Sex Roles

, Volume 17, Issue 3–4, pp 179–186

A content analysis of sexual themes in Playboy cartoons

  • Mala L. Matacin
  • Jerry M. Burger
Article

Abstract

Critics of pornography have argued that the way men and women are portrayed in these media create images that can result in harmful gender socialization. The cartoons from all 1985 issues of Playboy were coded for the presence or absence of four themes that have been identified by these critics. It was found that, when these themes appeared, women were more often the victim of sexual coercion, were more often depicted as sexually naive and childlike, and were more often shown with a more attractive body than were the men in the cartoons.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbey, A. Sex differences in attributions for friendly behavior: Do males misperceive females' friendliness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982, 42, 830–838.Google Scholar
  2. Brownmiller, S. Against our will: Men, women, and rape. New York: Bantam, 1975.Google Scholar
  3. Chapman, A. J., & Gadfield, N.J. Is sexual humor sexist? Journal of Communication, 1976, 26, 141–153.Google Scholar
  4. Chavez, D. Perpetuation of gender inequality: A content analysis of comic strips. Sex Roles, 1985, 13, 93–102.Google Scholar
  5. Donnerstein, E. Erotica and human aggression. In R. Green & E. Donnerstein (Eds.), Aggression: Theoretical and empirical reviews, Vol. 2, New York: Academic Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  6. Kanin, E. J. Date rape: Unofficial criminals and victims. Victimology, 1984, 9, 95–108.Google Scholar
  7. Kanin, E. J. Date rapists: Differential sexual socialization and relative deprivation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 1985, 14, 219–231.Google Scholar
  8. Killoran, M. M. Sticks and stones can break my bones and images can hurt me: Feminists and the pornography debate. International Journal of Women's Studies, 1983, 6, 443–456.Google Scholar
  9. Lederer, L. Take back the night: Women on pornography. New York: Morrow, 1980. (a)Google Scholar
  10. Lederer, L. “Playboy isn't playing” An interview with Judith Bat-Aba. In L. Lederer (Ed.), Take back the night: Women on pornography. New York: Morrow, 1980. (b)Google Scholar
  11. Malamuth, N. M., & Spinner, B. A longitudinal content analysis of sexual violence in the best-selling erotic magazines. Journal of Sex Research. 1980, 16, 226–237.Google Scholar
  12. O'Donnell, W. J., & O'Donnell, K. J. Update: Sex role messages in TV commercials. Journal of Communication, 1978, 28, 156–158.Google Scholar
  13. Palmer, C. E. Pornographic comics: A content analysis. Journal of Sex Research, 1979, 15, 285–298.Google Scholar
  14. Ross, L., Anderson, D. R., & Wisocki, P. A. Television viewing and adult sex-role attitudes. Sex Roles, 1982, 8, 589–592.Google Scholar
  15. Schwartz, L. A., & Markham, W. T. Sex stereotyping in children's toy advertisements. Sex Roles, 1985, 12, 157–170.Google Scholar
  16. Smith, D. C. The social content of pornography. Journal of Communication, 1976, 26, 16–24.Google Scholar
  17. Tieger, T. Self-rated likelihood of raping and the social perception of rape. Journal of Research in Personality, 1981, 15, 147–158.Google Scholar
  18. Venkatesan, M., & Losco, J. Women in magazine ads: 1959–1971. Journal of Advertising Research. 1975, 15, 49–54.Google Scholar
  19. Winick, C. A Content analysis of sexually explicit magazines sold in an adult bookstore. Journal of Sex Research, 1985, 21, 206–210.Google Scholar
  20. Zimbardo, P. G., & Meadow, W. Sexism springs eternal... in the Reader's Digest. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Psychological Association, San Francisco, 1974.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mala L. Matacin
    • 1
  • Jerry M. Burger
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologySanta Clara UniversitySanta Clara

Personalised recommendations