Sex Roles

, Volume 11, Issue 9–10, pp 869–880 | Cite as

Situational moderators of gender differences in reward allocations

  • Brenda Major
  • Jeffrey B. Adams
Article

Abstract

This experiment investigated the impact of four variables, hypothesized to convey cues as to sex-role appropriate behavior, on gender differences in reward allocations between self and a co-worker. These variables were: expectations for future interactions with the co-worker, sex of co-worker, type of reward, and type of allocation decision. Males and females were asked to indicate how they would allocate money or course points between themselves and a same or opposite sex co-worker with inferior performance. Females allocated either type of reward more equitably than males when making independent allocations. When making joint (zero-sum) allocations, however, both sexes allocated rewards more equitably with a same-sex co-worker than with an opposite-sex co-worker when future interaction with the co-worker was expected. Grades were seen as more important than money by both sexes, and both men and women allocated course points more equitably than money. Type of reward did not, however, differentially affect men's and women's allocation patterns. Overall, independent allocations were more equitable than joint allocations. Results are discussed as suggesting that gender differences in reward allocations are not a result of inherent personality differences between the sexes but rather reflect the influence of situational factors that can arouse sex-role specific self-presentational concerns.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Austin, W., & McGinn, N. C. Sex differences in choice of distribution rules. Journal of Personality, 1977, 45, 379–394.Google Scholar
  2. Callahan-Levy, C. M., & Messe, L. A. Sex differences in the allocation of pay. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37, 433–446.Google Scholar
  3. Darley, M., & Fazio, R. H. Expectancy confirmation processes arising in the social interaction sequence. American Psychologist, 1980, 35, 867–881.Google Scholar
  4. Deaux, K. The behavior of women and men. Monterey, Calif.: Brooks/Cole, 1976.Google Scholar
  5. Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Fishbaugh, L. Sex differences in conformity: Surveillance by the group as a determinant of male nonconformity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1981, 40, 384–394.Google Scholar
  6. Kahn, A., Lamm, H., & Nelson, R. E. Preferences for an equal or equitable allocator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977, 35, 837–844.Google Scholar
  7. Kahn, A., Nelson, R. E., & Gaeddert, W. P. Sex of subject and sex composition of the group as determinants of reward allocations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 38, 737–750.Google Scholar
  8. Kahn, A., Lamm, H., Krulewitz, J. E., & O'Leary, V. E. Equity and equality: Male and female means to a just end. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1980, 1, 173–197.Google Scholar
  9. Kidder, L. H., Bellettine, G., & Cohn, E. S. Secret ambitions and public performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1977, 13, 70–80.Google Scholar
  10. Major, B., & Adams, J. The role of gender, interpersonal orientation and self-presentation in distributive justice behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983, 45, 598–608.Google Scholar
  11. Major, B., & Deaux, K. Individual differences in justice behavior. In J. Greenberg & R. Cohen (Eds.), Equity and justice in social behavior. New York: Academic Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  12. Mednick, M., & Tangri, S. S. New social psychological perspectives on women. Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 28, 1–16.Google Scholar
  13. Reis, H. T. Self presentation and distributive justice. In J. T. Tedeschi (Ed.), Impression management theory and social psychological research, New York: Academic Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  14. Reis, H. T., & Gruzen, J. On mediating equity, equality, and self-interest: The role of self presentation in social exchange. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1976, 12, 487–503.Google Scholar
  15. Reis, H. T., & Jackson, L. Sex differences in reward allocation: Subjects, partners, and tasks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1981, 40, 465–478.Google Scholar
  16. Shapiro, E. G. Effect of expectations of future interaction on reward allocation in dyads: Equity or equality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 31, 873–880.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brenda Major
    • 1
  • Jeffrey B. Adams
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyState University of New York at BuffaloBuffalo

Personalised recommendations