Abstract
This methodological investigation of sex stereotypes employed three different instruments to collect sex stereotypes from 264 undergraduate students. The Adjective Check List and the Stereotype Questionnaire elicited different stereotypes, while an open-ended form elicited no stereotypic items. It was found that Ss reported visual imagery of specific persons while responding. In a second phase of the research, the stereotypic items obtained in the collection phase were marked on the appropriate instrument form for a male and female description. These forms with a set of multiple choice questions concerning such things as sex of the description, desirability, adjustment, and of the S's experience of visual imagery were given to 180 different Ss. The stereotypic items were found to convey reliable information as to judgment of the sex of the stimulus stereotypic items, however, the different instruments conveyed differential information as to sex of stimulus items, desirability, and adjustment of the instrument description. Visual imagery of Ss was found to be significantly related to correct judgment of sex of stimulus items and to high confidence in that judgment.
Keywords
Undergraduate Student High Confidence Reliable Information Multiple Choice Methodological StudyPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- American Psychological Association. Ethical standards of psychologists. Washington, D.C.: Author, 1963.Google Scholar
- Brigham, J. C. Ethnic stereotypes. Psychological Bulletin, 1971, 76, 15–38.Google Scholar
- Broverman, I. K., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., Rosenkrantz, P. S., & Vogel, S. R. Sex-role stereotypes and clinical judgments of mental health. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1970, 34, 1–7.Google Scholar
- Campbell, D. Stereotypes and perception of group differences. American Psychologist, 1967, 22, 817–829.Google Scholar
- Clarkson, E. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, I. K., Broverman, D. M., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. Family size and sex role stereotypes. Science, 1971, 167, 390–392.Google Scholar
- Diamond, S. Sex stereotypes and acceptance of sex role. Journal of Psychology, 1955, 39, 385–388.Google Scholar
- Downie, N., & Heath, R. Basic statistical methods. New York: Harper and Row, 1965.Google Scholar
- Ehrlich, H. J., & Rinehart, J. W. A brief report on the methodology of stereotyping research. Social Forces, 1965, 43, 564–575.Google Scholar
- Fernberger, S. W. Persistence of stereotypes concerning sex differences. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1948, 43, 97–101.Google Scholar
- Gough, H. G., & Heilbrun, A. B., Jr. Adjective check list manual. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1965.Google Scholar
- Lunneborg, P. Stereotypic aspect in masculinity—femininity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1970, 34, 113–118.Google Scholar
- Neisser, U. Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts, 1967.Google Scholar
- Orne, M. On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York, 1961.Google Scholar
- Rosenkrantz, P. S., Vogel, S., Bee, H., Broverman, I. K., & Broverman, D. M. Sex-role stereotypes and self concepts in college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1968, 32, 287–295.Google Scholar
- Sherif, M., & Sherif, C. Social psychology. New York: Harper and Row, 1969.Google Scholar
- Sherriff, A. C., & McKee, J. D. Qualitative aspects of beliefs about men and women. Journal of Personality, 1957, 25, 451–464.Google Scholar