Sex Roles

, Volume 10, Issue 5–6, pp 435–443 | Cite as

When to speak like a lady

  • Susan Kemper


The existence of sexually biased stereotypes about the polite speech of men and women was documented in a series of three studies. In Study I, masculine, feminine, and neutral activities were identified. In Study II, the perceived politeness of five different forms of requests was determined. In the final study, men and women were asked to judge the appropriateness of requests by men and women speakers to addressees of either sex. The requests differed in politeness, and requested either masculine, feminine, or neutral actions. These ratings revealed that women are expected to speak more politely than men, regardless of the sex of the addressee or the nature of the requested action. However, men are expected to use different forms for requests for masculine, feminine, and neutral actions and to use different forms of requests for men and women addressees.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Edelsky, C. Acquisition of an aspect of communicative competence: Learning what it means to talk like a lady. In S. Ervin-Tripp & C. Mitchell-Kernan (Eds.), Child discourse. New York: Academic Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  2. Ervin-Tripp, S. Is Sybil there? The structure of some American English directives. Language in Society, 1976, 5, 25–66. (a)Google Scholar
  3. Ervin-Tripp, S. Speech acts and social learning. In K. Basso & H. Selby (Eds.) Meaning in anthropology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1976. (b)Google Scholar
  4. Jespersen, O. Language: Its nature, development, and origin. London: Allen and Unwin, 1922.Google Scholar
  5. Kemper, S., & Thissen, D. Memory for the dimensions of requests. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1981, 20, 552–563.Google Scholar
  6. Kramer, C. Women's speech: Separate but unequal? Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1974, 60, 14–24. (a)Google Scholar
  7. Kramer, C. Folklinguistics. Psychology Today, June 1974, 8, 82–85. (b)Google Scholar
  8. Kruskal, J. B., Young, F. W., & Seery, J. B. How to use KYST, a very flexible program to do multidimensional scaling and unfolding. Unpublished report, Bell Laboratories, 1973.Google Scholar
  9. Labov, W. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  10. Lakoff, R. Language and woman's place. Language in Society. 1973, 2, 45–79.Google Scholar
  11. Lakoff, R. Language and woman's place. New York: Harper & Row, 1975.Google Scholar
  12. Lakoff, R. What you can do with words: Politeness, pragmatics, and performatives. In A. Rogers, B. Wall, & J. P. Murphy (Eds.), Proceedings of the Texas Conference on Performatives, Presuppositions, and Implications. Arlington, Va.: Center for Applied Linguistics, 1977.Google Scholar
  13. Lakoff, R. Stylistic strategies within a grammer of style. In J. Orasanu, M. K. Slater, & L. L. Adler (Eds.), Language, sex, and gender: Does “la difference” make a difference? New York: New York Academy of Sciences, 1979.Google Scholar
  14. Levine, L., & Crockett, H. J., Jr. Speech variation in a Piedmont community: Postvocalic r. In S. Lieberson (Ed.), Explorations in sociolinguistics. The Hague: Mouton, 1966.Google Scholar
  15. Pruzansky, S. SINDSCAL: A computer program for individual differences in multidimensional scaling. Unpublished report, Bell Laboratories, 1975.Google Scholar
  16. Shepard, R. N. Multidimensional scaling, tree-fitting, and clustering. Science, 1980, 210(24), 390–397.Google Scholar
  17. Thorne, B., & Henley, N. Difference and dominance: An overview of language, gender, and society. In B. Throne & N. Henley (Eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury, 1975.Google Scholar
  18. Trudgill, P. Sex, covert prestige, and linguistic change in the urban Britain English of Norwich. Language in Society, 1972, 1, 179–195.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan Kemper
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of KansasLawrence

Personalised recommendations