Sex Roles

, Volume 12, Issue 3–4, pp 353–361

What's in an author's name? Differential evaluations of performance as a function of author's name

  • Michele A. Paludi
  • Lisa A. Strayer


Three hundred college students (150 female, 150 male) were asked to evaluate an academic article in the field of politics, psychology of women, or education (judged masculine, feminine, and neutral, respectively) that was written by either a male, a female, or an author with a sexually ambiguous name. The results indicated that ratings of the articles were differentially perceived and evaluated according to the name of the author. An article written by a male was valued more positively than if the author was not male. Furthermore, subjects' bias against women was stronger when they believed that sexually neutral authors were female.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allport, G. W. The nature of prejudice. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor, 1954.Google Scholar
  2. Baumrind, D. From each according to her ability. School Review, 1972, 80, 1961–1990.Google Scholar
  3. Deaux, K., & Taynor, J. Evaluation of male and female ability: Bias works two ways. Psychological Reports, 1973, 32, 261–262.Google Scholar
  4. Feather, N. T., & Simon, J. G. Reactions to male and female success and failure in sex-linked occupations: Impressions of personality, causal attributions, and perceived likelihood of different consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 1, 20–31.Google Scholar
  5. Feldman-Summers, S. A., & Kiesler, S. B. Those who are number two try harder: The effect of sex on attributions of causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974, 30, 846–855.Google Scholar
  6. Goldberg, P. A. Are women prejudiced against women? Transaction, 1968, 5, 28–30.Google Scholar
  7. Issacs, M. B. Sex-role stereotyping and the evaluation of the performance of women: Changing trends. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1981, 6, 187–195.Google Scholar
  8. Jacobson, M. B., & Effertz, J. Sex roles and leadership. Perception of the leaders and the led. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1974, 12, 383–396.Google Scholar
  9. Lockheed, M. E., & Hall, K. P. Conceptualizing sex as a status characteristic: Applications to leadership training strategies. The Journal of Social Issues, 1976, 32, 111–124.Google Scholar
  10. Meyer, J., & Sobieszek, B. Effect of a child's sex on adult interpretation of its behavior. Developmental Psychology, 1972, 6, 42–48.Google Scholar
  11. Paludi, M. A., & Bauer, W. D. Goldberg revisited: What's in an author's name? Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 1983, 3, 387–390.Google Scholar
  12. Panek, P. E., Rush, M. C., & Greenawalt, J. P. Current sex stereotypes of 25 occupations. Psychological Reports, 1977, 40, 212–214.Google Scholar
  13. Pheterson, G. I. Female prejudice against men, Unpublished manuscript, New London: Connecticut College, 1969.Google Scholar
  14. Pheterson, G. I., Kiesler, S. B., & Goldberg, P. A. Evaluation of the performance of women as a function of their sex, achievement, and personal history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971, 19, 114–118.Google Scholar
  15. Rosenkrantz, P., Vogel, S., Bee, H., Broverman, I., & Broverman, D. M. Sex-role stereotypes and self-concepts in college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1968, 32, 287–295.Google Scholar
  16. Ross, R. T. Optimum orders for the presentation of pairs in the method of paired comparisons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1934, 25, 375–382.Google Scholar
  17. Taynor, J., & Deaux, K. When women are more deserving than men: Equity, attribution, and perceived sex differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 3, 360–367.Google Scholar
  18. Taynor, J., & Deaux, K. Equity and perceived sex differences: Role behavior as defined by the task, the mode, and the actor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1975, 3, 381–390.Google Scholar
  19. Thurstone, L. L. A law of comparative judgement. Psychological Review, 1927, 34, 273–286.Google Scholar
  20. Ward, C. Prejudice against women: Who, when, and why? Sex Roles, 1981, 7, 163–171.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michele A. Paludi
    • 1
  • Lisa A. Strayer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyKent State UniversityKent

Personalised recommendations