies: From feminist theory to gender scholarship. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 1987, 2, 179–196.Google Scholar
  8. Deckard, B. S. The women's movement: Political, socioeconomic, and psychological issues. New York: Harper & Row, 1975.Google Scholar
  9. Etaugh, C. Biographical predictors of college students' attitudes toward women. Journal of College Student Personnel, 1975, 16(4), 273–276.Google Scholar
  10. Ferree, M. M., & Hess, B. B. Controversy and coalition: The new feminist movement. Boston: Twayne Publishers, 1985.Google Scholar
  11. Jaggar, A. M., & Struhl, P. R. Feminist frameworks: Alternative theoretical accounts of the relations between women and men. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.Google Scholar
  12. Tavris, C., & Wade, C. The longest war: Sex differences in perspective, 2nd ed. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1984.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerald P. Jones
    • 1
  • Carol Nagy Jacklin
    • 1
  1. 1.Program for the Study of Women and Men in SocietyUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos Angeles
  2. 2.Los Angeles

Personalised recommendations