Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 20, Issue 5–6, pp 327–344 | Cite as

The role of experience in spatial test performance: A meta-analysis

  • Maryann Baenninger
  • Nora Newcombe
Article

Abstract

The hypothesis that spatial ability is, in part, experientially determined, and that sex differences in spatial ability can be explained by sex differences in spatial experience, can be studied in a correlational manner by examining the relationship between spatial activity participation and spatial ability test performance for males and females. Alternatively, an experimental training situation, comparing male and female susceptibility to training, has been proposed to test the hypothesis that environment has an impact on spatial skills and sex differences in ability. Both lines of research are reviewed here, through the use of meta-analytic techniques. The first meta-analysis reveals a weak but reliable relationship between spatial activity participation and spatial ability. This relationship appears similar for males and females. The second meta-analysis reveals that spatial ability test performance can be improved by training for both sexes. This improvement does not appear different for males and females, however, contrary to a predominant hypothesis in the literature. Training to asymptote may be a better test of the relevance of differential experience to sex differences. Content and duration of training are also discussed as important factors in the effectiveness of training.

Keywords

Social Psychology Test Performance Activity Participation Good Test Spatial Ability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bergan, A., McManis, D. L., & Melchert, P. A. Effects of social and token reinforcement of WISC Block Design performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1971, 32, 871–880.Google Scholar
  2. Blade, M. F., & Watson, W. S. Increase in spatial visualization test scores during engineering study. Psychological Monographs, 1955, 69 (Whole No. 397).Google Scholar
  3. Blatter, P. Training in spatial ability: A test of Sherman's hypothesis. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1983, 57(3), 987–992.Google Scholar
  4. Block, J. H. Another look at sex differentiation in the socialization behaviors of mothers and fathers. In J. Sherman & F. L. Denmark (Eds.), The psychology of women: Future directions in research. New York: Psychological Dimensions, 1978.Google Scholar
  5. Brinkmann, E. H. Programmed instruction as a technique for improving spatial visualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1966, 50, 179–184.Google Scholar
  6. Caplan, P. J., MacPherson, G. M., & Tobin, P. Do sex-related differences in spatial abilities exist? American Psychologist, 1985, 40, 786–799.Google Scholar
  7. Chance, J. E., & Goldstein, A. G. Internal-external control of reinforcement and embedded figures performance. Perception and Psychophysics, 1971, 9, 33–34.Google Scholar
  8. Churchill, R. D., Curtis, J. M., Coombs, C. H., & Harrell, T. W. Effect of engineer school training on the Surface Development Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1942, 2, 279–280.Google Scholar
  9. Ciganko, R. A. The effect of spatial information training and drawing practice upon spatial visualization ability and representational drawings of ninth grade students. Unpublished doctoral dissertion, Illinois State University, 1973.Google Scholar
  10. Connor, J. M., & Serbin, L. A. Behaviorally based masculine and feminine activity preference scales for preschoolers: Correlates with other classroom behaviors and cognitive tests. Child Development, 1977, 48, 1411–1416.Google Scholar
  11. Connor, J. M. Schackman, M., & Serbin, L. A. Sex related differences in response to practice on a visual spatial test and generalization to a related test. Child Development, 1978, 49, 24–29.Google Scholar
  12. Eliot, J. Dataspace: A computer search service for spatial ability literature, University of Maryland, College Park, 1985.Google Scholar
  13. Etaugh, C. Introduction: The influence of environmental factors on sex differences in children's play. In M. B. Liss (Ed.), Social and cognitive skills: Sex roles and children's play. New York: Academic Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  14. Fraser, M. E. Early Life Experiences Questionnaire: A test of its validity in measuring differential antecedents of specific mental abilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 1982.Google Scholar
  15. Fraser, M. E., Bouchard, T. J., & Keyes, M. A. The Early Life Experiences Questionnaire. Unpublished materials, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 1979.Google Scholar
  16. Goldstein, A. G., & Chance, J. E. Effects of practice on sex-related differences in performance on embedded figures. Psychonomic Science, 1965, 3, 361–362.Google Scholar
  17. Graham, M. F., & Birns, B. Where are the women geniuses? Up the down escalator. In C. B. Kopp & M. Kirkpatrick (Eds.), Becoming female: Perspectives on development. New York: Plenum Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  18. Halpern, D. Sex differences in cognitive abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates, 1986.Google Scholar
  19. Hansen, M. J., Jamison, W., & Signorella, M. L. Spatial performance, activity participation, and masculinity-femininity. Paper presented at the meetings of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, August 1982.Google Scholar
  20. Hilton, T. L. National changes in spatial-visual ability from 1960–1980. Research report, Educational Testing Services, Princeton, NJ, 1985.Google Scholar
  21. Hilton, T. L., & Berglund, G. W. Sex differences in mathematics achievement — A longitudinal study. The Journal of Educational Research, 1974, 67, 231–237.Google Scholar
  22. Kyllonen, P. C., Lohman, D. F., & Snow, R. E. Effects of aptitudes, strategy training, and task facets on spatial test performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1984, 76, 130–145.Google Scholar
  23. Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 1985, 56, 1479–1498.Google Scholar
  24. Lohman, D. F. The effect of speed-accuracy tradeoff on sex differences in mental rotation. Perception and Psychophysics, 1986, 39, 427–436.Google Scholar
