Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 18, Issue 3–4, pp 159–168 | Cite as

Sex bias in visual images evoked by generics: A new zealand study

  • Elizabeth Wilson
  • Sik Hung Ng
Article

Abstract

Male biases are known to exist in the usage, evaluation, and interpretation of masculine generics. This study explored, by means of a tachistoscope, sex-specific biases in visual images evoked by masculine (“All men are created equal,” “At university a student can study whatever he wants”) and feminine (“The feminists protested outside the town hall,” “At university a student can study whatever she wants”) generics. Photographs of male and female faces were presented in a deliberately ambiguous (subthreshold) viewing field while maintaining the masculine or feminine generic sentence on constant view. It was predicted and found in a sample of 48 university students that if generics invoked sex-specific images, the images would affect the direction in which the viewer would resolve the ambiguous faces, resulting in more reported male faces in the masculine than in the feminine generic condition.

Keywords

Social Psychology Generic Condition Visual Image Town Hall Generic Sentence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bodine, A. Androcentrism in the perspective grammar: Singular “they”, sex-indefinite “he”, and “he or she”. Language in Society, 1975, 4, 129–146.Google Scholar
  2. Briere, J., & Lanktreen, C. Sex-role related effects of the sex bias in language. Sex Roles, 1983, 9, 625–633.Google Scholar
  3. Cole, C. M., Hill, F. A., & Dayley, L. J. Do masculine pronouns used generically lead to thoughts of men? Sex Roles, 1983, 9, 737–749.Google Scholar
  4. Cooper, R. L. The avoidance of androcentric generics. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 1984, 50, 5–20.Google Scholar
  5. Harrison, L. Cro-magnon woman—in eclipse. The Science Teacher, 1975, 42, 8–11.Google Scholar
  6. MacKay, D. G. Language, thought and social attitudes. In H. Giles, P. Robinson & P. M. Smith (eds.), Language: Social psychological perspectives. Oxford: Pergamon, 1980.Google Scholar
  7. MacKay, D. G., & Fulkerson, D. C. On the comprehension and production of pronouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 1979, 18, 661–673.Google Scholar
  8. Martyna, W. What does he mean? Use of the generic masculine. Journal of Communication, 1978, 28, 131–138.Google Scholar
  9. Martyna, W. The psychology of the generic masculine. In S. McConnell-Ginet, R. Borker, & N. Fulman (eds.), Women and language in literature and society. New York: Praeger, 1980.Google Scholar
  10. Morgan, E. The ascent of women. London: Corgi, 1972.Google Scholar
  11. Moulton, J., Robinson, G. M., & Elias, C. Sex bias in language use: Neutral pronouns that aren't. American Psychologist, 1978, 33, 1032–1036.Google Scholar
  12. Murdock, N. L., & Forsyth, D. R. Is gender-biased language sexist? A perceptual approach. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1985, 9, 39–49.Google Scholar
  13. Nilsen, A. P. Sexism in children's books and elementary teaching materials. In A. P. Nilsen, H. Bosmajian, H. L. Gershung, & J. P. Stanley (eds.), Sexism and language. Urbana, Ill: National Council of Teachers of English, 1977.Google Scholar
  14. Pittigrew, T. R., Allport, G. W., & Barnett, E. C. Binocular rivalry and perception of race in South Africa. British Journal of Psychology, 1958, 49, 265–278.Google Scholar
  15. Schneider, J. W., & Hacker, S. L. Sex role imagery and use of the generic “man” in introductory texts: A case in the sociology of sociology. American Sociologist, 1973, 8, 12–18.Google Scholar
  16. Wise, E., & Rafferty, J. Sex bias and language. Sex Roles, 1982, 8, 1189–1196.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth Wilson
    • 1
  • Sik Hung Ng
    • 1
  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations