Sex Roles

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 183–188 | Cite as

Feminists and traditionalists: An attitudinal comparison

  • M. Dwayne Smith
  • George D. Self
Article

Abstract

Comparisons are made between self-identified feminists and traditionalists on an attitudinal inventory scale. Feminists are found to display a more consistent sex-role ideology as measured by inter-item consistency. Traditionalists believe in labor and political equality, but differ from feminists in regard to relations with men and notions of domestic roles. The findings suggest that a more consistent sex-role ideology among women should occur with increased feminist identification. However, stereotypes and misunderstandings concerning feminism may prevent this development among many women.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cherniss, C. Personality and ideology: A personological study of women's liberation. Psychiatry, 1972, 35, 109–125.Google Scholar
  2. Cohen, A. R. Attitude change and social influence. New York: Basic Books, 1964.Google Scholar
  3. Decter, M. The new chastity and other arguments against women's liberation. New York: Capricorn, 1974.Google Scholar
  4. Dempewolff, J. A. Some correlates of feminism. Psychological Reports, 1974, 34, 671–676.Google Scholar
  5. Goldberg, P. A., Gottesdiener, M., & Abramson, P. R. Another put-down of women?: Perceived attractiveness as a function of support for the feminist movement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 32, 113–115.Google Scholar
  6. Gump, J. P. Comparative analysis of black women's and white women's sex-role attitudes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1975, 43, 858–863.Google Scholar
  7. Hesselbart, S. A comparison of attitudes toward women and attitudes toward Blacks in a Southern city. Sociological Symposium, 1976, (17), 45–68.Google Scholar
  8. Jacobson, M. B., & Koch, W. Attributed reasons for support of the feminist movement as a function of attractiveness. Sex Roles, 1978, 4, 169–174.Google Scholar
  9. Mason, K. O., & Bumpass, L. L. U.S. women's sex-role ideology, 1970. American Journal of Sociology, 1975, 80, 1212–1219.Google Scholar
  10. Mason, K. O., Czajka, J. L., & Arber, S. Change in U. S. women's sex-role attitudes, 1964–1974. American Sociological Review, 1976, 41, 573–596.Google Scholar
  11. Morgan, C. S. Support for the goals of the women's rights movement among Oklahoma college students. Paper presented at the meeting of the Southwestern Sociological Association, Dallas, April 1976.Google Scholar
  12. Osmond, M. W., & Martin, P. M. Sex and sexism: A comparison of male and female sex-role attitudes. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1973, 37, 744–758.Google Scholar
  13. Parelius, A. P. Emerging sex-role attitudes, expectations, and strains among college women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1975, 37, 146–153.Google Scholar
  14. Rose, C. Women's sex-role attitudes: A historical perspective. New Directions for Higher Education, 1975, 11, 1–31.Google Scholar
  15. Ruble, D. N., Croke, J. A., Frieze, I., & Parsons, J. E. A field study of sex-role attitude change in college women. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1975, 5, 110–117.Google Scholar
  16. Smith, E. R., Ferree, M. M., & Miller, F. D. A short scale of attitudes toward feminism. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 1975, 6, 51–56.Google Scholar
  17. Tavris, C. Who likes women's liberation—and why: The case of the unliberated liberals. Journal of Social Issues, 1973, 29, 175–198.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Dwayne Smith
    • 1
  • George D. Self
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SociologyTulane UniversityNew Orleans
  2. 2.Near East Bureau, Agency for International DevelopmentUSA

Personalised recommendations