  25. Lohman, D. F. Spatial abilities as traits, processes, and knowledge. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence, Vol. 4. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1988.Google Scholar
  26. Lolla, R. S. The effect of selected instruction in tactual-visual perception on ninth grade male and female's visual imagery, mechanical reasoning and spatial relations abilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, 1973.Google Scholar
  27. Lunneborg, C. E., & Lunneborg, P. W. Contribution of sex-differentiated experiences to spatial and mechanical reasoning abilities. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1984, 59, 107–113.Google Scholar
  28. Lusk, E. J., & Wright, H. Differences in sex and curricula on learning the group embedded figures tests. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1981, 53, 8–10.Google Scholar
  29. Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  30. McDaniel, E. D., Guay, R. B., Ball, L., & Kollof, M. A spatial experience questionnaire and some preliminary findings. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, 1978.Google Scholar
  31. McGee, M. G. Effects of training and practice on sex differences in mental rotation test score. Journal of Psychology, 1978, 100, 87–90.Google Scholar
  32. Mullen, B., & Rosenthal, R. BASIC meta-analysis: Procedures and programs. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates, 1985.Google Scholar
  33. Nash, S. C. The relationship among sex-role stereotyping, sex-role preferences, and the sex differences in spatial visualization. Sex Roles, 1975, 1, 15–32.Google Scholar
  34. Newcombe, N. A longitudinal study of predictors of spatial ability in adolescent females. Paper presented at the meetings of the Society for Research in Child Development, Baltimore, MD, April, 1987.Google Scholar
  35. Newcombe, N. Sex-related differences in spatial ability: Problems and gaps in current approaches. In M. Potegal (Ed.), Spatial abilities: Development and physiological foundations. New York: Academic Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  36. Newcombe, N., & Bandura, M. Effect of age at puberty on spatial ability in girls: A question of mechanism. Developmental Psychology, 1982, 19(2), 215–224.Google Scholar
  37. Newcombe, N., & Dubas, J. S. Individual differences in cognitive ability: Are they related to timing of puberty? In R. M. Lerner & T. T. Foch (Eds.), Biological-psychosocial interactions in early adolescence. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  38. Newcombe, N., Bandura, M., & Taylor, D. Sex differences in spatial ability and spatial activities. Sex Roles, 1983, 9, 377–386.Google Scholar
  39. Newcombe, N., Dubas, J. S., & Baenninger, M. Associations of timing of puberty with spatial ability: Do they persist into adulthood? Child Development, 1989, 60, 245–246.Google Scholar
  40. Petersen, A. C. Physical androgyny and cognitive functioning in adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 1976, 12, 533–542.Google Scholar
  41. Resnick, S. M., Berenbaum, S. A., Gottesman, I. I., Bouchard, T. J. Early hormonal influences on cognitive functioning in congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Developmental Psychology, 1986, 22, 191–198.Google Scholar
  42. Rosenthal, R. Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1984.Google Scholar
  43. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. The essentials of behavioral research. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1984.Google Scholar
  44. Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. Further meta-analytic procedures for assessing cognitive gender differences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1982, 74, 708–712.Google Scholar
  45. Sevy, B. A. Sex-related differences in spatial ability: The differences in spatial ability: The effects of practice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1983.Google Scholar
  46. Sherman, J. A. Problem of sex differences in space perception and aspects of intellectual functioning. Psychological Review, 1967, 74, 290–299.Google Scholar
  47. Sherman, J. A. Field articulation, sex, spatial visualization, dependence, practice, laterality of the brain and birth order. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1974, 38, 1223–1235.Google Scholar
  48. Sherman, J. A. Continuing in mathematics: A longitudinal study of the attitudes of high school girls. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1982, 72, 132–140.Google Scholar
  49. Signorella, M. L., Krupa, M. H., Jamison, W., & Lyons, N. A short version of a spatial activities questionnaire. Sex Roles, 1986, 14, 475–479.Google Scholar
  50. Signorella, M. L., & Jamison, W. Masculinity, femininity, androgyny, and cognitive performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 1986, 100, 207–229.Google Scholar
  51. Signorella, M. L., Jamison, W., & Krupa, M. H. Predicting spatial performance from activity preferences and masculinity, femininity, and androgyny in self-concept. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Baltimore, MD, April 1987.Google Scholar
  52. Stericker, A., & LeVesconte, S. Effect of brief training on sex-related differences in visual-spatial skill. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982, 43(5), 1018–1029.Google Scholar
  53. Taylor, D. G. Sex-related differences in spatial skills and hemispheric lateralization: The effects of training. Unpublished master's thesis, Pennsylvania State University, 1982.Google Scholar
  54. Vandenberg, S. G. Sources of variance in performance of spatial tests. In J. Eliot & N. J. Salkind (Eds.), Children's spatial development. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, 1975.Google Scholar
  55. Waber, D. P. Sex differences in mental abilities, hemispheric lateralization, and rate of physical growth at adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 1977, 13, 29–38.Google Scholar
  56. Wolfe, L. R. The effects of space visualization training on spatial ability and arithmetic achievement of junior highschool students. Unpublished dissertation, State University of New York, 1970.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maryann Baenninger
    • 1
  • Nora Newcombe
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyTemple UniversityPhiladelphia

Personalised recommendations