Sex-role research has been hampered by a lack of valid and reliable research tools to measure the construct being studied. This article describes the development of a research scale (ISRO) to measure women's sex-role orientation. This 16-item questionnaire has been shown to be internally consistent and to have fairly high temporal stability over 30 days. The high sensitivity (96.2%) and specificity (95.5%) suggest that it differentiates feminist from traditional women. Three factors assess attitudinal domains of conflict between family responsibilities and having a career; male/female division of household responsibilities; and women's work roles outside the home. Education appears to be the strongest predictor of ISRO scores.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Dixon, R. B. Women's rights and fertility. Reports on Population/Family Planning, 1975, 17 (January).Google Scholar
- Dreyer-Arkin, N. Delaying behavior in seeking diagnosis for suspected cervical cancer, Unpublished master's thesis, Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, School of Public Health, 1976.Google Scholar
- Gump, J. P. Sex role attitudes and psychological well-being. Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 28, 29–37.Google Scholar
- Likert, R. The method of constructing an attitude scale. In R. Fishbein (Ed.), Readings in attitude theory and measurement. New York: Wiley, 1976.Google Scholar
- Mason, K. O., & Bumpass, L. L. Women's sex-role ideology, 1970. American Journal of Sociology, 1975, 80(5), 1212–1219.Google Scholar
- Patterson, R. M., & Craig, J. B. Misconceptions concerning the psychological effects of hysterectomy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1963, 55, 104–111.Google Scholar
- Renneker, R., & Cutler, M. Psychological problems of adjustment to cancer of the breast. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1952, 148, 833–838.Google Scholar
- Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. The Attitudes Toward Women Scale: An objective instrument to measure attitudes toward the rights and roles of women in contemporary society. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 1972, 2, 66.Google Scholar
- Wolman, B. B. (Ed.). Dictionary of behavioral sciences. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1973.Google Scholar